Skip to main content
Log in

Economic value evaluation of wetland service in Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Based on multi-source data, this paper evaluated the economic value of ecological services in the Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing, China. The ecological services of wetland included gas regulation, water quality improvement, biodiversity maintenance, erosion control, water supply, recreational opportunity, raw material supply and existence value. Multiple conventional evaluation methods were used to calculate the value of eight wetland services. The results showed that significant values came from biodiversity maintenance and recreational opportunity. The main reasons were as follows. Firstly, Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve was the habitat for migrant birds, and government had payed more efforts to protect precious birds. Secondly, the population is large in Beijing. People enjoyed going outside and enjoyed the natural and artificial wetland scenes. At the same time, most people were prepared to pay for wetland conservation. The decline of vegetation cover made the economic value of erosion control the lowest. While the shrink of water resource and the deteriorative water quality caused the economic value of water supply lower. The evaluation results could help decision-makers understand the present status of the Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve and provide a scientific basis for strategic decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaumont N J, Austen M C, Mangi S C et al., 2008. Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(3): 386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Statistical Bureau, 2008. Beijing Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Hongfang, Zhang Wenbo, Chen Feng, 2008. Advances in researches on application of remote sensing method to estimating vegetation coverage. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, (1): 13–18. (in Chinese)

  • Chen Zhiping, Xiong Hanfeng, Huang Shikuang et al., 2009. The evaluation of the ecosystem services value in Liangzi lake wetland. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(2): 231–233. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland C J, Costanza R, Hall C A S et al., 1984. Energy and the US economy: A biophysical perspective. Science, 225(4665): 890–897. doi: 10.1126/science.225.4665.890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(15): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Lijuan, 2001. Assessment on Wetland Value. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Lijuan, 2002. Assessment on Zhalong wetland value. Journal of Natural Resources, 17(4): 451–456. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber S C, Costanza R, Wilson M A, 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 375–392. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02) 00088-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P D, Abuzar M, Rab M A et al., 2009. Advances in precision agriculture in south-eastern Australia I: A regression methodology to simulate spatial variation in cereal yields using farmers’ historical paddock yields and normalised difference vegetation index. Crop & Pasture Science, 60(9): 844–858. doi:10.1071/CP08347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, 1997. Energy efficiency and competitiveness of biomass based energy systems. Energy, 22(10): 959–967. doi: 10.1016/ S0360-5442(97)00028-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D et al., 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39(3): 333–346. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009 (01)00250-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFeeters S, 1996. The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7): 1425–1432. doi: 10.1080/01431169608948714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moctezuma-Malagon A, Gonzalez-Esquivel C E, De la Lanza-Espino G et al., 2008. A methodology for evaluating the sustainability of inland wetland systems. Aquaculture International, 16(6): 525–537. doi: 10.1007/s10499-007-9163-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T, 1971. Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segui L, Alfranca O, Garcia J, 2009. Techno-economical evaluation of water reuse for wetland restoration: A case study in a natural park in Catalonia, Northeastern Spain. Desalination, 246(1): 179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton P C, Costanza R, 2002. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 509–527. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00097-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras M, 2000. The total economic value of Amazonian deforestation, 1978–1993. Ecological Economics, 33(2): 283–297. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00149-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker C J, Townshend J R G, Golf T E, 1985. African land cover classification using satellite data. Science, 227(4685): 369–375. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4685.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R K, van den Bergh J C J M, Soderqvist T et al., 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 7–23. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00164-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wylie B, Loveland T et al., 2007. Evaluation and comparison of gross primary production estimates for the northern great plains grasslands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106(2): 173–189. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Suzheng, Wang Jindou, Li Guibao, 2006. Evaluation of ecosystem service function of Baiyangdian wetland in Anxin county. Soil and Water Conservation in China, (7): 12–14. (in Chinese)

  • Zhou Bo, Zhu Lin, Zhao Wenji et al., 2010. The evaluation of the value of soil erosion prevention on wetlands in Beijing. The International Society for Optical Engineering, Photonics and Image in Agriculture Engineering (PIAGENG 2010), 7752: 77521Q. doi: 10. 1117/12.887989

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Dachang, Ou Weixin, Ding Dengshan, 2003. Evaluation of the lake recovery area eco-economy benefit in Dongting Lake wetland. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(5): 536–543. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huili Gong.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40771170), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 8082010)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Chen, Y., Gong, H. et al. Economic value evaluation of wetland service in Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 21, 744–752 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0503-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0503-z

Keywords

Navigation