Skip to main content
Log in

Secondary prevention of stroke by blood pressure-lowering treatment

  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High blood pressure is the most important modiflable risk factor for stroke, accounting for more than 50% of the population-attributable fraction for stroke. There is now strong evidence from randomized trials that blood pressure-lowering treatment is one of the most effective and generalizable strategies for secondary prevention of stroke. Once the patient with stroke has stabilized, all patients should receive blood pressure-lowering therapy, irrespective of their blood pressure levels. Combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor plus a diuretic is an established regimen, but an angiotensin II-receptor blocker may provide an alternative regimen in patients who do not tolerate an ACE inhibitor, especially in combination with a diuretic. For patients with previous stroke, goal blood pressures of < 130/80 mm Hg in hypertensive subjects and < 120/80 mm Hg in normotensive (or “prehypertensive”) subjects should be achieved using combination blood pressure-lowering therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. World Health Organization: The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hankey G, Warlow C: Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations. Lancet 1999, 354:1457–1463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party: National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke, 2nd ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams RJ, Chimowitz MI, Alpert JS, et al.: Coronary risk evaluation in patients with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2003, 34:2310–2322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokmen E, Whisnant JP, O’Fallon WM, et al.: Dementia after ischemic stroke: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota (1960-1984). Neurology 1996, 46:154–159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M: Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke 1997, 28:785–792.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization: Preventing Chronic Disease: A Vital Investment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization: World Health Report 2002: reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration: Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectivelydesigned overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003, 362:1527–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rashid P, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P: Blood pressure reduction and secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular events: a systematic review. Stroke 2003, 34:2741–2748. A systematic review summarizing previous randomized controlled trials of blood pressure lowering treatment for secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, et al.: Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990, 335:765–774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Prospective Studies Collaboration: Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002, 360:1903–1913. A systematic review summarizing observational studies demonstrating the association of blood pressure with stroke mortality.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration: Blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. J Hypertens 2003, 21:707–716. A systematic review summarizing observational studies in the Asia-Pacific region demonstrating the association of blood pressure with stroke risk.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodgers A, MacMahon S, Gamble G, et al.: for the United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack Collaborative Group: Blood pressure and risk of stroke in patients with cerebrovascular disease. BMJ 1996, 20:147. An observational study demonstrating the association of blood pressure with recurrent stroke risk.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irie K, Yamaguchi T, Minematsu K, Omae T: The J-curve phenomenon in stroke recurrence. Stroke 1993, 24:1844–1849.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MacMahon S, Rodgers A, Neal B, Chalmers J: Blood pressure lowering for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke. Hypertension 1997, 29:537–538.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arima H, Chalmers J, Woodward M, et al.: for the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial. J Hypertens 2006, 24:1201–1208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. PATS Collaborating Group: Post-stroke antihypertensive treatment study: a preliminary result. Chin Med J 1995, 108:710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The INDANA (Individual Data Analysis of Antihypertensive Intervention Trials) Project Collaborators: Effect of antihypertensive treatment in patients having already suffered from stroke: gathering the evidence. Stroke 1997, 28:2557–2562.

    Google Scholar 

  20. PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood pressure lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001, 358:1033–1041. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of blood pressure-lowering treatment for secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MacMahon S, Rodgers A, Neal B, et al.: on behalf of the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: The lowering of blood pressure after stroke. Lancet 2001, 358:1994–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chapman N, Huxley R, Anderson C, et al.: for the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Effects of a perindopril-based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke according to stroke subtype and medical history: the PROGRESS trial. Stroke 2004, 35:116–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Effects of a perindoprilbased blood pressure-lowering regimen on disability and dependency in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2003, 34:2333–2338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Effects of a perindoprilbased blood pressure lowering regimen on cardiac outcomes among patients with cerebrovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2003, 24:475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  25. PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:1069–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodgers A, Chapman N, Woodward M, et al.: on behalf of the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Perindopril-based blood pressure lowering in individuals with cerebrovascular disease: consistency of benefits by age, sex and region. J Hypertens 2004, 22:653–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berthet K, Neal BC, Chalmers JP, et al.: on behalf of the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Reductions in the risks of recurrent stroke in patients with and without diabetes: the PROGRESS trial. Blood Press 2004, 13:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arima H, Hart RG, Colman S, et al.: for the PROGRESS Collaborative Group: Perindopril-based blood pressurelowering reduces major vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2005, 36:2164–2169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith SC Jr, Blair SN, Bonow RO, et al.: AHA/ACC guidelines for preventing heart attack and death in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: 2001 update: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2001, 104:1577–1579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. International Society of Hypertension Writing Group: International Society of Hypertension (ISH): statement on blood pressure lowering and stroke prevention. J Hypertens 2003, 21:651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. National Stroke Foundation of Australia: National Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation of Australia; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stroke Foundation New Zealand: Life After Stroke: New Zealand Guideline for Management Stroke. Wellington: Stroke Foundation New Zealand; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee and the EUSI Writing Committee: European Stroke Initiative recommendations for stroke management: update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003, 16:311–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration: Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002, 324:71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group: Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions. Lancet 2004, 363:757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators: Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005, 366:1267–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pedelty L, Gorelick PB: Chronic management of blood pressure after stroke. Hypertension 2004, 44:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, et al.: the BHS guidelines working party, for the British Hypertension Society: British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary. BMJ 2004, 328:634–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization International Society of Hypertension Writing Group: 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003, 21:1983–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guidelines Committee: European Society of Hypertension —European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003, 21:1011–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chobanian A, Bakris G, Black H, et al.: and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003, 289:2560–2572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dahlof B, Devereux R, Kjeldsen S, et al.: for the LIFE study group: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002, 359:995–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, et al.: for the MOSES Study Group: Morbidity and mortality after stroke, eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomised controlled study (MOSES). Stroke 2005, 36:1218–1226. A randomized trial comparing an angiotensin II receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker for secondary prevention of stroke.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration: The comparative effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Submitted for publication.

  45. Carter A: Hypotensive therapy in stroke survivors. Lancet 1970, 1:485–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hypertension Stroke Cooperative Study Group: Effect of antihypertensive treatment on stroke recurrence. JAMA 1974, 229:409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group: Trial of secondary prevention with atenolol after transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke. Stroke 1993, 24:543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Eriksson S, Olofsson B-O, Wester P-O: Atenolol in secondary prevention after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995, 5:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  49. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators: Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Chalmers MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arima, H., Chalmers, J. Secondary prevention of stroke by blood pressure-lowering treatment. Current Science Inc 8, 317–323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-006-0071-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-006-0071-2

Keywords

Navigation