Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted that dyspneic patients comprise a high-risk subgroup of patients referred for cardiac stress testing. Even after adjusting for the presence and degree of coronary artery disease the risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality is at least three- to fivefold higher in dyspneic patients compared to asymptomatic or those with chest pain. Stress echocardiography is uniquely positioned to characterize all potential cardiovascular etiologies of dyspnea from global and regional systolic dysfunction, myocardial ischemia to valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension and diastolic dysfunction. Various data point to diastolic dysfunction and associated heart failure as the major potential etiology for dyspnea as well as the likely cause of the heightened mortality risk. Doppler echocardiography at rest and with stress can now characterize the hemodynamics of diastolic dysfunction and close the loop on the comprehensive assessment of the patient who has exertional shortness of breath. This review discusses the role of the Doppler echocardiographic diastolic stress test in the evaluation of patients with cardiac dyspnea.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–8.
Jones RC, Francis GS, Lauer MS. Predictors of mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(5):1025–9.
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531–40.
Abidov A, Rozanski A, Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Aboul-Enein F, Cohen I, Friedman JD, Germano G, Berman DS. Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(18):1889–98.
Senni M, Tribouilloy CM, Rodeheffer RJ, Jacobsen SJ, Evans JM, Bailey KR, Redfield MM. Congestive heart failure in the community: a study of all incident cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 1991. Circulation. 1998;98:2282–9.
Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–9.
Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett Jr JC, et al. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA. 2003;289(2):194–202.
•• Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, et al. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA. 2011;306(8):856–63. This is the first large study to demonstrate the association of the presence or progression of diastolic dysfunction in community subjects with the risk of future heart failure.
Wann LS, Faris JV, Childress RH, Dillon J, Weymann AE, Feigenbaum H. Exercise cross-sectional echocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1979;60:1300–8.
Oh JK, Appleton CP, Hatle LK, et al. The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:246–70.
Oh J. Echocardiography as a noninvasive Swan-Ganz catheter. Circulation. 2005;111:3192–4.
Oh J, Hatle L, Tajik A, Little W. Diastolic heart failure can be diagnosed by comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:500–6.
• Ha JW, Choi D, Park S, et al. Left ventricular diastolic functional reserve during exercise in patients with impaired myocardial relaxation at rest. Heart. 2009;95:399–404. This is an important study addressing the significance of changes of myocardial tissue velocity with stress.
Nagueh S, Middleton K, Kopelen H, Zoghbi W, Quinones M. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1527–33.
•• Oh JK, Park SJ, Nagueh SF. Established and novel clinical applications of diastolic function assessment by echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:444–55. This is a review highlighting current, emerging, and future applications in the assessment of diastolic function.
Nagueh S, Mikari I, Kopelen H, Middleton K, Quinones M, Zoghbi W. Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in sinus tachycardia. A new application of tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation. 1998;98:1644–50.
Sohn D, Song J, Zo J, Chai I, Kim H, Chun H, Kim H. Mitral annulus velocity in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:927–31.
Ommen S, Nishimura R, Appleton C, Miller Jr F, Oh J, Redfield M, Tajik A. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures. Circulation. 2000;102:1788–94.
•• Grewal J, McCully RB, Kane GC, et al. Left ventricular function and exercise capacity. JAMA. 2009;301(3):286–94. Shows a notable association of abnormalities in diastolic function with impairment in exercise capacity in a large cohort of patients without ischemia.
Otto MEB, Pereira MM, Beck AL, Milani M. Correlation between diastolic function and maximal exercise capacity on exercise test. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;96(2):107–13.
Ha JW, Lulic F, Bailey KR, et al. Effects of treadmill exercise on mitral inflow and annular velocities in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(1):114–5.
•• Holland D, Prasad S, Marwick T. Prognostic implications of left ventricular filling pressure with exercise. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:149–56. This is a seminal study demonstrating the prognostic value of the E/e′ ratio with exercise, which is incremental over clinical data and the degree of myocardial ischemia.
Kane GC, Ammash NM, Villarraga HR, Behrenbeck T, Oh JK, McGoon MD, Pellikka PA, McCully RB. Exercise changes in pulmonary artery systolic pressure: normative values from a prospective evaluation of 457 Subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:A4129.
Ha JW, Choi D, Park S, et al. Determinants of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Heart. 2009;95:490–4.
Shim CY, Kin SA, Coi D, et al. Clinical outcomes of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implication of an increase in left ventricular filling pressure during exercise. Heart. 2011;97:1417–24.
Ha JW, Oh JK, Pellikka PA, et al. Diastolic stress echocardiography: a novel noninvasive diagnositic test for diastolic dysfunction using supine bicycle exercise Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:63–8.
Talreja DR, Nishimura RA, Oh JK. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressure with exercise by Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal systolic function: a simultaneous echocardiographic-cardiac catheterization study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(5):477–9.
Burgess MI, Jenkins C, Sharman JE, Marwick TH. Diastolic stress echocardiography: hemodynamic validation and clinical significance of estimation of ventricular filling pressure with exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1891–900.
Hatle L. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2421–3.
Holland DJ, Prasad SB, Marwick TH. Contribution of exercise echocardiography to the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Heart. 2010;96(13):1024–8.
Dokainish H, Nguyen JS, Sengupta R, et al. Do additional echocardiographic variables increase the accuracy of E/e′ for predicting left ventricular filling pressure in normal ejection fraction? An echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:156–61.
Dokainish H, Nguyen JS, Bobeck J, et al. Assessment of the American society of echocardiography-European association of echocardiography guidelines for diastolic function in patients with depressed ejection fraction: an echocardiographic and invasive haemodynamic study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:857–64.
Devereux RB, Wachtell K, Gerdts E, et al. Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA. 2004;292:2350–6.
• Lam CS, Borlaug BA, Kane GC, Enders FT, Rodeheffer RJ, Redfield MM. Age-associated increases in pulmonary artery systolic pressure in the general population. Circulation. 2009;119(20):2663–70. Shows the prognostic implications of elevated pulmonary artery pressure by echocardiography in a community population.
Lam CS, Grewal J, Borlaug BA, et al. Size, shape and stamina. The impact of left ventricular geometry on exercise capacity. Hypertension. 2010;55:1143–9.
Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(12):1284–9.
McCully RB, Roger VL, Mahoney DW, Karon BL, Oh JK, Miller Jr FA, Seward JB, Pellikka PA. Outcome after normal exercise echocardiography and predictors of subsequent cardiac events: follow-up of 1,325 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(1):144–9.
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, et al. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793–801.
Kane GC, Hepinstall MJ, Kidd GM, Kuehl CA, Murphy AT, Nelson JM, Schneider L, Stussy VL, Warmsbecker JA, Miller Jr FA, Pellikka PA, McCully RB. Safety of stress echocardiography supervised by registered nurses: results of a 2-year audit of 15,404 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(4):337–41.
Disclosure
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kane, G.C., Oh, J.K. Diastolic Stress Test for the Evaluation of Exertional Dyspnea. Curr Cardiol Rep 14, 359–365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0269-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0269-7