Abstract
Rock physics inversion is to use seismic elastic properties of underground strata for predicting reservoir petrophysical parameters. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is commonly used to solve rock physics inverse problems. However, all the parameters to be inverted are iterated simultaneously in the conventional MCMC algorithm. What is obtained is an optimal solution of combining the petrophysical parameters with being inverted. This study introduces the alternating direction (AD) method into the MCMC algorithm (i.e. the optimized MCMC algorithm) to ensure that each petrophysical parameter can get the optimal solution and improve the convergence of the inversion. Firstly, the Gassmann equations and Xu-White model are used to model shaly sandstone, and the theoretical relationship between seismic elastic properties and reservoir petrophysical parameters is established. Then, in the framework of Bayesian theory, the optimized MCMC algorithm is used to generate a Markov chain to obtain the optimal solution of each physical parameter to be inverted and obtain the maximum posterior density of the physical parameter. The proposed method is applied to actual logging and seismic data and the results show that the method can obtain more accurate porosity, saturation, and clay volume.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., and Mavko, G., 2005, Quantitative seismic interpretation: Cambridge University Press.
Azevedo, L., and Soares A., 2017, Geostatistical methods for reservoir geophysics: Springer International Publishing, 131–132.
Berryman, J. G., 1992, Single-scattering approximations for coefficients in Biot’s equations of poroelasticity: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 551–571.
Bosch, M., Carvajal, C., Rodrigues, J., et al., 2009, Petrophysical seismic inversion conditioned to well-log data: Methods and application to a gas reservoir: Geophysics, 74(2), O1–O15.
de Figueiredo, L. P., Grana, D., Roisenberg, M., et al., 2018, Joint Bayesian inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the estimation of spatially correlated reservoir properties: Geophysics, 83(5): 1SO–Z29.
de Figueiredo, L. P., Grana, D., Roisenberg, M., et al., 2019a, Gaussian mixture Markov chain Monte Carlo method for linear seismic inversion: Geophysics, 84(3): R463–R476.
de Figueiredo, L. P., Grana, D., Roisenberg, M., et al., 2019b, Multimodal Markov chain Monte Carlo method for nonlinear petrophysical seismic inversion: Geophysics, 84(5): M1–M13.
Deng, X. H., Liu, C., Guo, Z. Q., et al., 2019, Rock physics inversion and quantitative seismic interpretation for the longmaxi shale gas reservoir: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 16(3), 652–665.
Dvorkin, J., Nur A., and Yin H., 1994, Effective properties of cemented granular materials: Mechanics of Materials, 18, 351–366.
Gassmann, F., 1951, Über die elastizität poröser medien, Vier der Natur Gesellschaft Zürich, 96, 1–23.
Grana, D., 2016, Bayesian linearized rock-physics inversion: Geophysics, 81(6), D625–D641.
Grana, D., 2018, Joint facies and reservoir properties inversion: Geophysics, 83(3), M15–M24.
Grana, D., de Figueiredo, L. P. D., and Azevedo, L., 2019, Uncertainty quantification in bayesian inverse problems with model and data dimension reduction: Geophysics, 84(6), 1–59.
Grana, D., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., et al., 2012, Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method: Geophysics, 77(4), M53–M72.
Hill, R., 1952, The elastic behavior of crystalline aggregate: Proceedings of the Physical Society, 65, 349–354.
Hong, T. C. and Sen, M. K., 2009, A new MCMC algorithm for seismic wave form inversion and corresponding uncertainty analysis: Geophysical Journal International, 177(1), 14–32.
Jiang, W., Chen, X. H., Zhang, J., et al., 2019, Impedance inversion of pre-stack seismic data in the depth domain: Applied Geophysics, 16(4), 427–437.
Kuster, G. T. and Toksöz, M. N., 1974, Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two media, Part I. Theoretical considerations: Geophysics, 39, 587–606.
Lang, X. and Grana, D., 2018, Bayesian linearized petrophysical avo inversion. Geophysics, 83(3), 5MJ–Z13.
Li, H. B., Zhang, J. J., Pan, H. J., et al., 2021, Nonlinear simultaneous inversion of pore structure and physical parameters based on elastic impedance: Science China Earth Sciences, 64(6), 977–991.
Liu C., Fu W., Guo, Z.Q., et al., 2018, Rock physics inversion for anisotropic shale reservoirs based on Bayesian scheme: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(6), 2589–2600.
Liu, Q., Yin, X. Y., and Li, C., 2015, Fluid discrimination based on rock physics templates: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 12(5), 830–838.
Mattia, A., 2018, Estimating petrophysical reservoir properties through extended elastic impedance inversion: applications to off-shore and on-shore reflection seismic data: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 15(5), 2079–2090.
Mukerji, T., Avseth, P., Mavko, G., et al., 2001, Statistical rock physics: Combining rock physics, information theory, and geostatistics to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization: Leading Edge, 20(3), 313–319.
Raymer, L. L., Hunt, E. R., and Gardner, J. S., 1980, An improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform: SPWLA, 21st Annual Logging Symposium, 21:1–13.
Shi, L., Wang, P., Liu, J., et al., 2020, Physical properties prediction for tight sandstone reservoirs: Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 59(1), 98–107.
Spikes, K., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., et al., 2007, Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models: Geophysics, 72(5), R87–R97.
Tarantola, A., 2005, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation: New York: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1–4.
Wood, A. W., 1955, A Textbook of Sound: New York: The MacMillan Co, 360.
Wu, T. T., 1966, The effect of inclusion shape on the elastic moduli of a two-phase material: International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2, 1–8.
Wyllie, M. R., Gregory, A. R. and Gardner, L. W., 1956, Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media: Geophysics, 21, 41–70.
Xu, S. Y. and White, R. E., 1995, A new velocity model for clay-sand mixtures: Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 91–118.
Xu, S. Y. and White, R. E., 1996, A physical model for shear-wave velocity prediction: Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 687–717.
Yin, X. Y., Zong, Z. Y., and Wu, G. C., 2015, Research on seismic fluid identification driven by rock physics: Science China Earth Sciences, 58(2), 159–171.
Zhang, B., Liu, C., Guo, Z. et al., 2018, Probabilistic reservoir parameters inversion for anisotropic shale using a statistical rock physics model Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(6), 2601–2617.
Zhang, G. Z., Wang, D. Y., Yin, X. Y., et al., 2011, Study on prestack seismic inversion using Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(11), 2926–2932.
Zhao, L. X., Nasser, M. and Han D. H., 2013, Quantitative geophysical pore-type characterization and its geological implication in carbonate reservoirs: Geophysical Prospecting, 61(4), 827–841.
Zhong Y. Y., 2013, Norm optimization via Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers: Dalian University of technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42174146), CNPC major forward-looking basic science and technology projects (No. 2021DJ0204).
Zhang Jiajia graduated from Ocean University of China with a bachelor’s degree in geoscience information in 2007, graduated from Ocean University of China with a master’s degree in earth exploration and information technology in 2010, and graduated from Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, with a doctor’s degree in earth exploration and information technology in 2013. Currently, he is an associate professor at China University of Petroleum (East China). His main research interests are seismic rock physics theory and experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, JJ., Li, HB., Zhang, GZ. et al. Rock physics inversion based on an optimized MCMC method. Appl. Geophys. 18, 288–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-021-0900-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-021-0900-8