Skip to main content
Log in

Energy reduction of a submerged membrane bioreactor using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow-fiber membrane

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we modified a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow-fiber membrane element used for submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) to reduce the energy consumption during MBR processes. The high mechanical strength of the PTFE membrane made it possible to increase the effective length of the membrane fiber from 2 to 3 m. In addition, the packing density was increased by 20% by optimizing the membrane element configuration. These modifications improve the efficiency of membrane cleaning associated with aeration. The target of specific energy consumption was less than 0.4 kWh·m–3 in this study. The continuous operation of a pilot MBR treating real municipal wastewater revealed that the MBR utilizing the modified membrane element can be stably operated under a specific air demand per membrane surface area (SADm) of 0.13 m3·m–2·hr–1 when the dailyaveraged membrane fluxes for the constant flow rate and flow rate fluctuating modes of operation were set to 0.6 and 0.5 m3·m–2·d–1, respectively. The specific energy consumption under these operating conditions was estimated to be less than 0.37 kWh·m–3. These results strongly suggest that operating an MBR equipped with the modified membrane element with a specific energy consumption of less than 0.4 kWh·m–3 is highly possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judd S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fenu A, Roels J,Wambecq T, De Gussem K, Thoeye C, De Gueldre G, Van De Steene B. Energy audit of a full scale MBR system. Desalination, 2010, 262(1–3): 121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krzeminski P, van der Graaf J H J M, van Lier J B. Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(2): 380–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barillon B, Martin Ruel S, Langlais C, Lazarova V. Energy efficiency in membrane bioreactors. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 67(12): 2685–2691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buer T, Cumin J. MBR module design and operation. Desalination, 2010, 262(1–3): 1073–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao K, Xu Y, Liang S, Lei T, Sun J, Wen X, Zhang H, Chen C, Huang X. Engineering application of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment in China: Current state and future prospect. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8(6): 805–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krzeminski P, Leverette L, Malamis S, Katsou E. Membrane bioreactors—A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 527: 207–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tao G, Kekre K, Oo M H, Viswanath B, Aliman M D Y, Seah H. Energy reduction and optimisation in membrane bioreactors systems. Water Practice and Technology, 2010, 5(4): 88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Itokawa H, Tsuji K, Yamashita K, Hashimoto T. Design and operating experiences of full-scale municipal membrane bioreactors in Japan. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 69(5): 1088–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoque A, Kimura K, Miyoshi T, Yamato N, Watanabe Y. Characteristics of foulants in air-sparged side-stream tubular membranes used in a municipal wastewater membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 93: 83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gil J A, Túa L, Rueda A, Montaño B, Rodríguez M, Prats D. Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR. Desalination, 2010, 250(3): 997–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Verrecht B, Maere T, Nopens I, Brepols C, Judd S. The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. Water Research, 2010, 44(18): 5274–5283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verrecht B, James C, Germain E, Ma W, Judd S. Experimental evaluation of intermittent aeration of a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63(6): 1217–1223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho J, Smith S, Roh H K. Alternative energy efficient membrane bioreactor using reciprocating submerged membrane. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 70(12): 1998–2003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurita T, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. Energy saving in the operation of submerged MBRs by the insertion of baffles and the introduction of granular materials. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 141(12): 207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monclús H, Dalmau M, Gabarrón S, Ferrero G, Rodríguez-Roda I, Comas J. Full-scale validation of an air scour control system for energy savings in membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 2015, 79 (1): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan X, Wu Q, Sun J, Liang P, Zhang X, Xiao K, Huang X. Hydrodynamic optimization of membrane bioreactor by horizontal geometry modification using computational fluid dynamics. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200: 328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyoshi T, Yamamura H, Morita T,Watanabe Y. Effect of intensive membrane aeration and membrane flux on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors: Reducing specific air demand per permeate (SADp). Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 148(25): 1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Judd S. The status of industrial and municipal effluent treatment with membrane bioreactor technology. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 305(1): 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Japan Sewage Works Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Wastewater. Japan Sewage Works Association, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese)

  21. Cornel P, Wagner M, Krause S. Investigation of oxygen transfer rates in full scale membrane bioreactors. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 47(11): 313–319

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krampe J, Krauth K. Oxygen transfer into activated sludge with high MLSS concentrations. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 47(11): 297–303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Germain E, Nelles F, Drews A, Pearce P, Kraume M, Reid E, Judd S J, Stephenson T. Biomass effects on oxygen transfer in membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 2007, 41(5): 1038–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taro Miyoshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyoshi, T., Nguyen, T.P., Tsumuraya, T. et al. Energy reduction of a submerged membrane bioreactor using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow-fiber membrane. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1018-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1018-y

Keywords

Navigation