Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Select Surface Processing Techniques for In Situ Application During the Additive Manufacturing Build Process

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although additive manufacturing offers numerous performance advantages for different applications, it is not being used for critical applications due to uncertainties in structural integrity as a result of innate process variability and defects. To minimize uncertainty, the current approach relies on the concurrent utilization of process monitoring, post-processing, and non-destructive inspection in addition to an extensive material qualification process. This paper examines an alternative approach by evaluating the application of select surface process techniques, to include sliding severe plastic deformation (SPD) and fine particle shot peening, on direct metal laser sintering-produced AlSi10Mg materials. Each surface processing technique is compared to baseline as-built and post-processed samples as a proof of concept for surface enhancement. Initial results pairing sliding SPD with the manufacture’s recommended thermal stress relief cycle demonstrated uniform recrystallization of the microstructure, resulting in a more homogeneous distribution of strain among the microstructure than as-built or post-processed conditions. This result demonstrates the potential for the in situ application of various surface processing techniques during the layerwise direct metal laser sintering build process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Manfredi, F. Calignano, M. Krishnan, R. Canali, E.P. Ambrosio, S. Biamino, D. Ugues, M. Pavese, and P. Fino, Light Metal Alloys Applications, ed. W.A. Monterio (InTech, 2014), pp. 3–34.

  2. M. Krishnan, E. Atzeni, R. Canali, D. Manfredi, F. Calignano, E.P. Ambrosio, and L. Iuliano, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research Virtual Rapid Prototyping, vol, 2009, 2013, pp. 243–248.

  3. E. Brandl, U. Heckenberger, V. Holzinger, and D. Buchbinder, Mater. Des. 34, 159 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Material Datasheet: EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg. https://scrivito-public-cdn.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/eos/public/8837de942d78d3b3/4e099c3a857fdddca4be9d59fbb1cd74/EOS_Aluminium_AlSi10Mg_en.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2015.

  5. T. Sakai, A. Belyakov, R. Kaibyshev, H. Miura, and J.J. Jonas, Prog. Mater. Sci. 60, 130 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L.M. Sochalski-Kolbus, E.A. Payzant, P.A. Cornwell, T.R. Watkins, S.S. Babu, R.R. Dehoff, M. Lorenz, O. Ovchinnikova, and C. Duty, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46A, 2322 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Estrin and A. Vinogradov, Acta Mater 61, 782 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E.O. Hall, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 64, 747 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N.J. Petch, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 8 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Guo (PhD thesis Purdue University, 2012).

  11. A. Mahato, Y. Guo, H. Yeung, and S. Chandrasekar, IOP Conf. Ser., 63, 1.

  12. A. Mahato, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Private Communication, 2015

  13. J.G. Lenard, Primer on Flat Rolling, 1st ed. (Waltham: Elsevier, 2007), p. 17.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. J.L. Devore, Probability and Statisitcs for Engineering and the Sciences, 8th ed. (Boston: Brooks/Cole, 2012), pp. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Gao, Y. Harada, and S. Kumai, Mater. Charact. 107, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Bagheri and M. Guagliano, Surf. Eng. 25, 3 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Oguri, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 1395 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A.H. Cannon, J.D. Hochhalter, A.W. Mello, G.F. Bomarito, and M.D. Sangid, Microsc. Microanal. 0546–000769, 10 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

TAB acknowledges support from this work under the Army Advance Civil Schooling Program. MDS would like to thank partial support from DARPA, N66001-14-1-4041. We thank Prof. Srinivasan Chandrasekar and Dr. Anirban Mahato of the Center for Materials Processing and Tribology at Purdue University for their advice and assistance. Prof. Steven Heister provided the original set of AlSi10Mg samples and Ms. Hannah Woods assisted with initially characterizing the surface roughness and hardness of the test specimens upon receipt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd A. Book.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Book, T.A., Sangid, M.D. Evaluation of Select Surface Processing Techniques for In Situ Application During the Additive Manufacturing Build Process. JOM 68, 1780–1792 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1897-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1897-y

Keywords

Navigation