Abstract
Background
Unexpected early loosening was noted in some patients who had bipolar hemiarthroplasties using a specific combination of head and stem.
Aim
A review of all patients who had received this implant combination was performed to establish whether there was a higher than expected failure rate and to identify those patients who had evidence of early loosening requiring further intervention or monitoring.
Methods
Theatre records were reviewed to identify those who had undergone bipolar hemiarthroplasty using these products. All surviving patients were contacted and offered an appointment at which they underwent clinical and radiological review. Following review, revision rates were compared to published Australian joint registry data.
Results
Of 247 eligible for recall, 139 attended for clinical and radiological review. The cumulative revision rate was 6.8 % at 4 years, with a mean time to revision of 26 months; however, there was a significantly higher revision rate of 12.1 % in those aged under 75 years at the time of surgery (p = 0.01). This is significantly higher than rates quoted for bipolar hemiarthroplasties in Australian joint registry data.
Conclusion
Overall, higher than expected revision rates due to early loosening were seen for this product combination, especially in patients aged <75 years at the time of the initial surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691–697
Team SIM (2009) National Incident Management Team, Guidance on Conducting Look-Back Reviews HSE
Association AO (2010) HIp and Knee Arthroplasty Annual Report, National Joint Replacement Registry
Registry CJR (2008) Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada 2007–2008 Annual Report
Parker MJ GK (2006) Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults: J Wiley amd Sons Ltd.
Haidukewych GJ IT, Berry DJ, Bhandari M et al. (2002) Long-term survivorship of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res (403):118–26
Victor C (2004) Unipolar versus bipolar arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 19:138–142
Bose WJ MG, Petty W. Victor CR (1995) Osteolysis of the acetabulum associated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty: a late complication. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(11):1733–5
Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, McCoy TH (1998) Failure of the polyethylene after bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(3):420–423
Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016
Oduwole KO, Codd MB, Byrne F, O’Byrne J, Kenny PJ (2008) Irish National Joint Registry: a concept. Ir J Med Sci 177(4):347–353
O’Neill BJ, Nugent M, Cashman JP, O’Flanagan SJ, Keogh P, Kenny PJ (2013) The Irish National Joint Registry: where are we now? Ir J Med Sci
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nugent, M., Galbraith, J.G., Fitzgerald, A.P. et al. Outcomes of a patient recall following early failure of hip hemiarthroplasty. Ir J Med Sci 183, 521–524 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1038-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1038-3