Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Trainee Involvement on Outcomes in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The number of bariatric operations performed in the USA rises annually. Trainee exposure to this field is necessary to ensure competency in future surgical generations. However, the safety of trainee involvement of these operations has been called into question.

Objectives

The aim of our study is to describe differences in outcomes between trainees and non-trainees as first assistants (FA) in sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Setting

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database

Methods

Patients from the MBSAQIP database who underwent primary SG from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Statistical analysis included two-tailed t-tests and χ2-tests to evaluate the impact of trainees (residents and fellows) compared to non-trainees on post-operative morbidity and operative time.

Results

Of the 559,324 cases, 25.8% were performed with trainees as FA. Operative length was 27.9% longer in trainee cases. In the trainee group, there was a higher risk of conversion to open procedure (OR 1.32), readmission (OR 1.19), and specific complications (cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, progressive renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, transfusion, intubation, UTI, VTE, ICU admission, and reintervention), though overall rates were < 1% in each group. Non-trainees had a higher rate of septic shock (OR 1.4). No significant difference was seen in all other perioperative outcomes.

Conclusion

Trainee involvement in SG leads to longer operative times without a clinically significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Such findings should be used to counsel patients and shape expectations for surgeons and hospitals. A focused bariatric surgery trainee curriculum may lessen this gap.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2020. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed 27 June 2022.

  2. Mahan P, Fluck DM, Gabrielsen M, et al. First assistant impact on early morbidity and mortality in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(9):1541–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards T, H., & Spaulding, A. Resident first assistance in bariatric surgery: do patients pay a price? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(6):738–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg Y, Park J, Pryor J, et al. Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(9):3014–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuce H, Soper A, Nagle NJ, et al. Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(8):1948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuckelman J, DO B, Jason MD, et al. Advanced Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery is Safe in General Surgery Training. Am J Surg. 2017;213(5):963–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonner KM, Mustafa SM, Abbas RR, et al. The educating enigma: Does training level impact postoperative outcome in bariatric surgery? Surgery. 2018;164(4):784–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haskins K, Hayes J, Amdur K, et al. The effect of resident involvement on bariatric surgical outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Surg Res. 2018;223:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Major P, Wysocki M, Dworak J, et al. Are bariatric operations performed by residents safe and efficient? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):614–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, et al. Surgical Resident Involvement Is Safe for Common Elective General Surgery Procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sehat O, Yu JB, Kunac Y, et al. Declining Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy in Acute Care Surgical Cases. J Surg Res. 2023;281:328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. “Participant Use Data File (PUF).” ACS, https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/accreditation-and-verification/metabolic-and-bariatric-surgery-accreditation-and-quality-improvement-program/participant-use-data-file-puf/. Accessed 15 July 2023.

  13. Arbat T, Raheem KJ, Mckillop E, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes when assisted by fellows and residents: an MBSAQIP analysis of 477,670 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(5):651–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McClellan JM, Nelson D, Porta CR, et al. Bariatric surgery patient perceptions and willingness to consent to resident participation. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):1065–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim T, Altieri DA, Talamini MS, et al. Bariatric Outcomes are Significantly Improved in Hospitals with Fellowship Council-Accredited Bariatric Fellowships. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(4):594–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aminian C, Khorgami RM, Andalib Z, et al. A Challenge between Trainee Education and Patient Safety: Does Fellow Participation Impact Postoperative Outcomes Follow, Bariatric Surgery? Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):1999–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boza L, Buckel F, Riquelme E, et al. Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasten C, Trakimas AC, Manwaring L, et al. Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):702–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wojcik L, Peponis JM, Amari T, et al. Do Not Blame the Resident: the Impact of Surgeon and Surgical Trainee, Experience on the Occurrence of Intraoperative Adverse Events (iAEs) in Abdominal Surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):e156–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Wesley Vosburg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Trainee involvement in SG leads to longer operative times.

• Trainee involvement is not associated with a clinically significant increase in morbidity and mortality.

• There is a role for focused bariatric surgery curriculum in general surgery resident education.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoagland, D., Olasky, J., Kent, T.S. et al. The Impact of Trainee Involvement on Outcomes in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 33, 3454–3462 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06831-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06831-9

Keywords

Navigation