Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Posterior urethral valves: Pre- and postnatal management

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Posterior urethral valves are a common problem encountered by pediatric urologists. The diagnosis is most frequently suggested by antenatal screening ultra-sound. A variety of pre- and postnatal parameters have been identified to aid in predicting ultimate renal outcome. These prognostic tools are invaluable to the clinician for counseling parents and for choosing appropriate manage-ment. Several approaches to the treatment of patients with posterior urethral valves exist, and the ideal strategy is debatable. As technology evolves, more options for early intervention become available. Whether early detection and antenatal intervention improve patient outcome remains to be proven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Gonzales ET: Posterior urethral valves and other urethral anomalies. In Campbell’s Urology, edn 7. Edited by Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:2069–2091.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith GH, Duckett JW: Urethral lesions in infants and children. In Adult and Pediatric Urology, edn 3. Edited by Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW. St. Louis: Mosby Year-Book; 1996:2411–2443.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott JF, Levine D, Wapner R: Posterior urethral valves: inaccuracy of prenatal diagnosis. Fetal Diagn Ther 1998, 13:179–183. This is a sobering review of the antenatal diagnosis for posterior urethral valves, accurate in less than 50% of cases examined.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sholder AJ, Maizels M, Depp R, et al.: Caution in antenatal intervention. J Urol 1988, 139:1026.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaefer M, Peters CA, Retik AB, et al.: Increased renal echo-genicity: a sonographic sign for differentiating between obstructive and nonobstructive etiologies of in utero bladder distention. J Urol 1997, 158:1026–1029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hutton KAR, Thonas DFM, Arthur RJ, et al.: Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: is gestational age at detection a predictor of outcome? J Urol 1994, 152:698–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutton KA, Thomas DF, Davies BW: Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: qualitative assessment of second trimester scans and prediction of outcome. J Urol 1997, 158:1022–1025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jee LD, Rickwood MK, Turnock RR: Posterior urethral valves. Does prenatal diagnosis influence prognosis. Br J Urol 1993, 72:830–833.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duel BP, Mogbo K, Barthold JS, et al.: Prognostic value of initial renal ultrasound in patients with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1998, 160:1198–1200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reingberg Y, De Castano I, Gonzales R: Prognosis for patients with prenatally diagnosed posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1992, 148:125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. El-Ghoneimi A, Desgrippes A, Luton D, et al.: Outcome of posterior urethral valves: to what extent is it improved by prenatal diagnosis? J Urol 1999, 162:849–853. This paper critically examines the value of prenatal diagnosis, failing to find a significant difference in outcome when comparing pre- and postnatally diagnosed posterior urethral valves all managed postnatally.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rittenberg MH, Hulbert WC, Snyder HM, et al.: Protective factors in posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1988, 140:993–996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crombleholme TM, Harrison MR, Golbus MS, et al.: Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162:1239–1244.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandelbrot L, Dumez Y, Muller F, et al.: Prenatal prediction of renal function in fetal obstructive uropathies. J Perinat Med 1991, 19:283–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elder JS, O’Grady JP, Ashmead G, et al.: Evaluation of fetal renal function: unreliability of fetal urinary electrolytes. J Urol 1990, 144:574–578.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson MP, Bukowski TP, Reitleman C, et al.: In utero surgical treatment of fetal obstructive uropathy: a new comprehen-sive approach to identify appropriate candidates for vesicoamniotic shunt therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994, 170:1770–1779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Herndon A, McKenna PH, Freedman AL, et al.: Consensus on the approach to antenatally detected urologic abnormalities. Pediatrics 1999, 104:860.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mandell J, Peters CA, Estroff JA, et al.: Late onset severe oligohydramnios associated with genitourinary abnormali-ties. J Urol 1992, 148:515–518.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chevalier RL: Developmental renal physiology of the low birth weight pre-term newborn. J Urol 1996, 156:714–719. This paper is a comprehensive review of renal physiology in the premature neonate.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakayama DK, Harrison MR, de Lorimier AA: Prognosis of posterior urethral valves presenting at birth. J Pediatr Surg 1986, 21:43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tietjen DN, Gloor JM, Husmann DA: Proximal urinary diversion in the management of posterior urethral valves: is it necessary? J Urol 1997, 158:1008–1010. This paper directly addresses the concept of supravesical diversion, finding it warranted in few circumstances.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrison MR, Ross NA, Noall R, et al.: Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero I. The model: fetal urethral obstruc-tion produces hydronephrosis and pulmonary hypoplasia in fetal lambs. J Pediatr Surg 1883, 18:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feldman B, Hassan S, Kramer RL, et al.: Amnioinfusion in the evaluation of fetal obstructive uropathy: the effect of anti-biotic prophylaxis on complication rates. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999, 14:172–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Killpatrick SJ: Therapeutic intervention for oligohydramnios: amnioinfusion and maternal hydration. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997, 40:328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison MR, Filly RA: The fetus with obstructive uropathy: pathophysiology, natural history, selection and treatment. In The Unborn Patient, edn 2. Edited by Harrison MR, Golbus MS, Filly RA. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990:29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Freedman AL, Evans MI, Johnson MP: Complications of vesicoamniotic shunt placement for antenatal obstructive uropathy. J Urol 1997, 157:10A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elder JS, Duckett JW, Snyder HM: Intervention for fetal obstructive uropathy: has it been effective? Lancet 1987, 2:1007–1010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Freedman AL, Budowski TP, Smith CA, et al.: Fetal therapy for obstructive uropathy: specific outcomes diagnosis. J Urol 1996, 156:720–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shimada K, Hosokawa S, Tohda A, et al.: Follow-up of children after fetal treatment for obstructive uropathy. Int J Urol 1998, 5:312–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quintero RA, Hume R, Smith C, et al.: Percutaneous fetal cystoscopy and endoscopic fulguration of posterior urethral valves. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995, 172:206–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Quintero RA, Johnson MP, Romero R, et al.: In-utero percu-taneous cystoscopy in the management of fetal lower obstructive uropathies. Lancet 1995, 346:537–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Longaker MT, Golbus MS, Filly RA, et al.: Maternal outcome after open fetal surgery. JAMA 1991, 265:737–741.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Agarwal S: Urethral valves. Br J Urol 1999, 84:570–578.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenfeld B, Greenfield SP, Springate JE, et al.: Type III posterior urethral valves: presentation and management. J Pediatr Surg 1994, 29:81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dewan PA, Zappala SM, Ransley PG, et al.: Endoscopic reappraisal of the morphology of congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. Br J Urol 1992, 70:439–444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Merguerian PA, McLorie GA, Churchill BM, et al.: Radiographic and serologic correlates of azotemia in patients with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1992, 148:1499–1503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Warshaw BL, Hymes LC, Trulock TS, et al.: Prognostic features in infants with obstructive uropathy due to posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1985, 133:240–243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Parkhouse HF, Barratt TM, Dillon MJ, et al.: Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1988, 62:59–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Drozd D, Drozd M, Gretz N, et al.: Progression to end-stage renal disease in children with posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Nephrol 1998, 12:630–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bomalaski MD, Anema JG, Coplen DE, et al.: Delayed presen-tation of posterior urethral valves: a not so benign condition. J Urol 1999, 162:2130–2132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lal R, Bhatnagar V, Mitra DK: Long-term prognosis of renal function in boys treated for posterior urethral valves. Eur J Ped Surg 1999, 9:307–311.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoover DL, Duckett JW: Posterior urethral valves, unilateral reflux, and renal dysplasia: a syndrome. J Urol 1982, 128:994–997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Greenfield SP, Hensle TW, Berdon WE, et al.: Unilateral vesicoureteral reflux and unilateral non-functioning kidney associated with posterior urethral valves—a syndrome? J Urol 1983, 130:733.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cuckow PM, Dineen MD, Risdon, et al.: Long-term renal function in the posterior urethral valves, unilateral reflux and renal dysplasia syndrome. J Urol 1997, 158:1004–1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cendron M, Elder JS, Duckett JW: Perinatal urology. In Adult and Pediatric Urology, edn 3. Edited by Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1996:2075–2170.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Blocksom Jr BH: Bladder pouch for prolonged tubular cystostomy. J Urol 1957, 78:398.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith GH, Canning DA, Schulman SL, et al.: The long-term outcome of posterior urethral valves treated with primary valve ablation and observation. J Urol 1996, 155:1730–1734. This is a valuable long-term assessment of renal function in patients with posterior urethral valves, highlighting renal failure rates approaching 50% with extended follow-up.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reinberg Y, De Castano I, Gonzalez R: Influence of initial therapy on progression of renal failure and body growth in children wit posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1992, 148:532–533.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim YH, Horowitz M, Combs AJ, et al.: The management of unilateral poorly functioning kidneys in patients with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1997, 158:1001–1003. This study challenges the doctrine that VURD kidneys should be excised secondary to a high potential for morbidity, with more than 75% of patients retaining the poorly functioning moiety without adverse sequella.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Churchill BM, Aliabadi H, Landau EH, et al.: Ureteral bladder augmentation. J Urol 1993, 150:716–720.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Peters CA, Bauer SB: Evaluation and management of urinary incontinence after surgery for posterior urethral valves. Urol Clin North Am 1990, 17:379–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Greenfield SP: Editorial: posterior urethral valves—new concepts. J Urol 1997, 157:996–997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lal R, Bhatnagar V, Agarwala S, et al.: Urodynamic evaluation in boys treated for posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Surg Int 1999, 15:358–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Holmdahl G, Sillen U, Bachelard M, et al.: The changing urodynamic pattern in valve bladders during infancy. J Urol 1995, 153:463–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. DeGennaro M, Capitanucci ML, Capozza M, et al.: Detrusor hypocontractility in children with posterior urethral valves arises before puberty. Br J Urol 1998, 81: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nguyen HT, Peters CA: The long-term complications of posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1999, 83:23–38. This is an excellent review of long-term considerations in patients with posterior urethral valves.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Krueger RP, Hardy BE, Churchill BM: Cryptorchidism in boys with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1980, 124:101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Woodhouse CR, Reilly JM, Bahadur G: Sexual function and fertility in patients treated for posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1989, 142:586–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology, University of Kansas School of Medicine and Children’s Mercy Hospital, 5520 College Boulevard, Suite 425, 66211, Overland Park, KS, USA

    John M. Gatti MD & Andrew J. Kirsch MD

Authors
  1. John M. Gatti MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew J. Kirsch MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gatti, J.M., Kirsch, A.J. Posterior urethral valves: Pre- and postnatal management. Curr Urol Rep 2, 138–145 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-001-0011-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-001-0011-2

Keywords