Correction to: Current Diabetes Reports (2019) 19: 61

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1178-6

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In Table 1, in the footnote section:

“†Unique primary preven5on se6ng of ‘extreme’ ASCVD risk” should read: “†Unique primary prevention setting of ‘extreme’ ASCVD risk”