Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between two commercial uranium resins and a uranyl sulphate imprinted resin based on self-assembling MIT

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, resins prepared via molecular imprinting technology have received considerable attention owing to their recognition and selective adsorption. This paper deals with the comparative investigation between a uranyl sulphate imprinted ion-exchange based on self-assembling molecular imprinting technology and two kinds of commercial uranium resins (the medium pore resin D263 and strong base resin 201 × 7). The studies were focused on their kinetics performance, adaptability toward pH, and performance of saturation and elution in laboratory-scale column. The results show that the imprinted ion exchange resin has the fast kinetics, high adaptability toward pH, and good adsorption and elution performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vlatakis G, Andersson L I, Muller R, Mosbach K. Drug assay using antibody mimics made by molecular imprinting. Nature, 1993, 361: 645–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wulff G, Sarhan A. Enzyme-analogue built polymers and their use for the resolution of racemates. Tetrahedron Lett, 1973, 44: 4,329–4,332

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi V P, Karode S K, Kulkarmi M G, Mashelkar R A. Novel separation strategies based on molecularly imprinted adsorbents. Chem Eng Sci, 1999, 53: 2,271–2,284

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi V P, Kulkarni M G, Mashelkar R A. Enhancing adsorptive separations by molecularly imprinted polymers: Role of imprinting techniques and system parameters. Chem Eng Sci, 2000, 55: 1,509–1,522

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martha S V, David A S. Molecular imprinting made easy. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126: 7,827–7,833

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matsui J, Nichills I A, Karube I, Mosbach K. Carbon-carbon bond formation using substrate selective catalytic polymers prepared by molecular imprinting: An artificial class II aldolase. J Org Chem, 1996, 61: 5,414–5,417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickert F L, Besnbook H, Tortschanoff M. Molecular imprinting through van der waals interactions: Fluorescence detection of PAHs in water. Adv Mater, 1998, 10: 149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H, Kaczmarski K, Guiochon G. Intraparticle mass transfer kinetics on molecularly imprinted polymers of structural analogues of a template. Chem Eng Sci, 2006, 61: 1,127–1,137

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fujiwara I, Maeda M, Takagi M. Preparation of ferrocyanide-imprinted pyridine-carrying microspheres by surface imprinting polymerization. Anal Sci, 2003, 19: 617–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui A H, Amarjit S, David L K. Enzyme-based molecular imprinting with metals. Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3: 1,353–1,358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo B H, Kim Y K, Jardine P M. Sorption and binary exchange of nitrate, sulfate, and uranium on an anion-exchange resin. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38: 3,184–3,188

    Google Scholar 

  12. Song Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Song C, Yang Z, Zhao A. Recovery of uranium from carbonate solutions using strongly basic anion exchanger (4): Column operation and quantitative analysis. React Funct Polym, 1999, 39: 245–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Unsworth E R, Cook J M, Hill S J. Determination of uranium and thorium in natural waters with a high matrix concentration using solid-phase extraction inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta, 2001, 442: 141–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aly H M. Chromatographic studies on the uptake of cobalt and uranium from nitrate solution on Al-13-phosphatoantimonic. Sep Purif Technol, 2001, 24: 413–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barton C S, Stewart D I, Morris K, Bryant D E. Performance of three resin-based materials for treating uranium-contaminated groundwater within a PRB. J Hazard Mater, 2004, B116: 191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y C, Zhang X W, Liu H J, Xu W J. Study on synthesis of uranyl sulphate imprinted ion exchange resin and its recognition characteristics. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2006, 20: 510–514 (in Chinese)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Yaochi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Xu, W., Xu, W. et al. Comparison between two commercial uranium resins and a uranyl sulphate imprinted resin based on self-assembling MIT. Front. Chem. Eng. China 1, 327–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-007-0059-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-007-0059-8

Keywords

Navigation