Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

New techniques for the quantification of fibromyalgia and myofascial pain

  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Myofascial pain and fibromyalgia share a number of common features: the patient is uncomfortable; abnormalities can be detected on physical examination; and there is a lack of an objective means to either quantify or visualize their core features. This has undoubtedly contributed to a slowed acceptance of their importance by the medical community. Fortunately, the situation is beginning to change. Although progress may be somewhat slower in fibromyalgia, in which attention appears to focus on pain sensitivity and functional brain imaging, a number of approaches now seem promising in their ability to quantify the physical and biochemical characteristics of the taut bands and trigger points of myofascial pain. This review focuses on myofascial pain with an emphasis on the growing capability of MRI, microanalytic techniques, and ultrasonography to assess, quantitate, and even visualize the characteristics of these stigmatic lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Alvarez DJ, Rockwell PG: Trigger points: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2002, 65:653–660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerwin RD: Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001, 5:412–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simons D: Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004, 14:95–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simons DG: New views of myofascial trigger points: etiology and diagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:157–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheeler AH: Myofascial pain disorders: theory to therapy. Drugs 2004, 64:45–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lew PC, Lewis J, Story I: Inter-therapist reliability in locating latent myofascial trigger points using palpation. Man Ther 1997, 2:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfe F, Simons DG, Friction JR, et al.: The fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes: a preliminary study of tender points and trigger points in persons with fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome and no disease. J Rheumatol 1992, 19:944–951.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerwin RD, Shannon S, Hong CZ, et al.: Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain 1997, 69:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraft GH, Johnson E, LaBan MM: The fibrositis syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1968, 49:155–162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Awad EA: Interstitial myofibrositis: hypothesis of the mechanism. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1973, 54:449–453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brendstrup P, Jespersen K, Asboe-Hansen G: Morphological and chemical connective tissue changes in fibrositic muscles. Ann Rheumatol Dis 1957, 16:438–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer A: Documentation of myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1988, 69:286–291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawchuk G, Herzog W: The reliability and accuracy of a standard method of tissue compliance assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995, 18:298–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, et al.: MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 178:1411–1417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muthupillai R, Lomas D, Rossman P, et al.: Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995, 269:1854–1857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Fidler JL, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic fibrosis: emerging clinical applications. Hepatology 2008, 47:332–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Basford JR, Jenkyn TR, An KN, et al.: Evaluation of healthy and diseased muscle with magnetic resonance elastography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:1530–1536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heers G, Jenkyn T, Alex Dresner M, et al.: Measurement of muscle activity with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Biomech 2003, 18:537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, et al.: Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001, 5:237–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sack I, Bernarding J, Braun J: Analysis of wave patterns in MR elastography of skeletal muscle using coupled harmonic oscillator simulations. Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 20:95–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bensamoun SF, Ringleb SI, Littrell L, et al.: Determination of thigh muscle stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 23:242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Q, Basford J, An KN: Ability of magnetic resonance elastography to assess taut bands. Clin Biomech 2008, 23:623–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Q, Bensamoun S, Basford JR, et al.: Identification and quantification of myofascial taut bands with magnetic resonance elastography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 88:1658–1661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Issberner JP, Schauer CL, Trimmer BA, Walt DR: Combined imaging and chemical sensing of L-glutamate release from the foregut plexus of the lepidopteran, Manduca sexta. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 120:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah JP, Danoff JV, Desai MJ, et al.: Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis J, Tehan P: A blinded pilot study investigating the use of diagnostic ultrasound for detecting active myofascial trigger points. Pain 1999, 79:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ: Sonoelasticity images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990, 16:231–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoyt K, Kneezel T, Castaneda B, Parker KJ: Quantitative sonoelastography for the in vivo assessment of skeletal muscle viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:4063–4080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Jeffrey R. Basford

Authors
  1. Jeffrey R. Basford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai-Nan An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Basford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basford, J.R., An, KN. New techniques for the quantification of fibromyalgia and myofascial pain. Current Science Inc 13, 376–378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-009-0061-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-009-0061-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation