Skip to main content
Log in

Deep brain stimulation in neuropsychiatric disorders

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and internal globus pallidus has been put forth as an alternative to surgical ablation for the treatment of movement disorders. In this paper, the authors discuss the history and putative physiologic mechanisms underlying DBS of these target regions. The authors then review empirical findings pertaining to the effects of DBS on neurological symptoms, cognitive functioning, and psychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor, the disorders for which the procedure has been most extensively applied. Finally, emerging and potential novel areas of application of DBS for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Horsley V: The Linacre lecture: the function of the so-called motor area of the brain. Br Med J 1909, 2:125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myers R: Surgical interruption of the pallidofugal fibers: its effect on the syndrome paralysis agitans and technical considerations in its application. NY State J Med 1942, 42:317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Szekely EG, et al.: Campotomy in various extrapyramidal disorders. J Neurosurg 1963, 20:871–884.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laitinen LV, Bergenheim AT, Hariz MI: Leskell’s posteroventral pallidotomy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg 1992, 76:53–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Svennilson E, Torvik A, Lowe R, Leskell L: Treatment of parkinsonism by sterotactic thermolesions in the pallidal region: a clinical evaluation of 81 cases. Acta Psychgiatr Neurol Scand 1960, 35:358–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassler R, Riechert T: Indikationen und lokalisationsmethod der gezielten hirnoperationen. Nervenarzt 1954, 25:441–447.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriel EM, Nashold BS Jr.: Evolution of neuroablative surgery for involuntary movement disorders: an historical review. Neurosurgery 1998, 42:575–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gildenberg PL: Management of movement disorders: an overview. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995, 6:43–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goetz CG, Diederich NJ: There is a renaissance of interest in pallidotomy for Parkinson’s disease. Nat Med 1996, 2:510–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Obeso JA, Guridi J, DeLong MR: Surgery for Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997, 62:2–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burchiel KJ: Thalamotomy for movement disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995, 6:55–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson SB, Troster AI: Surgical interventions in neurodegenerative disease: Impact on memory and cognition. In Memory in Neurodegenerative Disease. Biological, Cognitive, and Clinical Perspectives. Edited by Troster AI. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press: 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. York MK, Levin HS, Grossman RG, Hamilton WJ: Neuropsychological outcome following unilateral pallidotomy. Brain 1999, 122:2209–2220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zirh A, Reich SG, Dougherty PM, Lenz FA: Stereotactic thalamotomy in the treatment of essential tremor of the upper extremity: Reassessment including a blinded measure of outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 66:772–775.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Benabid AL, Koudsié A, Benazzouz A, et al.: Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Arch Med Res 2000, 31:282–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fields JA, Troster AI: Cognitive outcomes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a review of initial studies and recommendations for future research. Brain Cogn 2000, 42:268–293. An excellent review of the neuropsychologic studies of DBS of the Vim thalamus, STN, and GPi.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallett M, Litvan I: Evaluation of surgery for Parkinson’s disease: a report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1999, 53:1910–1921. Succinct review of the neurologic outcome and clinical potential of DBS by a committee of experts in the field.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haberler C, Alesch F, Mazal PR, et al.: No tissue damage by chronic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 2000, 48:372–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar R, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Lozano AM, et al.: Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidud pars interna in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2000, 55:S34-S39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lozano AM: Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 2001, 7:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL: Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 1986, 9:357–381.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parent A, Lévesque M, Parent M: A re-evaluation of the current model of the basal ganglia. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 2001, 7:193–198. This paper challenges the currently predominant model of basal ganglia circuitry.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jahanshahi M, Jenkins IH, Brown RG, et al.: Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements: an investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson’s disease subjects. Brain 1995, 118:913–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Colebatch JG, Findley LJ, Frackowiak RS, et al.: Preliminary report: activation of the cerebellum in essential tremor. Lancet 1990, 336:1028–1030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Houk JC, Wise SP: Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action. Cereb Cortex 1995, 2:95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parent A, Hazrati L: Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia: the place of subthalamic nucleus and external pallidum in basal ganglia circuitry. Brain Res Rev 1995, 20:128–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yokoyama T, Sugiyama K, Nishizawa S, et al.: Neural activity of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998, 140:287–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dubois B, Pillon B: Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 1997, 244:2–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bondi MW, Troster AI: Parkinson’s disease: neurobehavioral consequences of basal ganglia dysfunction. In Handbook of Neuropsychology. Edited by Nussbaum PD. New York: Plenum Press; 1997:216–245.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Delis DC, Massman PJ: The effects of dopamine fluctuation on cognition and affect. In Parkinson’s Disease: Neurobehavioral Aspects. Edited by Cummings JL. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992:288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lucas JA, Rippeth JD, Uitti RJ, et al.: Neuropsychological functioning in a patient with essential tremor with and without bilateral VIM stimulation. Brain Cogn 2000, 42:253–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tröster AI, Fields JA, Pahwa R, et al.: Neuropsychological and quality of life outcome after thalamic stimulation for essential tremor. Neurology 1999, 53:1774–1780.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Litvan I, Paulsen JS, Mega MS, Cummings JL: Neuropsychiatric assessment of patients with hyperkinetic and hypokinetic movement disorders. Arch Neurol 1998, 55:1313–1319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Marsh L: Neuropsychiatric aspects of Parkinson’s disease. Psychosomatics 2000, 41:15–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenblatt A, Leroi I: Neuropsychiatry of Huntington’s disease and other basal ganglia disorders. Psychosomatics 2000, 41:24–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hubble JP, Busenbark KL, Wilkinson S, et al.: Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Neurology 1996, 46:1150–1153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koller WC, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, et al.: Efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the Vim nucleus of the thalamus for essential head tremor. Mov Disord 1999, 14:847–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pollak P, Benabid AL, Limousin P, Benazzouz A: Chronic intracerebral stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 1997, 74:213–220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shuurman PR, Bosch A, Bossuyt PMN, et al.: A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:461 468.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Caparros-Lefebvre D, Blond S, Pecheux N, et al.: Neuropsychological evaluation before and after thalamic stimulation in 9 patients with Parkinson disease. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1992, 148:117–122.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ondo W, Jankovic J, Schwartz K, et al.: Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease tremor. Neurology 1998, 51:1063–1069.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tröster AI, Fields JA, Wilkinson SB, et al.: Neuropsychological functioning before and afterunilateral thalamic stimulating electrode implantation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosurg Focus 1997, 2:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tröster AI, Wilkinson SB, Fields JA, et al.: Chronic electrical stimulation of the left ventrointermediate (Vim) thalamic nucleus for the treatment of pharmacotherapy-resistant Parkinson’s disease: a differential impact on access to semantic and episodic memory? Brain Cogn 1998, 38:125–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Houeto JL, Damier P, Bejjani PB, et al.: Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a multidisciplinary approach. Arch Neurol 2000, 57:461–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar R, Lozano AM, Sime E, et al.: Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Neurology 1999, 53:561–566.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P, et al.: Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1105–1111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ceballos-Baumann AO, Boecker H, Bartenstein P, et al.: A positron emission tomographic study of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease: enhanced movement-related activity of motor-association cortex and decreased motor cortex resting activity. Arch Neurol 1999, 56:997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Limousin P, Greene J, Pollak P, et al.: Changes in cerebral activity pattern due to subthlamic nucleus or internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1997, 42:283–291. This study is important for having shown increased movementrelated regional cerebral blood flow with STN stimulation in PD patients, further supporting a role for this structure in PD.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Favre J, et al.: Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s disease: results of a randomized, blinded pilot study. Neurosurgery 1999, 45:1375–1384. This is the first prospective, randomized study on the efficacy and safety of GPi and STN stimulation for PD.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jahanshahi M, Ardoin CM, Brown RG, et al.: The impact of deep brain stimulation on executive function in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2000, 123:1142–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ardouin C, Pillon B, Peiffer E, et al.: Bilateral subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease affects neither memory nor executive functions: a consecutive series of 62 patients. Ann Neurol 1999, 46:217–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Trépanier LL, Kumar R, Lozano AM, et al.: Neuropsychological outcome of GPi pallidotomy and GPi or STN deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Cogn 2000, 42:324–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar R, Lozano AM, Kim YJ, et al.: Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1998, 51:850–855.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bejjani BP, Damier P, Arnulf I, et al.: Transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:1476–1480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar R, Krack P, Pollak P: Transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation. N Engl J Med 1999, 341:1003–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Diederich NJ, Alesch F, Goetz CG: Visual hallucinations induced by deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000, 23:287–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ghika J, Villemure J-G, Fankhauser H, et al.: Efficiency and safety of bilateral contemporaneous pallidal stimulation (deep brain stimulation) in levodopa-response patients with Parkinson’s disease with severe motor fluctuations: a 2-year follow-up review. J Neurosurg 1998, 89:713–718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Fields JA, Troster AI, Wilkinson SB, et al.: Cognitive outcome following staged bilateral pallidal stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1999, 101:182–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Tronnier VM, Fogel W, Kronenbuerger M, Steinvorth S: Pallidal stimulation: an alternative to pallidotomy? J Neurosurg 1997, 87:700–705.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Vingerhoets G, van der Linden C, Lannoo E, et al.: Cognitive outcome after unilateral pallidal stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 66:297–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Tröster AI, Fields JA, Wilkinson SB, et al.: Unilateral pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: neurobehavioral functioning before and 3 months after electrode implantation. Neurology 1997, 49:1078–1083.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dujardin K, Krystkowiak P, Defebvre L, Blond S: A case of severe dysexecutive syndrome consecutive to chronic bilateral pallidal stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1305–1315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Volkmann J, Sturm V, Weiss P, et al.: Bilateral high-frequency stimulation of the internal globus pallidus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1998, 44:953–961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Miyawaki E, Perlmutter JS, Troster AI, et al.: The behavioral consequences of pallidal stimulation: a case report. Brain Cogn 2000, 42:417–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rezai AR, Lozano AM, Crawley AP, et al.: Thalamic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: localization of cortical and subcortical activation with implanted electrodes: technical note. J Neurosurg 1999, 90:583–590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wichmann T, DeLong MR: Models of basal ganglia function and pathophysiology of movement disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1998, 9:223–236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Schmahmann JD: From movement to thought: anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognitive processing. Human Brain Mapping 1996; 4:174–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Thompson TP, Kondziolka D, Albright AL: Thalamic stimulation for choreiform movement disorders in children: report of two cases. J Neurosurg 2000, 92:718–721.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Whittle IR, Hooper J, Pentland B: Thalamic deep-brain stimulation for movement disorders due to multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998, 351:109–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Davis KD, Taub E, Duffner F, et al.: Activation of the anterior cingulate cortex by thalamic stimulation in patients with chronic pain: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosurg 2000, 92:64–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sellal F, Hirsch E, Barth P, et al.: A case of symptomatic hemidystonia improved by ventroposterolateral thalamic electrostimulation. Mov Disord 1993, 8:515–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Krauss JK, Pohle T, Weber S, et al.: Bilateral stimulation of globus pallidus internus for treatment of cervical dystonia. Lancet 1999, 354:837–838.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kumar R, Dagher A, Hutchinson WD, et al.: Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for generalized dystonia: clinical and PET investigation. Neurology 1999, 53:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Fogel W, Tronnier V, Krause M, et al.: Bilateral pallidal stimulation in a case of idiopathic torsion dystonia: a new treatment option? Mov Disord 1998, 13:199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Loher TJ, Hasdemir MG, Burgunder J-M, Krauss JK: Long-term follow-up study of chronic globus pallidus internus stimulation for posttraumatic hemidystonia: case report. J Neurosurg 2000, 92:457–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, R.M., Flashman, L.A., Saykin, A.J. et al. Deep brain stimulation in neuropsychiatric disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 3, 366–372 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-996-0028-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-996-0028-9

Keywords

Navigation