Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial neural network-based merging score for Meta search engine

  • Mechanical Engineering, Control Science and Information Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several users use metasearch engines directly or indirectly to access and gather data from more than one data sources. The effectiveness of a metasearch engine is majorly determined by the quality of the results and it returns and in response to user queries. The rank aggregation methods which have been proposed until now exploits very limited set of parameters such as total number of used resources and the rankings they achieved from each individual resource. In this work, we use the neural network to merge the score computation module effectively. Initially, we give a query to different search engines and the top n list from each search engine is chosen for further processing our technique. We then merge the top n list based on unique links and we do some parameter calculations such as title based calculation, snippet based calculation, content based calculation, domain calculation, position calculation and co-occurrence calculation. We give the solutions of the calculations with user given ranking of links to the neural network to train the system. The system then rank and merge the links we obtain from different search engines for the query we give. Experimentation results reports a retrieval effectiveness of about 80%, precision of about 79% for user queries and about 72% for benchmark queries. The proposed technique also includes a response time of about 76 ms for 50 links and 144 ms for 100 links.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SUGIURA A, ETZIONI O. Query routing for Web search engines: architecture and experiments [J]. Computer Networks, 2000, 33(1-6): 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MANNING C D, RAGHAVAN P, SCHUTZE H. Introduction to Information Retrieval [M]. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. MENG W, YU C, LIU K L. Building efficient and effective metasearch engines [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2002, 34(1): 48–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SPINK A, JANSEN B J, BLAKELY C, KOSHMAN S. Overlap among major Web search engines [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), Las Vegas, USA, 2006: 370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MUKHOPADHYAY D, SHARMA M, JOSHI G, PAGARE T, PALWE A. Experience of developing a meta-semantic search engine [C]// International Conference on Cloud and Ubiquitous Computing and Emerging Technologies. Pune, India, 2013: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. VOGT C C. Adaptive combination of evidence for information retrieval [D]. San Diego: University of California at San Diego, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FANG Qi-zhi, XIAO Han, ZHU Shan-feng. Top-d rank aggregation in web meta-search engine [C]// Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Frontiers in algorithmic. 2010: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LI Lin, XU Guan-dong, ZHANG Yan-chun, KITSUREGAWA M. Random walk based rank aggregation to improving web search [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24: 943–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ISHII H, TEMPO R, BAI E W. A web aggregation approach for distributed randomized pagerank algorithms [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(11): 2703–2717.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. COPPERSMITH D, FLEISCHER L, RUDRA A. Ordering by weighted number of wins gives a good ranking for weighted tournaments [J]. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 2010, 6(3): 1–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. SUDEEPTHI G, ANURADHA G, BABU M S P. A survey on semantic web search engine [J]. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 2012, 9(2): 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  12. TAN P N, JIN R. Ordering patterns by combining opinions from multiple sources [C]// Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD). Seattle, USA, 2004: 695–700.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LIU Y T, LIU T Y T, MA Q, LI Z M H. Supervised rank aggregation [C]// Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). Alberta, Canada, 2007: 481–489.

    Google Scholar 

  14. RENDA M E, STRACCIA U. Web metasearch: rank vs score based rank aggregation methods [C]// Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC). 2003: 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ALI R, NAIM I. Neural network based supervised rank aggregation [C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies. Uttar Pradesh, India, 2011: 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SHOKOUHI M. Segmentation of search engine results for effective data-fusion [C]// Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR). Rome, Italy, 2007: 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  17. OZTEKIN B U, KARYPIS G, KUMAR V. Expert agreement and content based reranking in ametasearch environment using Mearf [C]// Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). Honolulu, USA, 2002: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LAMBERTI F, SANNA A, DEMARTINI C. A relation-based page rank algorithm for semantic web search engines [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2009, 21: 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. RASHID A, SUFYAN B M M. Aggregating subjective and objective measures of web search quality using modified shimura technique [J]. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing-Forging New Frontiers: Fuzzy Pioneers II, 2008, 218: 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ENDRULLIS S, THOR A, RAHM E, WETSUIT: An efficient mashup tool for searching and fusing web entities [J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2012, 5(12): 1970–1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. RASHID A, SUFYAN B M M. Automatic performance evaluation of web search systems using rough set based rank aggregation [C]// Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. Allahabad, India, 2009: 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D’AMATO C, FANIZZI N, LAWRYNOWICZ A. Deductive aggregation of semantic web query results [J]. Research and Applications Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010, 6088: 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ARZANIAN B, AKHLAGHIAN F, MORADI P. A multi-agent based personalized meta-search engine using automatic fuzzy concept networks [C]// Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Minning, Washington D C, USA, 2010: 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SANTOS R L T, MACDONALD C, OUNIS I. Mimicking web search engines for expert search [J]. Information Processing and Management, 2011, 47: 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. STEINMETZ N, LAUSEN H. Ontology-based feature aggregation for multi-valued ranking [J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science-Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009 Workshops, 2010, 6275: 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. SKOUTAS D, SACHARIDIS D, SIMITSIS A, SELLIS T. Ranking and clustering web services using multicriteria dominance relationships [J]. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2010, 3(3): 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CERI S, ABID A, HELOU M A, BARBIERI D, BOZZON A, BRAGA D, BRAMBILLA M, CAMPI A, CORCOGLIONITI F, VALLE E D, EYNARD D, FRATERNALI P, GROSSNIKLAUS M, MARTINENGHI D, RONCHI S, TAGLIASACCHI M, VADACCA S. Search computing managing complex search queries [J]. IEEE Internet Computing, 2010, 14(6): 14–22..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. TELANG A, LI C, CHAKRAVARTHY S. One size does not fit all: Toward user-and query-dependent ranking for web databases [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2012, 24(9): 1671–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. AKRITIDIS L, KATSAROS D, BOZANIS P. Effective rank aggregation for metasearching [J]. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2011, 84: 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ISHII H, TEMPO R, BAI E W. A web aggregation approach for distributed randomized pagerank algorithms [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(11): 2703–2717.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. KEYHANIPOUR A H, MOSHIRI B, KAZEMIAN M, PIROOZMAND M, LUCAS C. Aggregation of web search engines based on users' preferences in WebFusion [J]. Journal Knowledge-Based Systems, 2007, 20 (4): 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. AMIN G R, EMROUZNEJAD A. Optimizing search engines results using linear programming [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38: 11534–11537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. LI Lin, XU Guan-dong, ZHANG Yan-chun, MASARU K. Random walk based rank aggregation to improving web search [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24: 943–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. FANG Qi-zhi, XIAO Han, ZHU Shan-feng. Top-d rank aggregation in Web meta-search engine [C]// Proceeding FAW'10 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Frontiers in algorithmics. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  35. LI L, YANG Z, KITSUREGAWA M. Using ontology-based user preferences to aggregate rank lists in web search [C]// Computer Science-Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2008: 923–931.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Vijaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vijaya, P., Raju, G. & Ray, S.K. Artificial neural network-based merging score for Meta search engine. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 2604–2615 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3322-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3322-7

Key words

Navigation