Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach

  • Conceptual/Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to service-dominant logic (S-D logic), all providers are service providers, and service is the fundamental basis of exchange. Value is co-created with customers and assessed on the basis of value-in-context. However, the extensive literature on S-D logic could benefit from paying explicit attention to the fact that both service exchange and value co-creation are influenced by social forces. The aim of this study is to expand understanding of service exchange and value co-creation by complementing these central aspects of S-D logic with key concepts from social construction theories (social structures, social systems, roles, positions, interactions, and reproduction of social structures). The study develops and describes a new framework for understanding how the concepts of service exchange and value co-creation are affected by recognizing that they are embedded in social systems. The study contends that value should be understood as value-in-social-context and that value is a social construction. Value co-creation is shaped by social forces, is reproduced in social structures, and can be asymmetric for the actors involved. Service exchanges are dynamic, and actors learn and change their roles within dynamic service systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M. (1994). Critical theory and consumer marketing. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 10(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P., Aspenberg, K., & Kjellberg, H. (2008). The configuration of actors in market practice. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneria, L. (1979). Reproduction, production and the sexual division of labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois, K. (2003). B2B 'relationships'—a social construction of reality? Marketing Theory, 3(1), 79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R. (1985). Phenomenology: A Preferred Approach to Research in Information Systems. In E. Mumford et al. (Eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems (pp. 193–201). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeale, M. (2009). Word of mouse. International Journal of Market Research, 51(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. (1997). Social Construction Theory and the Satir Model: Towards a Synthesis. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(4), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colton, C. W. (1987). Leisure, Recreation, Tourism: A Symbolic Interactionism View. Annals of Tourism Research, 14(3), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J., & Grayson, K. (1995). Marketing and Seduction: Building Exchange Relationships by Managing Social Consensus. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 660–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edholm, F., Harris, O., & Young, K. (1977). Conceptualising women. Critique of Anthropology, 3(9/10), 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1990). Symbolic Interaction in the Post-Blumerian Age. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis (pp. 117–157). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, D. J. (2006). Innovation, symbolic interaction and customer valuing: thoughts stemming from a service-dominant logic of marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., & Davis, K. E. (1985). The Social construction of the person. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1988). Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, A., & Pushkala, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus From Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 509–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1994). Quo Vadis, Marketing? Toward a Relationship Marketing Paradigm. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(5), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackley, C. E. (2007). Marketing and social construction: exploring the rhetorics of managed consumption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O., & Young, K. (1981). Engendered structures: some problems in the analysis of reproduction. In J. Kahn & J. Llobera (Eds.), The Anthropology of Pre-Capitalist Societies. London: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing Realities: An Art of Lenses. Family Process, 29(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (1995). How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Rizzo, J. R. (1972). Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7, 467–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A. (2000). Social Psychology of Identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 367–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (2000). A general theory of competition: resources, competences, productivity, economic growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Derozier, C. (2004). The normative imperatives of business and marketing strategy: grounding strategy in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (1994). Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In J. G. Anderson, C. E. Aydin, & S. J. Jay (Eds.), Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications (pp. 45–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2007). On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & Levin, W. C. (1988). The human puzzle: an introduction to social psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, R. (1936). The study of man: an introduction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M. (1998). Fertility and household labour in Tanzania: demography, economy, and society in Rufiji District. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Malter, A. J. (2006). Marketing as Service-Exchange: Taking a Leadership Role in Global Marketing Management. Organizational Dynamics, 35(3), 264–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Wessels, G. (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, M. A., He, Y., & Vargo, S. L. (2009). The Evolving Brand Logic: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S. (2008). Customer Integration—A Key to an Implementation Perspective of Service Provision. Journal of Service Research, 11, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. (1984). Service management: strategy and leadership in service business. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The Role of Television in the Construction of Consumer Reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A., & Ponsonby, S. (2002). The Social Construction of New Marketing Paradigms: The Influence of Personal Perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(1/2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pels, J., Möller, K., & Saren, M. (2009). Do we really understand business marketing? Getting beyond the RM and BM matrimony. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peñaloza, L., & Venkatesh, A. (2006). Further evolving the new dominant logic of marketing: from services to the social construction of markets. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. (1993). Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist Study of Work Computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1400–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., & Forde, D. (1950). African systems of kinship and marriage. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (1994). Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheff Bernstein, J. (2007). Arts marketing insights: the dynamics of building and retaining performing arts audiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, C. (1996). Cultural and Social Structural Explanations of Cross-National Psychological Differences. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., & Goolsby, J. R. (1995). Employee burnout and its implications for customer service representatives. Stores Magazine, 77(4), RR8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems. IEEE Computer, 40(1), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1967). Symbolic Interaction as an Approach to Family Research. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronvoll, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2008). Paradigms in Service Research: A Framework and Analysis of the Discouse. 17th Annual Frontiers in Service Conference, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer Integration and Value Creation: Paradigmatic Traps and Perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2009a). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2009b). Alternative Logics for Service Science and Service Systems. Service Systems Workshop: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-Dominant Logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008b). Why “service”? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008c). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Decentralization of IS in developing countries: power to the people? Journal of Information Technology, 8(2), 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, M., de Ruyter, K., & Lemmink, J. (1999). Role Stress in After-Sales Service Management. Journal of Service Research, 2(1), 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 316–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CTF-Research Center, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 1, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden

    Bo Edvardsson

  2. Hedmark University College, 2418, Elverum, Norway

    Bård Tronvoll

  3. The University of Manchester, Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK

    Thorsten Gruber

Authors
  1. Bo Edvardsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bård Tronvoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thorsten Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bård Tronvoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B. & Gruber, T. Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 39, 327–339 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y

Keywords