Skip to main content
Log in

GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flow is a rapid flow which could lead to severe flooding with catastrophic consequences such as damage to properties and loss of human lives. It is important to study the movement of debris flow. Since during a debris flow process, the erosion and deposition processes are important, the no entrainment assumption is not acceptable. In this study, first we considered the debris flow as equivalent fluid and adopted the depth-averaged govern equations to simulate the movements and evolution of river bed. Secondly, the set of partial differential equations was solved numerically by means of explicit staggered leap-frog scheme that is accurate in space and time. The grid of difference scheme was derived from GIS raster data. Then the simulation results can be displayed by GIS and easily used to form the hazard maps. Finally, the numerical model coupled with GIS is applied to simulate the debris flow occurred on Oct. 20th, 2010, in Amamioshima City, Japan. The simulation reproduces the movement, erosion and deposition. The results are shown to be consistent with the field investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang C, Rengers N, Yang Y H, Wang G F. Triggering conditions and depositional characteristics of a disastrous debris flow event in Zhouqu city, Gansu Province, northwestern China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 11(11): 2903–2912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roy C S, Masahiro C. Landslides and debris flows strike Kyushu, Japan. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 2004, 85: 145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armanini A, Fraccarollo L, Rosatti G. Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels. Computers & Geosciences, 2009, 35: 993–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hungr O. A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1995, 32: 610–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hungr O, Evans S G. A dynamic model for landslides with changing mass. In: Marinos, Koukis, Tsiambaos and Stournaras, eds. Engineering Geology and the Environment. Athens, Greece, 1997, 719–724

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rickenmann D, Koch T. Comparison of debris flow modelling approaches. In: Chen C L, ed. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Proceedings of the first International DFHM Conference. ASCE, New York, USA, 1997, 576–585

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coussot P. Some considerations on debris flow rheology. In: Ergenzinger P, Schmidt K H, eds. Dynamics and Geomorphology of Mountain Rivers, Dynamics and Geomorphology of Mountain Rivers. Lectures Notes in Earth Sciences 52, Berlin, 1994, 315–326

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Whipple K X. Open channel flow of Bingham Fluids: Applications on debris flow research. Journal of Geology, 1997, 105: 243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brufau P, Garcia-Navarro P, Ghilardi P, Natale L, Savi F. 1D mathematical modelling of debris flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2000, 38: 435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakagawa H, Takahashi T. Estimation of a debris flow hydrograph and hazard area. In: Chen C L, eds. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Proceedings of the first International DFHM Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997, 64–73

  11. Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Satofuka Y. A debris-flow disaster on the fan of the Harihara River, Japan. In:Wieczorek G F, Naeser N D, eds. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Proceedings of Second International DFHM Conference. Taipei, China, 2000, 193–201

  12. Shieh C L, Jan C D, Tsai Y F. A numerical simulation of debris flow and its applications. Natural Hazards, 1996, 13: 39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi T. Debris Flow, IAHR Monograph Series. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Harada T, Yamashiki Y. Routing debris flows with particle segregation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1992, 118(11): 1490–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zanre D D L, Needham D J. On simple waves and weak shock theory for the equations of alluvial river hydraulics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1996, 354: 2993–3054

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai C. Modelling alluvial channel flow by multimode characteristic method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1991, 117: 32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris P H, Williams D J. Relative celerities of mobile bed flows with finite solid concentration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1996, 122: 311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iverson R M. The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics, 1997, 35: 245–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McDougall S, Hungr O. Dynamic modeling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42: 1437–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen H, Crosta G B, Lee C F. Erosional effects on runout of fast landslides debris flows and avalanches: A numerical investigation. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(5): 305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Remaitre A. Mophologie et dynamique des laves torrentielles: Applications aux torrents des Terres Noires du basin de Barcelonnette (Alpes du Sud). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Caen: Université de Caen, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vandine D F, Bovis M. History and goals of Canadian debris flow research, a review. Natural Hazards, 2002, 26: 69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sovilla B, Margreth S, Bartelt P. On snow entrainment in avalanches dynamics calculations. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2007, 47: 69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mangeney A, Roche O, Hungr O, Mangold N, Faccanoni G, Lucas A. Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115: 20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin M L, Jeng S S. A preliminary study of risk assessment of debris flow using GIS. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 1995, 7: 475–486 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lin J Y, Yang M D, Lin P S. An evaluation on the applications of remote sensing and GIS in the estimation system on potential debris flow. Annual Conference of Chinese Geographic Information Society (CD edition), 1998

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin P S, Lin J Y, Hung J C, Yang M D. Risk assessment of potential debris flows using GIS. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Debris-Flow. Balkema, 2000, 431–440

  28. Cheng K Y, Lin L K, Chang S Y. The field investigation and GIS application in a potential hazardous area of debris flow. In: Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings of the First International Conference. ASCE, New York. 1997, 83–92

  29. Imran J, Harff P, Parker G. A number model of submarine debris-flow with a graphical user interface. Computers & Geosciences, 2001, 27: 717–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Iverson R M. The debris-flow rheology myth. In: Rickenmann D, Chen C L, eds. Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003, 303–314

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vreugdenhil C B. Numerical Methods for Shallow-Water Flow. Norwell: Kluwer Acadamic, 1994

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Savage S B, Hutter K. The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 199: 177–215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Gray J M N T, Wieland M, Hutter K. Gravity-driven free surface flow of granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1999, 455: 1841–1874

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Naef D, Rickenmann D, Rutschmann P, McArdell B W. Comparision of flow resistance relations for debris flows using a one-dimensional finite element simulation model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2006, 6: 155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Christen M, Kowalski J, Bartelt P. RAMMS: Numerical simulation of snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2010, 63: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshiaki I, Akihide T. Numerical simulations of flows and dispersive behaviours in southern part of lake Biwa. Disaster Prevention Research Institute Annuals, 1978, 31(B-2): 293–305 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J., Chen, G., Zheng, L. et al. GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 7, 206–214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0198-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0198-6

Keywords

Navigation