Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients’ attitudes to bedside teaching after the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bedside teaching (BST) is a method of structured clinical teaching where the patient is central in education. We had previously explored the patients’ perceptions of BST using both a qualitative research study and validation of a questionnaire, both showing strong support by patients for BST once basic rules of respect and confidentiality are followed. With the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical education transitioned to online/virtual learning.

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore patients’ attitudes towards reintroduction of BST as the pandemic restrictions have lifted.

Methods

Patients were invited to complete a validated questionnaire exploring their attitudes towards BST. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results were compared to a previous study performed before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Four hundred patients consented to complete the questionnaires. Participants included women attending for antenatal (40%), postnatal (33%) and gynaecology issues (28%). Most patients (> 94%) reported that they were happy to be involved in BST. Patients believed that they should not be asked to participate in BST should they feel stressed or unwell (69%). These findings were the same as our previous study, performed prior to the pandemic.

Conclusion

This study shows extensive and persisting patient support for BST. BST is unique in that it allows students to gain a deeper understanding of the disease which are hard to elicit through online/virtual methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGee S (2014) A piece of my mind: Bedside teaching rounds reconsidered. Jama 311(19):1971–1972. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.286201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters M, Ten Cate O (2014) Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ 3(2):76–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ (1997) Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Med Educ 31(5):341–346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1997.00673.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rousseau M, Könings KD, Touchie C (2018) Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design. BMC Med Educ 18(1):302. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1403-z

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marwan Y, Al-Saddique M, Hassan A et al (2012) Are medical students accepted by patients in teaching hospitals? Med Educ Online 17:17172. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v17i0.17172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deane RP, Joyce P, Murphy DJ (2015) Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study. BMC Med Educ 15:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0456-5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qureshi Z, Maxwell S (2012) Has bedside teaching had its day? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 17(2):301–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9308-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen MC et al (1997) The effect of bedside case presentations on patients’ perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med 336(16):1150–1155. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704173361606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muething SE, Kotagal UR, Schoettker PJ et al (2007) Family-centered bedside rounds: a new approach to patient care and teaching. Pediatrics 119(4):829–832. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mourad M, Auerbach AD, Maselli J, Sliwka D (2011) Patient satisfaction with a hospitalist procedure service: is bedside procedure teaching reassuring to patients? J Hosp Med 6(4):219–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose S (2020) Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA 323(21):2131–2132. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan MMK, Yu DS, Lam VS, Wong JY (2020) Online clinical training in the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Teach 17(4):445–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13218

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huddart D, Hirniak J, Sethi R et al (2020) #MedStudentCovid: How social media is supporting students during COVID-19. Med Educ 54(10):951–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14215

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone MJ (1995) The wisdom of Sir William Osler. Am J Cardiol 75(4):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(95)80034-p

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stauss M, Breed H, Chatfield K et al (2020) Bedside teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Teach. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dam MV, Ramani S, Ten Cate O (2020) Breathing life into bedside teaching in the era of COVID-19. Med Teach 42(11):1310–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1798368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baecher-Lind L, Fleming AC, Bhargava R et al (2020) Medical education and safety as co-priorities in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) era: we can do both. Obstet Gynecol 136(4):830–834. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carty M, O’Riordan N, Ivers M, Higgins MF (2020) Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital. BMC Med Educ 20(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02016-5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carey MO, O’Riordan N, Carty M et al (2022) Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching. BMC Med Educ 22(152)

  20. Gonzalo JD, Himes J, McGillen B et al (2016) Interprofessional collaborative care characteristics and the occurrence of bedside interprofessional rounds: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 16(1):459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1714-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Artino Jr AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H (2014) Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach 36(6):463–474. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.889814

  22. Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L et al (2020) Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 63. Med Teach 42(11):1202–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1807484

  23. Bari AU (2020) Dermatology residency training in COVID-19 pandemic: transition from traditional to online teaching. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 30(6):63–66. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2020.Supp1.S63

  24. Chao TN, Frost AS, Brody RM et al (2021) Creation of an interactive virtual surgical rotation for undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 78(1):346–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M et al (2020) Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open 10(11):e042378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378

  26. Blaylock BL (2000) Patients and families as teachers: inspiring an empathic connection. Fam Syst Health 18:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bou Malham PSG (2016) The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity. Int J Psychol 51(6):474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HJ made a substantial contribution to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work and drafted the work and gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. CMcB made a substantial contribution to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work and drafted the work and gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. LT made a substantial contribution to the analysis and interpretation of data for the work and revised the work critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. MC made a substantial contributions to the design of the work and interpretation of data for the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. MH made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work and to the interpretation of data for the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary F. Higgins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, H., MacBride, C., Taylor, L. et al. Patients’ attitudes to bedside teaching after the COVID-19 pandemic. Ir J Med Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03558-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03558-5

Keywords

Navigation