Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Stout Beer Batch Fermentation Using Free and Microencapsulated Yeasts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food and Bioprocess Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because many questions arise regarding the use of immobilization technology to consistently produce a high quality beer, this work focuses on the effects of using an immobilization matrix in the fermentation process. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and potential uses of immobilization on sensorial characteristics such as color, flavor, and headspace compounds of stout beer, when using batch fermentation. Batch production of beer was conducted as a standard ale process for stout beer production. For the immobilized yeasts fermentation, cells were microencapsulated in alginate, by using the Thiele modulus procedure for microcapsule design. Glucose concentration, cell multiplication, cell viability, specific gravity, pH, Brix, and ethanol were monitored throughout the fermentation process. Both, sensorial analysis (statistic triangle tests) and instrumental methods (gas chromatography to measure headspace compounds and visible spectrophotometer to quantify the color) were used to evaluate characteristics of the beer that was produced from immobilized and free yeast fermentations. Free and immobilized yeasts fermentation showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) for all variables of interest. The profile of headspace compounds was different, perhaps because of changes in yeast’s behavior and the presence of secondary metabolites. However, immobilization did not have a significant impact on the beer flavor, as detected by the sensorial triangle test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, C., Sánchez, E., Young, M., & Simpson, R. (2003). Prediction correlation of vapor pressure for methyl jasmonate. Journal of Food Engineering, 59(4), 431–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, C., Sánchez, E., Reyes, J., & Young, M. (2007). Volatile organic compounds produced by human skin cells. Biological Research, 40(3), 347–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, C., Skurtys, O., Young, M., Enrione, J., Pedreschi, F., & Osorio, F. (2009). A non-destructive digital imaging method to predict immobilized yeast-biomass. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 42(8), 1444–1449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., & Ollis, D. (1986). Biochemical engineering fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S., & Panigrahi, S. (2010). Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) techniques for quality characterization of food products: A review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0299-3, in press.

  • Bamforth, C. (2004). Beer health and nutrition. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brányik, T., Vicente, A., Dostalek, P., & Teixeira, J. (2005). Continuous beer fermentation using immobilized yeast cell bioreactor systems. Biotechnology Progress, 21(3), 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, R. (2003). Chemometrics: Data analysis for the laboratory and chemical plant. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, M. (1996). Comparative studies of five supports for yeast immobilisation by adsorption/attachment. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 102(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa, K., Yamada, T., Mizoguchi, H., & Hara, S. (2003). Increased ethyl caproate production by inositol limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengeneering, 95(5), 448–454.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannoum, B., & Stephanopoulos, G. (1986). Diffusion coefficients of glucose and ethanol in cell-free and cell-occupied calcium alginate membranes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 28(6), 829–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, W. (1995). The properties of beer. In W. Hardwick (Ed.), Handbook of brewing (pp. 551–585). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karel, S., Libicki, S., & Robertson, C. (1985). The immobilization of whole cells: Engineering principles. Chemical Engineering Science, 40(8), 1321–1354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kierstan, M., & Bucke, C. (1977). The immobilization of microbial cells, subcellualar organelles, and enzymes in calcium alginate gels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 19(3), 387–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Yu, S., Son, J., Hübner, H., & Buchholz, R. (1998). Calculations on O2 transfer in capsules with animal cell for the determination of maximum capsule size without O2 limitation. Biotechnology Letters, 20(6), 549–552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, M., Lambrechts, M., & Pretorius, I. (2000). Effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltransferase activity on flavor profiles of wine and distillates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(2), 744–753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nedovic, V., & Willaert, R. (2004). Fundamentals of cell immobilisation biotechnology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedovic, V., Obradovic, B., Leskosek-Cukalovic, I., Trifunovic, O., Pesic, R., & Bugarski, B. (2001). Electrostatic generation of alginate microbeads loaded with brewing yeast. Process Biochemistry, 37(1), 17–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oerther, S., Le Gall, H., Payan, E., Lapicque, F., Presle, N., Hubert, P., et al. (1999). Hyaluronate-alginate gel as a novel biomaterial: Mechanical properties and formation mechanism. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 63(2), 206–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orive, G., Hernández, R., Gascón, A., Igarta, M., & Pedraz, J. (2002). Encapsulated cell technology: From research to market. Trends in Biotechnology, 20(9), 382–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, H., Maragaritis, A., Mensour, N., & Russell, I. (1998). Fundamentals of immobilised yeast cell for continuous beer fermentation: A review. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 104(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, L., Reddy, L., Wee, Y., & Reddy, O. (2010). Production and characterization of wine with sugarcane piece immobilized yeast biocatalyst. Food and Bioprocess Technology, doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0321-9, in press.

  • Saeed, A., Sharov, V., White, J., Li, J., Liang, W., Bhagabati, N., et al. (2003). TM4: A free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques, 34(2), 374–378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smogrovicova, D., Domeny, Z., Germeiner, P., Malovikova, A., & Sturdik, E. (1997). Reactors for continuous primary beer fermentation using immobilised yeast. Biotechnology Techniques, 11(4), 261–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smogrovicova, D., Domeney, Z., & Svitel, J. (2001). Modeling of saccharide utilization in primary beer fermentation with yeasts immobilized in calcium alginate. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 94(2), 147–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., Matsumura, M., & Veliky, I. (1984). Diffusion characteristic of substrates in Ca-alginate gel beads. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 26(1), 53–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vairo, M. (1961). Methylene blue solutions for staining dead yeast cells. Stain Technology, 36, 329–330.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Iersel, M., Meersman, E., Arntz, M., Ronbouts, F., & Abee, T. (1998). Effect of environmental conditions on flocculation and immobilization of brewer’s yeast during production of alcohol-free beer. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 104(3), 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iersel, M., Brouwer-Post, E., Ronbouts, F., & Abee, T. (2000). Influence of yeast immobilization on fermentation and aldehyde reduction during the production of alcohol-free. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 26(8), 602–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaert, R., & Nedovic, V. (2006). Primary beer fermentation by immobilised yeast: A review on flavour formation and control strategies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81(8), 1353–1367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sergio F. Almonacid or Cristian A. Acevedo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almonacid, S.F., Nájera, A.L., Young, M.E. et al. A Comparative Study of Stout Beer Batch Fermentation Using Free and Microencapsulated Yeasts. Food Bioprocess Technol 5, 750–758 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0379-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0379-4

Keywords

Navigation