Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolving diagnostic modalities in inflammatory bowel disease

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past several years, significant advances have been made in the diagnostic techniques used in the management of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. These advances have occurred mainly in the area of gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiology. Capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy have permitted better visualization of the small bowel mucosa. Advanced imaging techniques, including chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, confocal endomicroscopy, and spectroscopy, may aid in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in patients with long-standing disease. Improved radiographic imaging techniques based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging allow noninvasive means of evaluating the small bowel in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease. Finally, positron emission tomography is an investigative tool for inflammatory bowel disease that may also aid in the detection of inflammation in these diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lashner B: Clinical features, laboratory findings, and course of Crohn’s disease. In Inflammatory Bowel Disease, edn 5. Edited by Kirsner J. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000:305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowicz S, et al.: Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:2776–2779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E, et al.: Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut 2003, 52:390–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herrerias J, Caunedo A, Rodriguez-Tellez M, et al.: Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease and negative endoscopy. Endoscopy 2003, 35:564–568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arguelles-Arias F, Caunedo A, Romero J, et al.: The value of capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients with a suspicion of Crohn’s disease. Endoscopy 2004, 36:869–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ge Z, Hu Y, Xiao S: Capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2004, 10:1349–1352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mow W, Lo S, Targan S, et al.: Initial experience with wireless capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalantzis N, Papnikolaou I, Giannakoulopoulou E, et al.: Capsule endoscopy: the cumulative experience from its use in 193 patients with suspected small bowel disease. Hepatogastroenterology 2005, 52:414–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Costamagna G, Shah S, Riccioni M, et al.: A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 123:999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubcenco E, Jeejeebhoy K, Petroniene R, et al.: Diagnosing Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: should capsule endoscopy be used? CE vs. other diagnostic modalities [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:AB 174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eliakim R, Suissa A, Yassin K, et al.: Wireless capsule video endoscopy compared to barium follow-through and computerised tomography in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease - final report. Dig Liver Dis 2004, 36:519–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toth E, Fork F, Almqvist P, et al.: Wireless capsule enteroscopy: a comparison with enterography, push enteroscopy and ileocolonoscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:AB 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chong A, Taylor A, Miller A, et al.: Capsule endoscopy vs. push enteroscopy and enteroclysis in suspected small-bowel Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:255–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hara A, Leighton J, Heigh R, et al.: Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: preliminary comparison of CT enterography, capsule endoscopy, small-bowel follow-through and ileoscopy. Radiology 2005, in press.

  15. Bloom P, Rosenberg M, Klein S, et al.: Wireless capsule endoscopy is more informative than ileoscopy and SBFT for the evaluation of the small intestine in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease. Presented at International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy. Berlin; March 23–25, 2003.

  16. Golder S, Schreyer A, Endlicher E, et al.: Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005, Apr 22; [Epub ahead of print].

  17. Buchman A, Miller F, Wallin A, et al.: Videocapsule endoscopy versus barium contrast studies for the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease recurrence involving the small intestine. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:2171–2177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco M, et al.: Wireless capsule endoscopy vs. small bowel enteroclysis in the detection of ileal involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective controlled trial [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:AB177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voderholzer W, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P, et al.: Small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and computed tomography enteroclysis. Gut 2005, 54:369–373. This prospective study compared capsule endoscopy with CT enteroclysis for evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease. The study showed a higher yield for capsule endoscopy, which led to a change in therapy in a significant number of patients.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Triester S, Leighton J, Leontiadis G, et al.: A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:S271-S272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Solem C, Loftus E, Fletcher J, et al.: Small bowel (SB) imaging in Crohn’s disease (CD): a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:A-74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldfarb N, Pizzi L, Fuhr J, et al.: Diagnosing Crohn’s disease: an economic analysis comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with traditional diagnostic procedures. Dis Manag 2004, 7:292–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lo S, Zaidel O, Tabibzadeh S, et al.: Utility of wireless capsule enteroscopy (WCE) and IBD serology in re-classifying indeterminate colitis (IC). Gastroenterology 2003, 124:S1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mascarenhas-Saraiva M, Baldaque-Silva F, Villas-Boas G, Soares J: Capsule endoscopy: a valuable help for the differential diagnosis of indeterminate colitis? Gastroenterology 2003, 124:M1888.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hume G, Whittaker D, Radford-Smith G, Appleyard M: Can capsule endoscopy (CE) help differentiate the aetiology of indeterminate colitis (IC)? Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, FL; 2004:38A.

  26. Goldstein J, Eisen G, Lewis B, et al.: Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 3:133–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham D, Opekun A, Willingham F, Qureshi W: Visible smallintestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 3:55–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheifetz A, Kornbluth A, Legnani P, et al.: Incidence and outcome of the retained video capsule endoscope (CE) in Crohn’s disease (CD): is it a "therapeutic complication" [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:S262.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, et al.: Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:216–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al.: Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:1010–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. May A, Nachbar L, Ell C: Double-balloon enteroscopy (pushand-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:62–70. This is the largest single-center series evaluating the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of double-balloon enteroscopy for small bowel diseases.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lo S, Ross A, Leighton J, et al.: The first U.S. multicenter study on double-balloon enteroscopy. Presented at United European Gastroenterology Week 2005.

  33. Kudo S, Rubio C, Teixeira C, et al.: Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 2001, 33:367–373.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dekker E, Fockens P: New endoscopic tools for the IBD physician. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004, 10:S7-S10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M, et al.: Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:880–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutter M, Saunders B, Schofield G, et al.: Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gut 2004, 53:256–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, et al.: Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:706–713. This paper evaluates the ability of confocal laser endoscopy to predict histology during screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Schneider C, et al.: Confocal endomicroscopy as a novel method to diagnose colitis associated neoplasias in ulcerative colitis: a prospective randomized trial [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:A-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Machida H, Sano Y, Yoshida S, et al.: Novel diagnostic method based on color imaging using narrow band imaging system in the colon. Presented at Digestive Disease Week. Orlando, FL, May 18–21, 2003; abstract T1468.

  40. Dekker E, Ennahachi M, Kara M, et al.: Narrow band imaging (NBI) for improved pit pattern imaging in colonic polyps [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:A625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dekker E, van Deventer S, Hardwick J, et al.: The value of narrow band imaging for the detection of dysplasia in longstanding ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:A77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Messmann H, Endlicher E, Freunek G, et al.: Fluorescence endoscopy for the detection of low and high grade dysplasia in ulcerative colitis using systemic or local 5-aminolaevulinic acid sensitisation. Gut 2003, 52:1003–1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cirillo L, Camera L, Della Noce M, et al.: Accuracy of enteroclysis in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol 2000, 10:1894–1898.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Carucci L, Levine M: Radiographic imaging of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2002, 31:93–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Choi D, Jin Lee S, Ah Cho Y, et al.: Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn’s disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin Radiol 2003, 58:68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zalis M, Singh A: Imaging of inflammatory bowel disease: CT and MR. Dig Dis 2004, 22:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wold P, Fletcher J, Johnson C, Sandborn W: Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy—feasibility study. Radiology 2003, 229:275–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Raptopoulos V, Schwartz R, McNicholas M, et al.: Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol 1997, 169:1545–1550.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Battolla L, et al.: Crohn disease of the small bowel: spiral CT evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001, 25:612–616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang L, Zhang S, Hu H, et al.: Multi-detector CT enterography with iso-osmotic mannitol as oral contrast for detecting small bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:2324–2329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hassan C, Cerro P, Zullo A, et al.: Computed tomography enteroclysis in comparison with ileoscopy in patients with Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003, 18:121–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tarjan Z, Zagoni T, Gyorke T, et al.: Spiral CT colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol 2000, 35:193–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Biancone L, Fiori R, Tosti C, et al.: Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for stricturing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003, 9:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Passariello R: Small bowel. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005, 13:331–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rieber A, Wruk D, Potthast S, et al.: Diagnostic imaging in Crohn’s disease: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000, 15:176–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Darbari A, Sena L, Argani P, et al.: Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004, 10:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ochsenkuhn T, Herrmann K, Schoenberg S, et al.: Terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004, 10:953–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, et al.: Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn’s disease. Gut 2003, 52:393–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ajaj W, Lauenstein T, Pelster G, et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut 2005, 54:257–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Neurath M, Vehling D, Schunk K, et al.: Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1978–1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lemberg D, Issenman R, Cawdron R, et al.: Positron emission tomography in the investigation of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005, 11:733–738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, 85259, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

    Jonathan A. Leighton MD

Authors
  1. Jonathan A. Leighton MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward V. Loftus Jr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leighton, J.A., Loftus, E.V. Evolving diagnostic modalities in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7, 467–474 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0078-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0078-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation