Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Clinical Success Through Intensive Dietary Support in Bariatric Patients: a Retrospective Study in Asian Population

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Weight loss surgery is an established intervention for obesity and related conditions, ensuring sustained weight reduction and improved comorbidities. Post-bariatric surgery, maintaining nutritional adequacy and weight loss necessitates ongoing, intensive dietary support. This research aims to discern the impact of standard care vs. intensive dietary support on outcomes following bariatric surgery within an Asian demographic. This study aims to research the part that intensive dietary support plays in contrast to standard care in altering weight loss and BMI change following bariatric surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of medical records from a Malaysian tertiary care hospital documented bariatric surgeries conducted from January 2020 to January 2022. Rigorous criteria selected 200 patients from 327, evenly split between standard care and intensive dietary support groups. The latter underwent six mandatory visits with a surgeon and a dietitian in the initial 3 months post-surgery. A dual-review mechanism was implemented for data interpretation, increasing robustness, and reducing biases in our findings.

Results

At 6 and 12 months, the intensive dietary support group exhibited significantly greater weight loss and BMI reduction (p < 0.01). Postoperative complications did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion

In an Asian population, intensive dietary support enhances weight loss and BMI reduction compared to standard care after bariatric surgery.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared to protect patients’ confidentiality.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight [Internet]. WHO; 2021 June [cited 2023 Jul 03]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

  2. Helble M, Francisco K (2017) The upcoming obesity crisis in Asia and the pacific: first cost estimates. ADBI Working Paper 743. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/imminent-obesity-crisis-asia-and-pacific-firstcost-estimates

  3. Taylor VH, Forhan M, Vigod SN, et al. The impact of obesity on quality of life. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(2):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A,  et al. Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during 10 years. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(13):1581–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2015;131(4):e29–39. Available from: http://my.americanheart.org/statements

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. Erratum in: Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(12):1345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gloy V, Briel M, Bhatt D, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. McGrice M, Don PK. Interventions to improve long-term weight loss in patients following bariatric surgery: challenges and solutions. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015;8:263–74. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S57054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, et al. Long-term weight regains after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008;18(6):648–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Athanasiadis DI, Martin A, Kapsampelis P, et al. Factors associated with weight regain post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(8):4069–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08329-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farias G, Thieme RD, Teixeira LM, et al. Good weight loss responders and poor weight loss responders after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: clinical and nutritional profiles. Nutr Hosp. 2016;33:574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauti M, Kularatna M, Pillai A, et al. A randomised trial of text message support for reducing weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy. Obesity surg. 2018;28(8):2178–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3176-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson A, Husband AK, Slight RD, et al. Digital technology to support lifestyle and health behaviour changes in surgical patients: systematic review. BJS Open. 2020;5(2) https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa009.

  15. Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14:514–9. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089204323013523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McVay MA, Friedman KE, Applegate KL, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(6):956–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Switzer NJ, Shaheed M, Daniel S, et al. Quality of follow-up: systematic review of the research in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):875–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim H-S, Kim YJ, Lee J, et al. Establishment of adequate nutrient intake criteria to achieve target weight loss in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Nutrients [Internet]. 2020;12(6):1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nutrition Department. Malaysian food composition database (MyFCD)[Internet]. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Health; 2015 [cited 2023 October 16]. Available from: https://myfcd.moh.gov.my/

  20. FOCOS. Energy and nutrient composition of food [Internet]. Singapore: Health Promotion Board; 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 16]. Available from: https://focos.hpb.gov.sg/eservices/ENCF/

  21. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Celio A, et al. Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery: effect on weight loss. Obes Surg. 2016;26:900–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2059-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HJ, Madan A, Fenton-Lee D. Does patient compliance with follow-up influence weight loss after gastric bypass surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2014;24:647–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1178-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, et al. Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008;18:648–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarwer DB, Heinberg LJ. A review of the psychosocial aspects of clinically severe obesity and bariatric surgery. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):252–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Voglino C, Badalucco S, Tirone A, et al. Follow-up after bariatric surgery: is it time to tailor it? Analysis of early predictive factors of 3-year weight loss predictors of unsuccess in bariatric patients. Updates Surg. 2022;74(4):1389–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01314-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiavo L, Pilone V, Rossetti G, et al. The role of the nutritionist in a multidisciplinary bariatric surgery team. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1028–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03706-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures—2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:175–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Swenson BR, Saalwachter Schulman A, Edwards MJ, et al. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet on post laparoscopic gastric bypass weight loss: a prospective randomized trial. J Surg Res. 2007;142(2):308–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Connor S. Underreporting of dietary intake: key issues for weight management clinicians. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2020;14:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-020-00652-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvina Xin Jie Sim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Clinical success encompasses weight loss, complications, and dietary adherence.

• Follow-up frequency is a crucial determinant of success.

• Intensive dietary support provides sustained assistance and education for superior weight loss outcomes.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, A.X.J., Tsen, P.Y., Ngali, N.M. et al. Enhancing Clinical Success Through Intensive Dietary Support in Bariatric Patients: a Retrospective Study in Asian Population. OBES SURG 34, 509–514 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-07001-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-07001-7

Keywords

Navigation