Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using health information technology to improve hypertension management

  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-quality medical care requires implementing evidence-based best practices, with continued monitoring to improve performance. Implementation science is beginning to identify approaches to developing, implementing, and evaluating quality improvement strategies across health care systems that lead to good outcomes for patients. Health information technology has much to contribute to quality improvement for hypertension, particularly as part of multidimensional strategies for improved care. Clinical reminders closely aligned with organizational commitment to quality improvement may be one component of a successful strategy for improving blood pressure control. The ATHENA-Hypertension (Assessment and Treatment of Hypertension: Evidence-based Automation) system is an example of more complex clinical decision support. It is feasible to implement and deploy innovative health information technologies for clinical decision support with features such as clinical data visualizations and evidence to support specific recommendations. Further study is needed to determine the optimal contexts for such systems and their impact on patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

  2. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA: Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003, 290:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gawande A: Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI: Public health. Implementation science. Science 2007, 318:1728–1729.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh J, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, et al.: Hypertension care. In Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies, vol 3, technical review 9. Edited by Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2005. [AHRQ publication no. 04-0051-3.]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh JME, McDonald K, Shojania KG, et al.: Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care 2006, 44:646–657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, et al.: Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135:825–834.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berlowitz DR, Ash AS, Hickey EC, et al.: Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1957–1963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peralta CA, Shlipak MG, Wassel-Fyr C, et al.: Association of antihypertensive therapy and diastolic hypotension in chronic kidney disease. Hypertension 2007, 50:474–480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinman MA, Fischer MA, Shlipak MG, et al.: Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines. Am J Med 2004, 117:747–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose AJ, Shimada SL, Rothendler JA, et al.: The accuracy of clinician perceptions of “usual” blood pressure control. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:180–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perlin JB, Kolodner RM, Roswell RH: The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10:828–836.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal A, Mayo-Smith MF: Adherence to computerized clinical reminders in a large healthcare delivery network. Medinfo 2004, 11:111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fung CH, Woods JN, Asch SM, et al.: Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10:878–885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heidenreich PA, Chacko M, Goldstein MK, Atwood JE: ACE inhibitor reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Med 2005, 118:1034–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heidenreich PA, Gholami P, Sahay A, et al.: Clinical reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction increase use of beta-blockers: a randomized trial. Circulation 2007, 115:2829–2834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett GO, Winickoff RN, Morgan MM, Zielstorff RD: A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Med Care 1983, 21:400–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, et al.: Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:967–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tu K, Davis D: Can we alter physician behavior by educational methods? Lessons learned from studies of the management and follow-up of hypertension. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002, 22:11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray MD, Harris LE, Overhage JM, et al.: Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 2004, 24:324–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, et al.: Improving residents’ compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. JAMA 2000, 284:1411–1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein MK, Lavori P, Coleman R, et al.: Improving adherence to guidelines for hypertension drug prescribing: cluster-randomized controlled trial of general versus patient-specific recommendations. Am J Manag Care 2005, 11:677–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glassman P, Volpp B, Walder D, et al.: Developing electronic clinical reminders for improving hypertension management: the approach of the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Inf Technol Healthcare 2003, 1:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spotswood S: VA On track to eliminate severe high blood pressure. US Medicine, February 2008:1, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agostini JV, Concato J, Inouye SK: Improving sedative-hypnotic prescribing in older hospitalized patients: provider-perceived benefits and barriers of a computer-based reminder. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23(Suppl 1):32–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson ES, Nguyen AD, Halloran JP, Asch SM: Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:50–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, et al.: Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12:438–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sutton DR, Taylor P, Earle K: Evaluation of PROforma as a language for implementing medical guidelines in a practical context. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006, 6:20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Persson M, Mjorndal T, Carlberg B, et al.: Evaluation of a computer-based decision support system for treatment of hypertension with drugs: retrospective, nonintervention testing of cost and guideline adherence. J Intern Med 2000, 247:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ, et al.: Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000, 320:686–690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O: Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999, 17:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi RA, Every NR: A computerized intervention to decrease the use of calcium channel blockers in hypertension. J Gen Intern Med 1997, 12:672–678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peleska J, Svejda D, Zvarova J: Computer supported decision making in therapy of arterial hypertension. Int J Med Inf 1997, 45:25–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Caironi PV, Portoni L, Combi C, et al.: HyperCare: a prototype of an active database for compliance with essential hypertension therapy guidelines. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997:288–292.

  35. Takahashi E, Yoshida K, Izuno T, et al.: Protocol care for hypertension supported by an expert system. MEDINFO 1995, 8:954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van der Lei J, van der Does E, Intveld AJM, et al.: Response of general practitioners to computer-generated critiques of hypertension therapy. Methods Inf Med 1993, 32:146–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Musen MA, Shahar Y, Shortliffe EH: Clinical decision-support systems. In Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Edited by Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. New York: Springer; 2006:698–736.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Musen MA, Tu SW, Das AK, Shahar Y: EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996, 3:367–388.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldstein MK Hoffman BB, Coleman RW, et al.: Implementing clinical practice guidelines while taking account of evidence: ATHENA, an easily modifiable decision-support system for management of hypertension in primary care. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:300–304.

  40. Advani A, Tu S, O’Connor M, et al.: Integrating a modern knowledge-based system architecture with a legacy VA database: the ATHENA and EON Projects at Stanford. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:653–657. http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005810.PDF#search=%22athena%20hypertension%22.

  41. Shankar RD, Martins SB, Tu SW, et al.: Building an explanation function for a hypertension decision-support system. Medinfo 2001, 10:538–542.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goldstein MK, Hoffman BB, Coleman RW, et al.: Patient safety in guideline-based decision support for hypertension management: ATHENA DSS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002, 9(6 Suppl 1):S11–S16. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=419409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Goldstein MK, Hoffman BB: Hypertension recordkeeping and electronic management systems. In Hypertension Primer: The Essentials of High Blood Pressure. Edited by Izzo JL, Black HR, Sica DA. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:428–431.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Goldstein MK, Coleman RW, Tu SW, et al.: Translating research into practice: organizational issues in implementing automated decision support for hypertension in three medical centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:368–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, et al.: Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001, 8:299–308.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheng CH, Goldstein MK, Geller E, Levitt RE: The effects of CPOE on ICU workflow: an observational study. Proc AMIA Symp 2003:150–154.

  47. Martins SB, Lai S, Tu SW, et al.: Offline testing of the ATHENA hypertension decision support system knowledge base to improve the accuracy of recommendations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:539–543.

  48. Chan A, Martins S, Coleman R, et al.: Post fielding surveillance of a guideline-based decision support system. In Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation, vol 1, research findings. Edited by Kerm H, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005:331–339. [AHRQ publication number 05-0021-1.]

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al.: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282:1458–1465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lin ND, Martins SB, Chan AS, et al.: Identifying barriers to hypertension guideline adherence using clinician feedback at the point of care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:494–498.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center 182B, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA

    Mary K. Goldstein

Authors
  1. Mary K. Goldstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary K. Goldstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldstein, M.K. Using health information technology to improve hypertension management. Current Science Inc 10, 201–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-008-0038-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-008-0038-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation