Abstract
Domestic violence cuts across all demographic groups. The factors related to why police officers arrest in some domestic violence situations but not others have been often studied. Little research, however, has been conducted on the arrest views of rural police officers. One hundred seventy line officers in six rural Midwestern counties were surveyed to determine the impact of officer personal characteristics and agency type on arrest decisions in various hypothetical domestic violence scenarios. First, the same situational factors appeared to be important in shaping the arrest decision in domestic violence calls of rural officers as have previously been found with urban officers. Second, the characteristics of officers and the type of agency had some impact on the likelihood of arrest, particularly if there was evidence of a physical assault. Third, the presence of evidence of a physical assault helped shape the arrest decisions of rural officers. Fourth, situational factors were more important than officer characteristics and the type of agency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avakame E, Fyfe J (2001) Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence: Additional evidence on the leniency thesis. Violence Against Women 7:22–45
Bass J (1995) Rural policing: Patterns and problems of “micro” departments. Justice Prof 9:59–74
Belknap J (1995) Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about the appropriate response to woman battering. Int Rev Vict 4:47–62
Bourg S, Stock H (1994) A review of domestic violence arrest statistics in a police department using a pro-arrest policy: Are pro-arrest policies enough? J Fam Violence 9:177–189
Breci M, Simons R (1987) An examination of organizational and individual factors that influence police response to domestic disturbances. J Police Sci Adm 15:93–104
Cramer E (1999) Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. J Interpers Violence 14:1137–1150
EDK Associates (1992) EDK opinion survey of public attitudes toward domestic violence. Family Violence Prevention Fund, New York, NY
Felder L (1997) Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Women Crim Justice 8(4):79–98
Finn M, Stalans L (1995) Police referrals to shelters and mental health treatment: Examining their decisions in domestic assault cases. Crime Delinq 41:467–480
Finn M, Blackwell B, Stalans L, Studdard S, Dugan L (2004) Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of department policies. Crime Delinq 50:565–589
Friday P, Metzgar S, Walters D (1991) Policing domestic violence: Perceptions, experience, and reality. Crim Justice Rev 16:198–213
Hall D (2005) Domestic violence arrest decision making: The role of suspect availability in the arrest decision. Crim Justice Behav 32:390–411
Hartman J, Belknap J (2003) Beyond the gatekeepers: Court professionals’ self-reported attitudes and experiences with misdemeanor domestic violence cases. Crim Justice Behav 30:349–373
Homant R, Kennedy D (1985) Police perceptions of spouse abuse: A comparison of male and female officers. J Crim Justice 13:29–47
Kane R (1999) Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: Identifying a police decision-making model. J Crim Justice 27:65–79
Lutze FE, Symons ML (2003) The evolution of domestic violence policy through masculine institutions. Criminol Public Policy 2:319–328
Mignon S, Holmes W (1995) Police response to mandatory arrest laws. Crime Delinq 41:430–442
Roberg R, Bonn S (2004) Higher education and policing: Where are we now? Policing 27:469–486
Robinson A (2000) The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Crim Justice Behav 27:600–624
Robinson A, Chandek M (2000) The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime Delinq 46:18–37
Saunders D (1995) The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. J Interpers Violence 10:147–158
Saunders D, Size P (1986) Attitudes about women abuse among police officers, victims, and victim’s advocates. J Int Abuse 1:25–42
Sherman L, Berk R (1984) The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. Am Sociol Rev 49:261–272
Sims V (1988) Small town and rural police. Chas C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
Sinden P, Stephens B (1999) Police perceptions of domestic violence: The nexus of victim, perpetrator, event, self, and law. Policing: Int’l J Policing Strag Mgmt 22:313–326
Stalans L, Finn M (2000) Gender differences in officers’ perceptions and decisions about domestic violence cases. Women Crim Justice 11:1–24
Tjaden P, Thoennes N (1998) Prevalence, incidence, and consequence of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F. Supp 1521 (D. Conn. 1984)
Waaland P, Keeley S (1985) Police decision making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors. Law Hum Behav 9:355–366
Websdale N, Johnson B (1997) The policing of domestic violence in rural and urban areas: The voices of battered women in Kentucky. Policing Soc 6:297–317
Weisheit R, Falcone D, Wells E (1994) Rural crime and rural policing. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
Younglove J, Kerr M, Vitello C (2002) Law enforcement officers’ perceptions of same sex domestic violence: Reason for cautious optimism. J Interpers Violence 17:760–772
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Nancy Hogan and Shannon Barton contributed equally to the paper. The authors thank Janet Lambert for editing and proofreading the paper. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L., Barton, S.M. et al. The Impact of Officer and Agency Characteristics on the Likelihood of Arrest in Domestic Violence Situations among Rural Law Enforcement Officers. J Police Crim Psych 22, 91–101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9011-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9011-6