Abstract
The present study aimed to determine phospholipase C (PLC) activation status during changes promoted by Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 in wheat seedlings. Germinated Triticum aestivum seeds by 3 days were inoculated with different A. brasilense concentrations (1 × 106 and 4 × 106 CFU/mL) and PLC enzyme activity assayed at different times. Root and leaf length, as well as total fresh weight were assessed as growth parameters; moreover, changes in root morphology were analyzed. PLC activity was measured by molybdate assay. Neomycin and LaCI3 treatments verified PLC- and/or Ca2+-dependent effects on inoculated wheat, respectively. A. brasilense increased PLC activity 15–30 min after inoculation. Ca2+-channel blocker LaCI3 decreased PLC activity, and activity did not recover with A. brasilense. The A. brasilense mutant FAJ009, impaired in auxin production, showed decreased PLC activity versus wild type. PLC activity was inhibited by neomycin (PLC inhibitor), concomitant with a decrease in total fresh weight. Exogenous addition of diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), secondary messengers produced by the activity of PLC, increased root hair length. The putative role of PLC enzyme activity in morphological changes promoted by A. brasilense in wheat seedlings is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreeva Z, Barton D, Armour WJ, Li MY, Liao LF, McKellar HL, Pethybridge KA, Marc J (2010) Inhibition of phospholipase C disrupts cytoskeletal organization and gravitropic growth in Arabidopsis roots. Plant 232:1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1256-0
Baldani VLD, de Alvarez MA MAB, Baldani JI, Dobereiner JD (1986) Establishment of inoculated Azospirillum spp. in the rhizosphere and in roots of field grown wheat and sorghum. Plant Soil 90:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277385
Bashan Y, de-Bashan L (2010) How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum promotes plant growth. A critical assessment. Adv Agron 108:77–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08002-8
Bashan Y, Holguin G, de-Bashan LE (2004) Azospirillum–plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997–2003). Can J Microbiol 50:521–577. https://doi.org/10.1139/w04-035
Berridge MJ (1993) Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signaling. Nature 361:315–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/361315a0
Canonne J, Froidure-Nicolas S, Rivas S (2011) Phospholipases in action during plant defense signaling. Plant Signal Behav 6:13–18. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.1.14037
Cassan F, Diaz-Zorita M (2016) Azospirillum sp. in current agriculture: from the laboratory to the field. Soil Biol Biochem 103:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.020
Chapman KD (1998) Phospholipase activity during plant growth and development and in response to environmental stress. Trends Plant Sci 3:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01326-0
Chen G, Snyder CL, Greer MS, Weselake RJ (2011) Biology and biochemistry of plant phospholipases. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.572033
Dowd PE, Coursol S, Skirpan AL, Kao TH, Gilroy S (2006) Petunia phospholipase c1 is involved in pollen tube growth. Plant Cell 18:1438–1453. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.041582
Durban MA, Bornscheuer UT (2007) An improved assay for the determination of phospholipase C activity. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 109:469–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200700027
Gabev E, Kasianowicz J, Abbott T, McLaughlin S (1989) Binding of neomycin to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP 2). Biochim Biophys Acta 979:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(89)90529-4
Hirayama T, Ohto C, Mizoguchi T, Shinozaki K (1995) A gene encoding a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C is induced by dehydration and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3903–3907
Hong Y, Zhao J, Guo L, Kim S-C, Deng X, Wang G, Zhang G, Li M, Wang X (2016) Plant phospholipases D and C and their diverse functions in stress responses. Prog Lipid Res 62:55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2016.01.002
Kanehara K, Yu C-Y, Cho Y, Cheong W-F, Torta F, Shui G, Wenk MR, Nakamura Y (2015) Arabidopsis AtPLC2 is a primary phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C in phosphoinositide metabolism and the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. PLoS Genet 11:e1005511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005511
Khodakovskaya M, Sword C, Wu Q, Perera IY, Boss WF, Brown CS, Sederoff HW (2010) Increasing inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate metabolism affects drought tolerance, carbohydrate metabolism and phosphate-sensitive biomass increases in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J 8:170–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00472.x
Komis G, Galatis B, Quader H, Galanopoulou D, Apostolakos P (2008) Phospholipase C signaling involvement in macrotubule assembly and activation of the mechanism regulating protoplast volume in plasmolyzed root cells of Triticum turgidum. New Phytol 178:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02363.x
Mariani ME, Madoery RR, Fidelio GD (2015) Auxins action on Glycine max secretory phospholipase A2 is mediated by the interfacial properties imposed by the phytohormones. Chem Phys Lipids 189:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.05.003
Ohanian J, Ohanian V (2001) Lipid second messenger regulation: the role of diacylglycerol kinases and their relevance to hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 15:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001139
Pereyra CM, Ramella NA, Pereyra MA, Barassi CA, Creus CM (2010) Changes in cucumber hypocotyl cell wall dynamics caused by Azospirillum brasilense inoculation. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.001
Peters C, Kim S-C, Devaiah S, Li M, Wang X (2014) Non-specific phospholipase C5 and diacylglycerol promote lateral root development under mild salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 37:2002–2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12334
Pokotylo I, Pejchar P, Potocky M, Kocourkova D, Krckova Z, Ruelland E, Kravets V, Martinec J (2013) The plant non-specific phospholipase C gene family. Novel competitors in lipid signaling. Prog Lipid Res 52:62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2012.09.001
Pokotylo I, Kolesnikov Y, Kravets V, Zachowski A, Ruelland E (2014) Plant phosphoinositide-dependent phospholipases C: variations around a canonical theme. Biochimie 96:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2013.07.004
Profotová B, Burketová L, Novotná Z, Martinec J, Valentová O (2006) Involvement of phospholipases C and D in early response to SAR and ISR inducers in Brassica napus plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.02.003
Scherer GFE (1995) Activation of phospholipase A2 by auxin and mastoparan in hypocotyl segments from zucchini and sunflower. J Plant Physiol 145:483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81775-X
Singh A, Kanwar P, Pandey A, Tyagi AK, Sopory SK, Kapoor S, Pandey GK (2013) Comprehensive genomic analysis and expression profiling of phospholipase C gene family during abiotic stresses and development in rice. PLoS One 8:e62494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062494
Spaepen S, Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Vanderleyden J (2008) Effects of Azospirillum brasilense indole-3-acetic acid production on inoculated wheat plants. Plant Soil 312:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9560-1
Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J (2000) Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:487–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00552.x
Tsukagoshi H (2012) Defective root growth triggered by oxidative stress is controlled through the expression of cell cycle-related genes. Plant Sci 197:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.08.011
Tuteja N, Sopory SK (2008) Plant signaling in stress: G-protein coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins and signal coupling via phospholipases. Plant Signal Behav 3:79–86
Vande Broek A, Lambrecht M, Eggermont K, Vanderleyden J (1999) Auxins upregulate expression of the indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase gene in Azospirillum brasilense. J Bacteriol 181:1338–1342
Vermeer JEM, van Wijk R, Goedhart G, Geldner N, Chory J, Gadella TWJ Jr, Munnik T (2017) In vivo imaging of diacylglycerol at the cytoplasmic leaflet of plant membranes. Plant Cell Physiol 58:1196–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcx012
Vossen JH, Abd-El-Haliem A, Fradin EF, Van Den Berg G, Ekengren SK, Meijer HJG, Seifi A, Bai Y, Ten Have A, Munnik T, Thomma BPHJ, Joosten MHAJ (2010) Identification of tomato phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C (PI-PLC) family members and the role of PLC4 and PLC6 in HR and disease resistance. Plant J 62:224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04136.x
Wang X (2001) Plant phospholipases. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:211–231. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.211
Wang X (2004) Lipid signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.012
Wimalasekera R, Pejchar P, Holk A, Martinec J, Scherer GF (2010) Plant phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing phospholipases C NPC3 and NPC4 with roles in root development and brassinolide signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 3:610–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq005
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Gladys Alexandre (Tennessee University) for revising and rewriting the manuscript. This study was supported by the Coordinación de la Investigación Científica, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, México.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
Additional information
Communicated by M. H. Walter.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro-Mercado, E., García-Pineda, E. Phospholipase C activity is increased in wheat seedlings inoculated with the rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense Sp245. Acta Physiol Plant 41, 152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2949-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2949-z