Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A 30-year experience of Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: Has this classic operation derived by a President of the College in Ireland stood the test of time?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In patients with large gland volume, open prostatectomy/adenoma enucleation remains a valuable surgical option in treating large obstructing prostates. We report our series of open prostatectomies spanning 32 years from a single institution.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent open prostatectomy between 1980 and 2012. Patient demographical, clinical, pre- and postoperative data and final histology were retrieved from hospital in-patient enquiry system and chart review.

Results

A total of 161 patients underwent Millin’s prostatectomy by seven surgeons between 1980 and 2012. The mean blood loss was 1,381 mls (range 300–3,675 mls). One-third (34 %) of patients (n = 55) received a blood transfusion. The mean weight of prostate tissue removed was 119 g (median 112 g, range 17–372 g). 6.6 % of pathological specimens revealed incidental prostate cancer, of which 78 % were well differentiated (Gleason score ≤ 6). The mean weight of prostate tissue removed in patients who received a transfusion was 124 g. Trial of micturition (TOM) was performed at a mean of 9 days (median 9 days, range 5–25 days) with 94 % of patients having a successful trial of voiding. 6 % of cases early in the series failed to void initially, but did so at later removal of catheter while still in hospital. 45 patients (28 %) of patients developed peri- or postoperative complications. There were three deaths (1.9 %).

Conclusion

Open Millin’s prostatectomy popularized over half a century ago continues to be a valuable option for the surgical treatment of high-volume prostate glands with excellent outcomes for patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serretta V, Morgia G, Fondacaro L et al (2002) Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement in southern Europe in the late 1990s: a contemporary series of 1,800 interventions. Urology 60(4):623–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT et al (1989) Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 141(2):243–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1998) Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol 33:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Fraundorfer MR (2000) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for glands larger than 100 g: an endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. J Endourol 14:529–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Woo HH (2010) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 120-W lithium triborate laser in enlarged prostates (>120 cc). BJU Int 108:860–863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Millin T (1945) Retropubic prostatectomy: a new extravesical prostatectomy. Report on 20 cases. Lancet 246:693–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. (1885) Anonymous. Statistical tables. St Bartholomew’s Hospital Reports, 21: 79

  8. Management of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign prostatic (2011). In EAU guidelines. In: Presented at the 26th EAU Annual Congress. March 18–22, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 978-90-79754-70-0

  9. Zargooshi J (2007) Open prostatectomy for benign prostate hyperplasia: short-term outcome in 3,000 consecutive patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(4):374–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bapat RD, Relekar RG, Pandit SR et al (1991) Comparative study between modified Freyer’s prostatectomy, classical Freyer’s prostatectomy and Millin’s prostatectomy. J Postgrad Med 37(3):144–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adam C, Hofstetter A, Deubner J et al (2004) Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(6):472–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Condie JD Jr, Cutherell L, Mian A (1999) Suprapubic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in rural Asia: 200 consecutive cases. Urology 54(6):1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaeen A, Quinlan D (2004) Feasibility of open simple prostatectomy with early vascular control. BJU Intern 93:349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roos NP, Wennberg JE, Malenka DJ et al (1989) Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 320(17):1120–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol 52(5):1465–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of financial support.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Z. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, R.M., Thomas, A.Z., Browne, C. et al. A 30-year experience of Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: Has this classic operation derived by a President of the College in Ireland stood the test of time?. Ir J Med Sci 184, 341–344 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1115-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1115-2

Keywords

Navigation