Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Academic and Government Partnerships to Address Diabetes in the USA: a Narrative Review

  • Economics and Policy in Diabetes (ES Huang and AA Baig, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Multi-sector partnerships are broadly considered to be of value for diabetes prevention and management. The purpose of this article is to summarize academic and government collaborations focused on diabetes prevention and management.

Recent Findings

Using a narrative review approach, we identified 17 articles describing 10 academic and government partnerships for diabetes management and surveillance. Challenges and gaps in the literature include complexity of diabetes management vis a vis current healthcare infrastructure; a paucity of racial/ethnic diversity in translational efforts; and the time/effort needed to maintain strong relationships across partner institutions.

Summary

Academic and government partnerships are of value for diabetes prevention and management activities. Acknowledgment that the key priorities of government programming are often costs and feasibility is critical for collaborations to be successful. Future translational efforts of diabetes prevention and management programs should focus on the following: (1) expansion of partnerships between academia and local health departments; (2) increased utilization of implementation science for enhanced and efficient implementation and dissemination; and (3) harnessing of technological advances for data analysis, patient communication, and report generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Crude and age-adjusted incidence of diagnosed diabetes per 1,000 population aged 18–79 years, United States, 1980–2011. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/incidence/fig2.htm. Accessed Accessed Aug 26, 2014.

  2. Geiss LS, Pan L, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, Benjamin SM, Engelgau MM. Changes in incidence of diabetes in U.S. adults, 1997-2003. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(5):371–7. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Diabetes A. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):1033–46. doi:10.2337/dc12-2625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–86. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.

  5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.

  6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703–13.

  7. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):117–25. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60104-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohiuddin SM, Mooss AN, Hunter CB, Grollmes TL, Cloutier DA, Hilleman DE. Intensive smoking cessation intervention reduces mortality in high-risk smokers with cardiovascular disease. Chest. 2007;131(2):446–52. doi:10.1378/chest.06-1587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2643–53. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Prevention Program. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/about/index.html. Accessed November 9, 2016.

  12. Albright AL, Gregg EW. Preventing type 2 diabetes in communities across the U.S.: the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4 Suppl 4):S346–51. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vojta D, Koehler TB, Longjohn M, Lever JA, Caputo NF. A coordinated national model for diabetes prevention: linking health systems to an evidence-based community program. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4 Suppl 4):S301–6. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Prevention Program. Registry of Recognized Organizations. https://nccd.cdc.gov/DDT_DPRP/Registry.aspx. Accessed March 28, 2017.

  15. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, Cowie CC, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(17):1613–24. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1213829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenfant C. Shattuck lecture—clinical research to clinical practice—lost in translation? N Engl J Med. 2003;349(9):868–74. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa035507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ali MK, Echouffo-Tcheugui J, Williamson DF. How effective were lifestyle interventions in real-world settings that were modeled on the Diabetes Prevention Program? Health Aff. 2012;31(1):67–75. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tabak RG, Sinclair KA, Baumann AA, Racette SB, Sebert Kuhlmann A, Johnson-Jennings MD, et al. A review of diabetes prevention program translations: use of cultural adaptation and implementation research. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(4):401–14. doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0341-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Institute of Medicine. The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC2002.

  21. Keck CW. Lessons learned from an academic health department. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000;6(1):47–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Livingood WC, Goldhagen J, Little WL, Gornto J, Hou T. Assessing the status of partnerships between academic institutions and public health agencies. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(4):659–66. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.083188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. • Neri EM, Ballman MR, Lu H, Greenlund KJ, Grunbaum JA. Academic-health department collaborative relationships are reciprocal and strengthen public health practice: results from a study of academic research centers. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20(3):342–8. doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a152c6. Provides helpful background on the CDC Prevention Research Center program—which fosters collaborations between academia and local health departments.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Erwin PC, Barlow P, Brownson RC, Amos K, Keck CW. Characteristics of academic health departments: initial findings from a cross-sectional survey. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(2):190–3. doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. A unique partnership: The University at Albany’s School of Public Health and New York State Department of Health. http://www.albany.edu/healthsciences/ualbany-nysdoh-partnership.php. Accessed March 30, 2017.

  26. Public Health Foundation. Academic Health Department Partnership Agreements. http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Pages/AHD_Partnership_Agreements.aspx. Accessed March 30, 2017.

  27. Chin MH, Goddu AP, Ferguson MJ, Peek ME. Expanding and sustaining integrated health care—community efforts to reduce diabetes disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(2 Suppl):29S–39S. doi:10.1177/1524839914532649.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Peek ME, Ferguson M, Bergeron N, Maltby D, Chin MH. Integrated community-healthcare diabetes interventions to reduce disparities. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(3):467. doi:10.1007/s11892-013-0467-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Norris SL, Chowdhury FM, Van Le K, Horsley T, Brownstein JN, Zhang X, et al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):544–56. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01845.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Palmas W, March D, Darakjy S, Findley SE, Teresi J, Carrasquillo O, et al. Community health worker interventions to improve glycemic control in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(7):1004–12. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3247-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shah M, Kaselitz E, Heisler M. The role of community health workers in diabetes: update on current literature. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(2):163–71. doi:10.1007/s11892-012-0359-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev Gen Psychol. 1997;1(3):311–20. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paul MM, Greene CM, Newton-Dame R, Thorpe LE, Perlman SE, McVeigh KH, et al. The state of population health surveillance using electronic health records: a narrative review. Popul Health Manag. 2015;18(3):209–16. doi:10.1089/pop.2014.0093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lopez PM, Islam N, Feinberg A, Myers C, Seidl L., Drackett E et al., 2015. Am J Prev Med. 2016; In press.

  36. Dearinger AT, Ingram RC, Pendley RP, Wilding S. Diabetes education: quality improvement interventions through health departments. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(6):782–6. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Walker EA, Silver LD, Chamany S, Schechter CB, Gonzalez JS, Carrasco J, et al. Baseline characteristics and Latino versus non-Latino contrasts among Bronx A1C study participants. West J Nurs Res. 2014;36(9):1030–51. doi:10.1177/0193945913517947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chamany S, Silver LD, Bassett MT, Driver CR, Berger DK, Neuhaus CE, et al. Tracking diabetes: New York City’s A1C Registry. Milbank Q. 2009;87(3):547–70. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00568.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chamany S, Walker EA, Schechter CB, Gonzalez JS, Davis NJ, Ortega FM, et al. Telephone intervention to improve diabetes control: a randomized trial in the New York City A1c Registry. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(6):832–41. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Ackermann RT, Kenrik Duru O, Albu JB, Schmittdiel JA, Soumerai SB, Wharam JF, et al. Evaluating diabetes health policies using natural experiments: the natural experiments for translation in diabetes study. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):747–54. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.010. Describes newest efforts at the adoption of multi-sector collaborative natural experiments for diabetes prevention and management.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jenkins C, McNary S, Carlson BA, King MG, Hossler CL, Magwood G, et al. Reducing disparities for African Americans with diabetes: progress made by the REACH 2010 Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):322–30. doi:10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Community Health, Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH). https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/reach/. Accessed February 24, 2017.

  43. REACH Detroit Partnership. http://www.reachdetroit.org/. Accessed February 24, 2017.

  44. Spencer MS, Rosland AM, Kieffer EC, Sinco BR, Valerio M, Palmisano G, et al. Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2253–60. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Two Feathers J, Kieffer EC, Palmisano G, Anderson M, Sinco B, Janz N, et al. Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) Detroit partnership: improving diabetes-related outcomes among African American and Latino adults. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1552–60. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.066134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. McClellan L, Schlundt D. Overview of Nashville REACH 2010’s approach to eliminating disparities in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Ambul Care Manage. 2006;29(2):106–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schlundt DG, Greene C, Reid R, McClellan L, Dowling L, Sheats JL, et al. An evaluation of the Nashville REACH 2010 community health screening strategy. J Ambul Care Manage. 2006;29(2):151–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Community Health, REACH 2014 Awardees. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/reach/current_programs/reach.html. Accessed February 24, 2017.

  49. Thorpe LE KR, Chamany S, Chernov C, Freeman A, Gupta L, Frankel M, Perlman S., editor. Change in diabetes prevalence and control in New York City adults: population-based examination surveys, 2004–2014. Epidemiology Congress of the Americas 2016; June 21–24, 2016; Miami FL.

  50. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The NYC Macroscope. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/data/health-tools/nycmacroscope.page. Accessed June 30, 2016.

  51. Thorpe LE, McVeigh KH, Perlman S, Chan PY, Bartley K, Schreibstein L, et al. Monitoring prevalence, treatment, and control of metabolic conditions in New York City adults using 2013 primary care electronic health records: a surveillance validation study. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016;4(1):1266. doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1266.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jones R, Maene C, M. P., Huang E, editors. Use of Dasymetric Areal Interpolation to Estimate the Burden of Diabetes Hospitalization in Chicago Neighborhoods. https://cste.confex.com/cste/2013/webprogram/Paper1712.html. Annual Conference of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; 2013; Pasadena, CA.

  53. Simon PA, Wold CM, Cousineau MR, Fielding JE. Meeting the data needs of a local health department: the Los Angeles County Health Survey. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(12):1950–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Hosler AS, Zeinomar N, Asare K. Diabetes-related services and programs in small local public health departments, 2009-2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E07.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Curtis AB, Kothari C, Paul R, Connors E. Using GIS and secondary data to target diabetes-related public health efforts. Public Health Rep. 2013;128(3):212–20. doi:10.1177/003335491312800311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Drewnowski A, Rehm CD, Moudon AV, Arterburn D. The geography of diabetes by census tract in a large sample of insured adults in King County, Washington, 2005-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E125. doi:10.5888/pcd11.140135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Eggleston EM, Weitzman ER. Innovative uses of electronic health records and social media for public health surveillance. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(3):468. doi:10.1007/s11892-013-0468-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee DC, Long JA, Wall SP, Carr BG, Satchell SN, Braithwaite RS, et al. Determining chronic disease prevalence in local populations using emergency department surveillance. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):e67–74. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Chesla CA, Chun KM, Kwong Y, Gay CL, Chi HL, Gu Y, et al. Cultural adaptation of the group lifestyle balance program for Chinese Americans. Diabetes Educ. 2016;42(6):686–96. doi:10.1177/0145721716666679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hall DL, Lattie EG, McCalla JR, Saab PG. Translation of the diabetes prevention program to ethnic communities in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(2):479–89. doi:10.1007/s10903-015-0209-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Islam NS, Zanowiak JM, Wyatt LC, Chun K, Lee L, Kwon SC, et al. A randomized-controlled, pilot intervention on diabetes prevention and healthy lifestyles in the new York City Korean community. J Community Health. 2013;38(6):1030–41. doi:10.1007/s10900-013-9711-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Islam NS, Zanowiak JM, Wyatt LC, Kavathe R, Singh H, Kwon SC, et al. Diabetes prevention in the New York City Sikh Asian Indian community: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):5462–86. doi:10.3390/ijerph110505462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. O'Brien MJ, Perez A, Alos VA, Whitaker RC, Ciolino JD, Mohr DC, et al. The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a Promotora-Led Diabetes Prevention Program (PL-DPP) in Latinas: a pilot study. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41(4):485–94. doi:10.1177/0145721715586576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Perez A, Alos VA, Scanlan A, Maia CM, Davey A, Whitaker RC, et al. The rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of PREVENT-DM: a community-based comparative effectiveness trial of lifestyle intervention and metformin among Latinas with prediabetes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt B):320–7. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rosas LG, Vasquez JJ, Naderi R, Jeffery N, Hedlin H, Qin F, et al. Development and evaluation of an enhanced diabetes prevention program with psychosocial support for urban American Indians and Alaska natives: a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;50:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2016.06.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Van Name MA, Camp AW, Magenheimer EA, Li F, Dziura JD, Montosa A, et al. Effective translation of an intensive lifestyle intervention for Hispanic women with prediabetes in a community health center setting. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(4):525–31. doi:10.2337/dc15-1899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Williams LB, Sattin RW, Dias J, Garvin JT, Marion L, Joshua T, et al. Design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a diabetes prevention program within African-American churches: The fit body and soul study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;34(2):336–47. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2013.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Yeh MC, Heo M, Suchday S, Wong A, Poon E, Liu G, et al. Translation of the diabetes prevention program for diabetes risk reduction in Chinese immigrants in New York City. Diabet Med. 2016;33(4):547–51. doi:10.1111/dme.12848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shah GH, Sheahan JP. Local health departments’ activities to address health disparities and inequities: are we moving in the right direction? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;13(1) doi:10.3390/ijerph13010044.

  70. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–81. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Tung EL, Peek ME. Linking community resources in diabetes care: a role for technology? Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(7):45. doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0614-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ahmad FS, Tsang T. Diabetes prevention, health information technology, and meaningful use: challenges and opportunities. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4 Suppl 4):S357–63. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruddock JS, Poindexter M, Gary-Webb TL, Walker EA, Davis NJ. Innovative strategies to improve diabetes outcomes in disadvantaged populations. Diabet Med. 2016;33(6):723–33. doi:10.1111/dme.13088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bouchonville MF, Paul MM, Billings J, Kirk JB, Arora S. Taking telemedicine to the next level in diabetes population management: a review of the Endo echo model. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(10):96. doi:10.1007/s11892-016-0784-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hood M, Wilson R, Corsica J, Bradley L, Chirinos D, Vivo A. What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):981–94. doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editors and James Hadler, William Jordan, and Steffie Kinglake for their helpful feedback. This research was supported in part by P60MD000538 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and U48DP005008 and U58DP005621 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave VZN Suite 844, 8th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Stella S. Yi & Lorna Thorpe

  2. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Division of Primary Care and Prevention, New York, NY, USA

    Shadi Chamany

Authors
  1. Stella S. Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shadi Chamany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lorna Thorpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stella S. Yi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Stella S. Yi, Shadi Chamany, and Lorna Thorpe declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Economics and Policy in Diabetes

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, S.S., Chamany, S. & Thorpe, L. Academic and Government Partnerships to Address Diabetes in the USA: a Narrative Review. Curr Diab Rep 17, 75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0895-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0895-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation