Skip to main content
Log in

Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Enteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods.

Recent Findings

There are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes.

Summary

The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. McClave SA, Heyland DK. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24(3):305–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533609335176. This study investigates the types and rates of complications in fluroscopically vs endoscopically placed gastrostomy tubes.

  2. Mundi MS, Pattinson A, McMahon MT, Davidson J, Hurt RT. Prevalence of Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in the United States. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32(6):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533617718472. This study highlights the timeliness of this review given the increasing rates of enteral feeding in the United States.

  3. Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr. RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatric Surg. 1980:15.6:872–875. This study emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to enteral nutrition and outpatient care coordination given the increased rates of hospital readmissions in this population.

  4. Jain R, Maple JT, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Fanelli RD, Fisher L, Fukami N, Ikenberry SO, Jue T. The role of endoscopy in enteral feeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7739–51. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Duszack R, Mabry MR. National trends in gastrointestinal access procedures: an analysis of Medicare services provided by radiologists and other specialists. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:1031–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Day LW, Nazareth M, Sewell JL, Williams JL, Lieberman DA. Practice variation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: trends and predictors among providers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(1):37–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McClave SA. Techniques in enteral access. Clinical gastrointestinal endoscopy. 3rd Edition. 2019. Chapter 42, pp. 467–87.

  9. Given M, Hanson J, Lee M. Interventional Radiology Techniques for Provision of Enteral Feeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:692–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-7021-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bendel EC, McKusick MA, Fleming CJ, et al. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy catheter placement without gastropexy: a co-axial balloon technique and evaluation of safety and efficacy. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:2227–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0808-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma S, Lamparello NA, Paik H, Nadolski G, Stavropoulos W, Tischfield D, Gade T, Shlansky-Goldberg R. Single-step method for pull-type gastrostomy tube placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(3):473–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark JA, Pugash RA, Pantalone RR. Radiologic Peroral Gastrostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(7):927–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Itkin M, DeLegge MH, Fang JC, McClave SA, Kundu S, Janne d'Othee B, Martinez-Salazar GM, Sacks D, Swan TL, Towbin RB, Walker TG, Wojak JC, Zuckerman DA, Cardella JF; Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association; American Gastroenterological Association Institute; Canadian Interventional Radiological Association; Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the Society of Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, with endorsement by Canadian Interventional Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(8):1089–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2011.04.006.

  14. Overhagen HV, Schipper J. Percutaneous jejunostomy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21(3):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-860878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barkmeier JM, Trerotola SO, Wiebke EA, Sherman S, Harris VJ, Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Rogers WJ, Zhou XH. Percutaneous radiologic, surgical endoscopic, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy: comparative study and cost analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;21:324–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McClave SA, Chang WK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;17(179–96):ix.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2007;16:407–18.

  18. Tischfield DJ, Nadolski GJ, Hunt SJ, et al. Retrospective comparison of outcomes and associated complications between large bore radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube types. Abdom Radiol. 2019;44:318–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1717-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wollman B, D’Agostino HB, Walus-Wigle JR, Easter DW, Beale A. Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Radiology. 1995;197(3):699–704. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perona F, Castellazzi G, De Iuliis A, Rizzo L. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy: a 12-year series. Gut Liver. 2010;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44–9. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2010.4.S1.S44.

  21. Szymski GX, Albazzaz AN, Funaki B, Rosenblum JD, Hackworth CA, Zernich BW, Leef JA. Radiologically guided placement of pull-type gastrostomy tubes. Radiology. 1997;205(3):669–73. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zener R, Istl AC, Wanis KN, David Hocking, Jacob Kachura, Shaker Alshehri, Amol Mujoomdar, Steven Latosinsky, Daniele Wiseman. Thirty-day complication rate of percutaneous gastrojejunostomy and gastrostomy tube insertion using a single-puncture, dual-anchor technique. Clin Imaging. 2018;50:104–108.

  23. Kohli DR, Kennedy KF, Desai M, Sharma P. Comparative safety of endoscopic vs radiologic gastrostomy tube placement: Outcomes from a large, nationwide Veterans Affairs database. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(12):2367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cosentini EP, Sautner T, Gnant M, Winkelbauer F, Teleky B, Jakesz R. Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies. Arch Surg. 1998;133(10):1076–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Silas AM, Pearce LF, Lestina LS, Grove MR, Tosteson A, Manganiello WD, Bettman MA, Gordon SR. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Palchaudhuri S, Mehta SJ, Snider CK, Hudson L, Wu GD, Pickett-Blakely O. Hospital discharge on enteral nutrition is associated with increased hospital readmissions. J Am Nutr Assoc. 2023;42(2):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2021.2022034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MacLean AA, Alvarez NR, Davies JD, Lopez PP, Pizano LR. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic and fluoroscopic gastrostomy tube insertion procedures in 378 patients. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2007;30(5):337–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gleeson FC, Lee JH, Dewitt JM. Tumor seeding associated with selected gastrointestinal endoscopic interventions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(9):1385–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pickhardt PJ, Rohrmann CA Jr, Cossentino MJ. Stomal metastases complicating percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: CT findings and the argument for radiologic tube placement. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(3):735–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bankhead RR, Fisher CA, Rolandelli RH. Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20(6):607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apeksha Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Erica Knavel Koepsel has no relevant conflicts of interest.

Mike Woods has no relevant conflicts of interest.

Apeksha Shah participated in the Nestle Nutrition Institute Clinical Nutrition Fellowship.

Rebecca Busch participated in the Nestle Nutrition Institute Clinical Nutrition Fellowship.

Mohamed Eisa participated in the Nestle Nutrition Institute Clinical Nutrition Fellowship.

Sonali Palchaudhuri participated in the Nestle Nutrition Institute Clinical Nutrition Fellowship.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, A., Busch, R.A., Koepsel, E.K. et al. Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 25, 175–181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x

Keywords

Navigation