Skip to main content
Log in

Direct AFM measurements of morphology and interaction force at solid-liquid interfaces between DTAC/CTAC and mica

  • Materials, Metallurgy, Chemical and Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adsorption of dedecyltrimethylammoium chloride (DTAC) and hexadecyltrimethylammoium chloride (CTAC) on muscovite mica substrates was examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Adsorption morphology images and interaction forces of cationic surfactants at solid-solution interfaces were measured in tapping mode and PicoForce mode, respectively. The images demonstrated that the adsorbed structure was varied by a variety of surfactant concentrations. The adsorbed layer on mica was monolayer at first, and then became bilayer. A striped adsorbed structure was observed in a higher concentration of CTAC, which could not be found in any other concentrations of DTAC. For force measurements, the repulsive force was exponentially decreasing with the concentration increasing till a net attractive force appeared. A largest attractive force could be observed at a certain concentration, which was close to the point of charge neutralization. The results also showed a significant impact of hydrocarbon chain length on adsorption. An adsorption simulation was established to give a clear understanding of the interaction between cationic surfactants and mica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GAUDIN A M, FUERSTENAU D W. Streaming potential studies—Quartz flotation with cationic collectors [J]. AIME Transactions, 1955, 202: 958–962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LEVITZ P, van DAMME H, KERAVIS D. Fluorescence decay study of the adsorption of nonionic surfactants at the solid-liquid interface. 1. Structure of the adsorption layer on a hydrophilic solid [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1984, 88(11): 2228–2235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LEVITZ P, van DAMME H. Fluorescence decay study of the adsorption of nonionic surfactants at the solid-liquid interface. 2. Influence of polar chain length [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1986, 90(7): 1302–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BINNIG G, QUATE C F, GERBER C. Atomic force microscope [J]. The Physical Review Journals, 1986, 56(9): 930–993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WANG Jia-lin, LI Zuo-li, YOON R H, JAN C E. Surface forces in thin liquid films of n-alcohols and of water-ethanol mixtures confined between hydrophobic surfaces [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 379(1): 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LOKER W J, DUCKER W A. Proximal adsorption of dodecyltrimethy-lammonium bromide to the silica-electrolyte solution interface [J]. Langmuir, 2002, 18(8): 3167–3175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LIU Jian-jun, XU Zheng-he, MASLIYAH J. Studies on bitumen-silica interaction in aqueous solutions by AFM [J]. Langmuir, 2003, 19(9): 3911–3920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LOKAR W J, DUCKER W A. Proximal adsorption at glass surfaces: Ionic strength, pH, chain length effects [J]. Langmuir, 2004, 20(2): 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. GREGORY G W. Surfactant adsorbed layer structure at solid/solution interfaces: impact and implications of AFM imaging studies [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2000, 5(1): 88–94.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. BLOMA A, WARR G G, NELSON A. Structure of mixed DTAB/DDAB adsorbed layers on quartz A neutron reflectometry and atomic force microscopy study [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 310(1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SAINIO T, TURKU I. Adsorption of cationic surfactants on a neutral polymer adsorbent: Investigation of the interactions by using mathematical modeling [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2010, 358 (1): 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. BAKKER M G, MORRIS T A, TURNER G L, GRANGER E. Surfactant aggregates (solids) adsorbed on silica as stationary chromatographic phases: Structures and properties [J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2000, 743(1): 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MANNE S, GAUB H E. Molecular organization of surfactants at solid-liquid interfaces [J]. Science, 1995, 270(5241): 1480–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. SHAH K, CHIU P, SINNOTT S B. Comparison of morphology and mechanical properties of surfactant aggregates at water-silica and water-graphite interfaces from molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 296(1): 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZHAO Feng, DU Yu-kou, XU Jing-kun. Molecular morphology of modified partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (MHPAM) on mica substrates and Langmuir-Blodgett films of MHPAM/CTAB complexes as observed by AFM [J]. European Polymer Journal, 2007, 43(3): 797–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ANNABELLE B, FRANCK P D, LASZLO K, GREGORYG W. Direct visualisation of mesh structures at solid/solution interfaces by AFM [J]. Langmuir, 2004, 20(4): 1291–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van OS N M, HAAK J R, RUPERT L A M. Physico-chemical properties of selected anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants [M] Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LIU Jun-fu, DUCKER W A. Surface-induced phase behavior of alkyltrimethy-lammonium bromide surfactants adsorbed to mica, silica, and graphite [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999, 103: 8558–8567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LOKER W J, DUCKER W A. Proximal adsorption of dodecyltrimethy-lammonium bromide to the silica-electrolyte solution interface [J]. Langmuir, 2002, 18(8): 3167–3175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DUCKER W A, WANLESS E J. Adsorption of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica: Nanometer-scale study of binding-site competition effects [J]. Langmuir, 1999, 15(1): 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. LIU Jun-fu, MIN G, DUCKER W A. AFM study of adsorption of cationic surfactants and cationic polyelectrolytes at the silica-water interface [J]. Langmuir, 2001, 17(16): 4895–4903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. KONG Ling-xin, YANG Bin, LI Yi-fu, XU Bao-qiang, HAN Long, LIU Da-chun, DAI Yong-nian. Application of molecular interaction volume model in separation of Sn-Zn alloy by vacuum distillation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(10): 3372–3378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LIU Jian-jun, XU Zheng-he, MASLIYAH J. Colloidal forces between bitumen surfaces measured with atomic force microscopy in aqueous solutions [J]. Colloid and Surfaces A: Phusicochem, 2005, 260(1/2/3): 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. BUTT H J, CAPPELLA B, KAPPL M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications [J]. Surface Science Reports, 2005, 59(1): 1–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. YOON R H. The role of hydrodynamic and surface forces in bubble-particle interaction [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2000, 58(1): 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. LIU Jian-dong, SUN Wei. Flotation technology and adsorption mechanism of collector CSU-M to molybdenum oxide in Ni-Mo ore [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2014, 45(12): 4105–4110. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISHIDA N. Direct measurement of hydrophobic particle-bubble interactions in aqueous solutions by atomic force microscopy: Effect of particle hydrophobicity [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2007, 300(3): 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. RAMZAN M, AHMED E, NIAZ N A, RANA A M, BHATTI A S, KHALID N R, NADEEM M Y. AFM applications to study the morphology of HfO2 multilayer thin films [J]. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2015, 82: 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. PHILIPP S, THOMAS U, VALTINER M. Direct and quantitative AFM measurements of the concentration and temperature dependence of the hydrophobic force law at nanoscopic contacts [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 446: 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ZHANG Jin-hong, YOON R H, MAO M, DUCKER W A. Effects of degassing and ionic strength on AFM force measurements in octadecyltrimethylammonium chloride solutions [J]. Langmuir, 2005, 21(13): 5831–5841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ZHANG Jin-hong, YOON R H, ERIKSSON J C. AFM surface force measurements conducted with silica in CnTACl solutions: Effect of chain length on hydrophobic force [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 300(3): 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. SCHUBERT H. Nanobubbles, hydrophobic effect, heterocoagulation and hydrodynamics in flotation [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 78(1): 11–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. HERDER P C. Interactions between mica surfaces in dodecyl- and octylammonium chloride solutions [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1990, 134(2): 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. RUTLAND M W, WALTERMO A, CLAESSON P. pH-dependent interactions of mica surfaces in aqueous dodecylamonium/dodecylamine solutions [J]. Langmuir, 1992, 8(1): 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Jiang  (蒋昊).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50974134) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Z., Jiang, H., Sun, Zc. et al. Direct AFM measurements of morphology and interaction force at solid-liquid interfaces between DTAC/CTAC and mica. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 2182–2190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3275-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3275-x

Key words

Navigation