Abstract
This paper addresses four questions concerning the influence of culture on mathematics teachers’ professional practice. Firstly, drawing on categorical data yielded by the application of low inference coding schedule to video recordings of sequences of lessons taught by case study teachers on four common topics in England, Flanders, Hungary and Spain, we undertook an exploratory factor analysis to examine the ways in which such coded variables interact. This process yielded five factors, each of which was interpretable against the literature and highlighted the extent to which dichotomisations of mathematics teaching as reform or traditional are not necessarily helpful, not least because all project teachers exhibited characteristics of both. Secondly, factors scores were analysed by nationality to reveal culturally located practices resonant with the available literature. Thirdly, cluster analyses yielded four well-defined cross-cultural clusters of episodes, each indicative of particular didactical perspectives that appeared to challenge the exclusivity of these culturally located practices. Finally, the key methodological finding was that the manner in which data are analysed influences greatly the outcomes of comparative mathematics research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For TIMSS, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, see http://timss.bc.edu/ and for PISA, the Programme of International Student Assessment, see http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
References
Anderson, L., Ryan, D., & Shapiro, B. (1989). The IEA classroom environment study. Oxford: Pergamon.
Andrews, P. (2003). Opportunities to learn in the Budapest mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 201–225.
Andrews, P. (2007). Negotiating meaning in cross-national studies of mathematics teaching: Kissing frogs to find princes. Comparative Education, 43(4), 489–509.
Andrews, P. (2011). The cultural location of teachers’ mathematical knowledge: Another hidden variable in mathematics education research? In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 99–118). New York: Springer.
Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2012). Teaching linear equations: Case studies from Finland, Flanders and Hungary. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 476–488.
Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39–68.
Blanco, L. (2003). The mathematical education of primary teachers in Spain. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning. http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/blanco1.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2012.
Cady, J., Meier, S., & Lubinski, C. (2007). The mathematical tale of two teachers: A longitudinal study relating mathematics instructional practices to level of intellectual development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 3–26.
Carver, F., Fuchs, A., Jantzen, K., & Kelso, J. (2002). Spatiotemporal analysis of the neuromagnetic response to rhythmic auditory stimulation: rate dependence and transient to steady-state transition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1921–1931.
Clarke, D. (2006). Using international research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(5), 376–387.
Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). The learner’s perspective study. In D. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspectives (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cogan, L., & Schmidt, W. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 68–85). London: Falmer.
Di Stefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.
Evertson, C. M., Anderson, C. W., Anderson, L. M., & Brophy, J. E. (1980). Relationships between classroom behaviors and student outcomes in junior high mathematics and English classes. American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 43–60.
Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
Givvin, K., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J., Hollingsworth, H., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there national patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Comparative Education Review, 49(3), 311–343.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Henson, R., & Roberts, J. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.
Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3–19.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Hiebert, J., Stigler, J., Jacobs, J., Givvin, K., Garnier, H., et al. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132.
Hufton, N., & Elliott, J. (2000). Motivation to learn: The pedagogical nexus in the Russian school: Some implications for transnational research and policy borrowing. Educational Studies, 26(1), 115–136.
Janssen, R., De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Knoors, E., & Colemont, A. (2002). National assessment of new standards for mathematics in elementary education in Flanders. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 197–225.
Jennings, S., & Dunne, R. (1996). A critical appraisal of the National Curriculum by comparison with the French experience. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(2), 49–55.
Jeon, H.-J., Langill, C., Peterson, C., Luze, G., Carta, J., & Atwater, J. (2010). Children’s individual experiences in early care and education: Relations with overall classroom quality and children’s school readiness. Early Education & Development, 21(6), 912–939.
Kaiser, G., Hino, K., & Knipping, C. (2006). Proposal for a framework to analyse mathematics education traditions in eastern and western traditions. In F. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West, the 13th ICMI study (pp. 319–351). New York: Springer.
Kawanaka, T., Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). Studying mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan and the United States: Lessons from the TIMSS videotape study. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 86–103). London: Falmer.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
La Paro, K., Pianta, R., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). The Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Findings from the prekindergarten year. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 409–426.
Lambert, M., Williams, S., Morrison, J., Samms-Vaughan, M., Mayfield, W., et al. (2008). Are the indicators for the language and reasoning subscale of the early childhood environment rating scale-revised psychometrically appropriate for Caribbean classrooms? International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 41–60.
LeTendre, G., Baker, D., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A. (2001). Teachers’ work: Institutional isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S. Germany, and Japan. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 3–15.
Leu, Y.-C. (2005). The enactment and perception of mathematics pedagogical values in an elementary classroom: Buddhism, Confucianism, and curriculum reform. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 175–212.
Leung, F. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Ma, Y., Zhao, D., & Tuo, Z. (2004). Differences within communities: How is mathematics taught in rural and urban regions in mainland China? In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 413–442). Singapore: World Scientific.
Malmberg, L.-E., Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Colls, H. (2010). Observed classroom quality during teacher education and two years of professional practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 916–932.
Maxwell, B., Pryor, F., & Smith, C. (2002). Cluster analysis in cross-cultural research. World Cultures, 13(1), 22–38.
Osborn, M. (2004). New methodologies for comparative research? Establishing ‘constants’ and ‘contexts’ in educational experience. Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 265–285.
Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Kiuru, N., Siekkinen, M., et al. (2010). A validation of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in Finnish kindergartens. Early Education & Development, 21(1), 95–124.
Peterson, P., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1–40.
Schmidt, W., Jorde, D., Cogan, L., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sharpe, K. (1997). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of Catholicism: Ideological and institutional constraints on system change in English and French primary schooling. Comparative Education, 33(3), 329–348.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Spillane, J., & Zeuli, J. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27.
Stigler, J., Gallimore, R., & Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 87–100.
Stigler, J., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Stigler, J., & Perry, M. (1988). Cross cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: Recent findings and new directions. In D. A. Grouws, T. J. Cooney, & D. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Stipek, D., Givvin, K., Salmon, J., & MacGyvers, V. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.
Szalontai, T. (2000). Some facts and tendencies in Hungarian mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning. http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/tshungmt.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
Szendrei, J., & Török, J. (2007). The tradition and role of proof in mathematics education in Hungary. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school (pp. 117–134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Trawick-Smith, J., Russell, H., & Swaminathan, S. (2011). Measuring the effects of toys on the problem-solving, creative and social behaviours of preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 181(7), 909–927.
Waeytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (1997). Learning to learn: How do teachers differ? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Watters, P. (2002). Discriminating English word senses using cluster analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 9(1), 77–86.
Wong, N.-Y. (2008). Confucian heritage culture learner’s phenomenon: From “exploring the middle zone” to “constructing a bridge”. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(6), 973–981.
Wong, N.-Y. (2009). Exemplary mathematics lessons: What lessons we can learn from them? ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 379–384.
Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 329–338.
Acknowledgments
The Mathematics Education Traditions of Europe (METE) project team acknowledges the financial support of the European Union, Socrates Action 6.1 programme, project code 2002-5048.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrews, P., Sayers, J. Comparative studies of mathematics teaching: does the means of analysis determine the outcome?. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 133–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0481-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0481-3