Skip to main content
Log in

Experiences of cancer survivors returning to work decision-making: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Return to work for cancer survivors (CSs) may be challenging, and there is a research gap in integrating the relevant experiences of the return-to-work decision-making process for CSs. Our aim was to synthesize existing qualitative research that integrates the dynamic experiences of CSs in the return-to-work decision-making process and highlights the factors influencing the return-to-work decisions of CSs.

Methods

We retrieved qualitative studies on a relevant theme published in the PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases since construction to December 2023. Literature screening, quality evaluation, and data analysis followed the PRISMA, Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool (2016), and thematic analysis methods to ensure study reliability. The study was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023429623).

Results

Ten articles were included, and six key outcomes were identified based on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) integration: points of concern for individuals, sense of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, work perception and belonging, medical advice and guidance, and effects of the external reactions.

Conclusion

The decision-making process for CSs to return to work is affected by various personal and external factors. Effectively addressing personal appearance, financial, and emotional issues can enhance self-efficacy of CSs. Improving external perceptions of cancer patients and enhancing social support in the workplace and medical settings can help CSs make informed decisions regarding their return to work.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

The decision of CSs to return to work is a result of integrating personal, job, and medical care considerations. These findings contribute to the development of future interventions for CSs’ return-to-work decisions that target an array of potential factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. de Boer AGEM, de Wind A, Coenen P, et al. Cancer survivors and adverse work outcomes: associated factors and supportive interventions. Br Med Bull.  2023;145(1):60–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac028.

  2. Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, Nilsson M, et al. Work situation and sickness absence in the initial period after breast cancer surgery. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, et al. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD007569.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger I, Beck L, Jones J, et al. Exploring the needs of cancer survivors when returning to or staying in the workforce. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(3):480–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu J, Zhou Y, Li J, et al. Cancer patients’ return-to-work adaptation experience and coping resources: a grounded theory study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, et al. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson MA, Fradgley EA, Bridge P, et al. The dynamic relationship between cancer and employment-related financial toxicity: an in-depth qualitative study of 21 Australian cancer survivor experiences and preferences for support. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(4):3093–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou W, Li Q, Liu X, et al. Exploring the employment readiness and return to work status of breast cancer patients and related factors. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;8(4):426–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Blinder VS, Murphy MM, Vahdat LT, et al. Employment after a breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of ethnically diverse urban women. J Community Health. 2012;37(4):763–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, et al. Return to work in European Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(9):2983–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernaes KH, Smeland KB, Fagerli UM, et al. Post-treatment work patterns amongst survivors of lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gragnano A, Miglioretti M, Magon G, et al. Work with cancer or stop working after diagnosis? Variables affecting the decision. Work-a J Prev Assess Rehabil. 2021;70(1):177–85.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribeiro FE, Palma MR, Silva DTC, et al. Relationship of anxiety and depression symptoms with the different domains of physical activity in breast cancer survivors. J Affect Disord. 2020;273:210–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gragnano A, Simbula S, Miglioretti M. Work-Life balance: weighing the importance of work-family and work-health balance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. J Vocat Behav. 1994;45(1):79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019;17(1):36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, et al. A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2005;14(11):992–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, et al. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007;16(1):17–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stergiou-Kita M, Pritlove C, Holness DL, et al. Am I ready to return to work? Assisting cancer survivors to determine work readiness. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(4):699–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanberg JE, Nichols HM, Ko J, et al. Managing cancer and employment: decisions and strategies used by breast cancer survivors employed in low-wage jobs. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017;35(2):180–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dewa CS, Trojanowski L, Tamminga SJ, et al. Work-related experiences of head and neck cancer survivors: an exploratory and descriptive qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(11):1252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Şengüninan F, Günüşen N, Özkul B, et al. A dimension in recovery: return to working life after breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2020;43(6):E328–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bae KR, Cho J. Changes after cancer diagnosis and return to work: experience of Korean cancer patients [J]. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Maheu C, Parkinson M, Wong C, et al. Self-employed Canadians’ experiences with cancer and work: a qualitative study. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(5):4586–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu WH, Fox J, Yates P. Work-related experiences of prostate cancer survivors in Australia: a qualitative study [J]. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Barnard A, Clur L, Joubert Y. Returning to work: the cancer survivor’s transformational journey of adjustment and coping. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016;11:32488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stepanikova I, Powroznik K, Cook KS, et al. Exploring long-term cancer survivors’ experiences in the career and financial domains: interviews with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016;34(1–2):2–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Parsons JA, Eakin JM, Bell RS, et al. “So, are you back to work yet?” Re-conceptualizing ‘work’ and ‘return to work’ in the context of primary bone cancer [J]. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1826–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tran TB, Malhotra G, Razavi M, et al. Emotional distress and financial toxicity in younger adult patients undergoing oncologic surgery. Ann Surg. 2022;276(4):694–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Silvaggi F, Mariniello A, Leonardi M, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with workability after surgery in cancer survivors: an explorative study. J Health Psychol. 2023;28(11):999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231151286.

  33. Snippen NC, de Vries HJ, Van der Burg-Vermeulen SJ, et al. Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao JY, Que WQ, Tang J, et al. Colorectal cancer survivors’ experiences of return-to-work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023;63:102284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sarfo MC, Bertels L, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. The role of general practitioners in the work guidance of cancer patients: views of general practitioners and occupational physicians. J Cancer Surviv. 2023;17(2):416–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yagil D, Goldblatt H, Cohen M. Family members’ experiences of the return to work of cancer survivors. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(1):184–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Henney CR, Chrissafis I, McFarlane J, et al. A method of estimating nursing workload. J Adv Nurs. 1982;7(4):319–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yarker J, Munir F, Bains M, et al. The role of communication and support in return to work following cancer-related absence. Psychooncology. 2010;19(10):1078–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shim HY, Lee CW, Yu ES, et al. Cancer survivors and returning to work perspectives from occupational health physicians in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(11):e98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Nantong University for supporting this research.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant numbers [21BSH007]).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Title and abstracts were screened by two researchers (B-xK, PX). X-qS and H-hS screened all full-text studies along with all excluded papers and data was extracted. The quality appraisal was carried out by X-qS and B-xK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by X-qS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Xue or Yu-jie Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is a meta-synthesis and no ethical approval is required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Xq., Sang, Hh., Kuai, Bx. et al. Experiences of cancer survivors returning to work decision-making: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01530-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01530-x

Keywords

Navigation