Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electronic Health Record Recording of Patient Pain: Challenges and Discrepancies

  • Regenerative Pain Medicine/Interventional Pain Medicine (E Cornett Bradley, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In the present review, various categories of pain, clinician-observed pain scales, and patient-reported pain scales are evaluated to better understand factors that impact patient pain perceptions. Additionally, the expansion of areas that require further research to determine the optimal way to evaluate pain scale data for treatment and management are discussed.

Recent Findings

Electronic health record (EHR) data provides a starting point for evaluating whether patient predictors influence postoperative pain. There are several ways to assess pain and choosing the most effective form of pain treatment. Identifying individuals at high risk for severe postoperative pain enables more effective pain treatment. However, there are discrepancies in patient pain reporting dependent on instruments used to measure pain and their storage in the EHR. Additionally, whether administered by a physician or another healthcare practitioner, differences in patient pain perception occur. While each scale has distinct advantages and limitations, pain scale data is a valuable therapeutic tool for assisting clinicians in providing patients with optimal pain control. Accurate assessment of patient pain perceptions by data extraction from electronic health records provides a potential for pain alleviation improvement.

Summary

Predicting high-risk postoperative pain syndromes is a difficult clinical challenge. Numerous studies have been conducted on factors that impact pain prediction. Postoperative pain is significantly predicted by the kind of operation, the existence of prior discomfort, patient anxiety, and age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. • Horn R, Kramer J. Postoperative pain control. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 9]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544298/. This article provides a general introduction to current postoperative pain control assessment and treatment options.

  3. Baratta JL, Schwenk ES, Viscusi ER. Clinical consequences of inadequate pain relief: barriers to optimal pain management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4 Suppl 2):15S-21S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):S17-24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garra G, Singer AJ, Domingo A, Thode HC. The Wong-Baker pain FACES scale measures pain, not fear. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):17–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morasco B, Lovejoy T, Hyde S, Shull S, Dobscha S. Limitations of pain numeric rating scale scores collected during usual care: need for enhanced assessment. J Pain. 2018;19(3):S57–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ngamkham S, Vincent C, Finnegan L, Holden JE, Wang ZJ, Wilkie DJ. The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in people with cancer: an integrative review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13(1):27–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cushman D, McCormick Z, Casey E, Plastaras CT. Discrepancies in describing pain: is there agreement between numeric rating scale scores and pain reduction percentage reported by patients with musculoskeletal pain after corticosteroid injection? Pain Med. 2015;16(5):870–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.iasp-pain.org/

  10. Hasenbring M, Hallner D, Klasen B. Psychologische Mechanismen im Prozess der Schmerzchronifizierung. Schmerz. 2001;15(6):442–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swieboda P, Filip R, Prystupa A, Drozd M. Assessment of pain: types, mechanism and treatment. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;Spec no. 1:2–7.

  12. Grichnik KP, Ferrante FM. The difference between acute and chronic pain. Mt Sinai J Med. 1991;58(3):217–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell JN, Meyer RA. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006;52(1):77–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Auvenshine RC. Acute vs. chronic pain. Tex Dent J. 2000;117(7):14–20.

  15. Fillingim RB, Loeser JD, Baron R, Edwards RR. Assessment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanisms. J Pain. 2016;17(9 Suppl):T10-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. St. John Smith E. Advances in understanding nociception and neuropathic pain. J Neurol. 2018;265(2):231–8.

  17. Woolf CJ, Mannion RJ. Neuropathic pain: aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet. 1999;353(9168):1959–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, Baron R, Dickenson AH, Yarnitsky D, et al. Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anand KJS, Aranda JV, Berde CB, Buckman S. Summary proceedings from the neonatal pain-control group. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):S9-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. • Schwerin D, Mohney S. EMS pain assessment and management. StatsPearls Publishing [Internet]. 2021 May; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554543/#article-89519.s3%20(EMS%20Pain%20Assessment%20And%20Management-%202021This article provides a comprehensive picture of various pain assessment tools and pain management options.

  21. Voepel-Lewis T, Zanotti J, Dammeyer JA, Merkel S. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(1):55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maaskant J, Raymakers-Janssen P, Veldhoen E, Ista E, Lucas C, Vermeulen H. The clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(10):1587–611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Dijk M, Peters JWB, van Deventer P, Tibboel D. The COMFORT Behavior Scale. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(1):33–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wibbenmeyer L, Sevier A, Liao J, Williams I, Barbara Latenser. Evaluation of the usefulness of two established pain assessment tools in a burn population. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(1):52–60.

  25. Marmo L, Fowler S. Pain assessment tool in the critically ill post–open heart surgery patient population. Pain Manag Nurs. 2010;11(3):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Odhner M, Wegman D, Freeland N, Steinmetz A. Assessing pain control in nonverbal critically ill adults. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2003;22(6):260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kabes AM, Graves JK, Norris J. Further validation of the nonverbal pain scale in intensive care patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2009;29(1):59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGuire D, Kaiser K, Haisfield-Wolfe M, Iyamu F. Pain assessment in non-communicative adult palliative care patients. Nurs Clin North Am. 2016;51(3):397–431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Le May S, Ballard A, Khadra C, Gouin S, Plint AC, Villeneuve E, et al. Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale. Pain. 2018;159(8):1508–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, Jones JB, Jones JH, Brizendine EJ. The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(3):165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanabe P, Buschmann M. A prospective study of ED pain management practices and the patient’s perspective. J Emerg Nurs. 1999;25(3):171–7.

  32. Motov SM, Khan AN. Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: are we ever going to get better? J Pain Res. 2008;9(2):5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rupp T, Delaney KA. Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43(4):494–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson JE, Pendleton JM. Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1989;7(6):620–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis LM, Lasater LC, Brooks CB. Are emergency physicians too stingy with analgesics? South Med J. 1994;87(1):7–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rawlins JM, Khan AA, Shenton AF, Sharpe DT. Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 208 children with burns attending an emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23(5):289–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Todd KH, Ducharme J, Choiniere M, Crandall CS, Fosnocht DE, Homel P, et al. Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study. J Pain. 2007;8(6):460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cakir U, Cete Y, Yigit O, Bozdemir MN. Improvement in physician pain perception with using pain scales. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(6):909–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martin KD, Van Buren JP, Wake J, Dawson L. Comparison of visual analog pain score reported to physician vs nurse. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(3):300–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin KD, McBride T, Wake J, Van Buren JP, Dewar C. Comparison of visual analog pain score reported to physician vs nurse in nonoperatively treated foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(12):1444–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Foster D, Shi G, Lesser E, Heckman MG, Whalen J, Forte AJ, et al. A prospective, blinded study comparing in-hospital postoperative pain scores reported by patients to nurses versus physicians. Cureus [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 20];11(11). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903882/

  42. Pisanu C, Franconi F, Gessa GL, Mameli S, Pisanu GM, Campesi I, et al. Sex differences in the response to opioids for pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res. 2019;148: 104447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bhatia A, Sekhon HK, Kaur G. Sex hormones and immune dimorphism. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014: 159150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Austin PJ, Moalem-Taylor G. The neuro-immune balance in neuropathic pain: involvement of inflammatory immune cells, immune-like glial cells and cytokines. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;229(1–2):26–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Calvo M, Dawes JM, Bennett DLH. The role of the immune system in the generation of neuropathic pain. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(7):629–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Halassa MM, Fellin T, Haydon PG. The tripartite synapse: roles for gliotransmission in health and disease. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13(2):54–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pocock JM, Kettenmann H. Neurotransmitter receptors on microglia. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(10):527–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Casale R, Atzeni F, Bazzichi L, Beretta G, Costantini E, Sacerdote P, et al. Pain in women: a perspective review on a relevant clinical issue that deserves prioritization. Pain Ther. 2021;10(1):287–314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009;10(5):447–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Loyd DR, Murphy AZ. The neuroanatomy of sexual dimorphism in opioid analgesia. Exp Neurol. 2014;259:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Aloisi AM, Bachiocco V, Costantino A, Stefani R, Ceccarelli I, Bertaccini A, et al. Cross-sex hormone administration changes pain in transsexual women and men. Pain. 2007;132(Suppl 1):S60–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. “Brave men” and “emotional women”: a theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:6358624.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on advancing pain research, care, and education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011 [cited 2021 Jun 28]. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91497/

  54. • Meints SM, Cortes A, Morais CA, Edwards RR. Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain. Pain Manag. 2019;9(3):317–34. This article raises awareness of the influence of ethnicity and race on the experience, assessment, and treatment of pain.

  55. Ostrom C, Bair E, Maixner W, Dubner R, Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, et al. Demographic predictors of pain sensitivity: results from the OPPERA study. J Pain. 2017;18(3):295–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Anderson KO, Green CR, Payne R. Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: causes and consequences of unequal care. J Pain. 2009;10(12):1187–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Carey TS, Garrett JM. The relation of race to outcomes and the use of health care services for acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(4):390–4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed have made a direct and intellectual contribution to the work and approved for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Shekoohi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Regenerative Pain Medicine/Interventional Pain Medicine

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawji, Y., Almoaswes, H., Bise, C. et al. Electronic Health Record Recording of Patient Pain: Challenges and Discrepancies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 27, 737–745 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01170-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01170-x

Keywords

Navigation