Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominoplasty: Pitfalls and Prospects

  • Review
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abdominoplasty is the cosmetic surgery of the abdomen that typically involves removing excess skin fat and tightening of abdominal muscles. The procedure is commonly requested to restore pre-pregnancy appearance in women, maintain youthful physique, and lose weight in obese population. Techniques of modern abdominoplasty surgery have been primarily developed in the last 40 years concentrating on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, as well as the muscular abdominal wall for maximum esthetic outcome. Many procedures have been combined and modified to achieve these goals. We present an insight of the development of abdominoplasty considering the pitfalls and advancements improving patient outcomes. The result of this work will provide a deeper perspective to the current research around abdominoplasty in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matarasso A. Abdominolipoplasty: a system of classification and treatment for combined abdominoplasty and suction-assisted lipectomy. Aesthetic Surg J. 1991;15(1):111–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matarasso A. Abdominolipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16(2):289–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matarasso A. Abdominplasty. In: Achaner BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B, et al., editors. Plastic surgery. Indications, operations and outcomes. Aesthetic surgery. St Louis; 2000. p. 2783–821.

  4. Shestak KC. Short scar abdominoplasty update. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37(3):505–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidal P, Berner JE, Will PA. Managing complications in abdominoplasty: a literature review. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(5):457–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Marsh DJ, Fox A, Grobbelaar AO, et al. Abdominoplasty and seroma: a prospective randomised study comparing scalpel and handheld electrocautery dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2015;68(2):192–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith MM, Lin MP, Hovsepian RV, et al. Postoperative seroma formation after abdominoplasty with placement of continuous infusion local anesthetic pain pump. Can J Plast Surg. 2009;17(4):127–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Martino M, Nahas FX, Kimura AK, et al. Natural evolution of seroma in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(4):691e–8e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollock TA, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty: a review of 597 consecutive cases. Aesthetic Surg J. 2012;32(6):729–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jabbour S, Awaida C, Mhawej R, et al. Does the addition of progressive tension sutures to drains reduce seroma incidence after abdominoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Surg J. 2016;37(4):440–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JC, Teitelbaum J, Shajan JK, et al. The effect of fibrin sealant on the prevention of seroma formation after postbariatric abdominoplasty. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(3):178–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baroudi R, Ferreira CA. Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J. 1998;18(6):439–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Avelar JM. Abdominoplasty: a new technique without undermining and fat layer removal. Arq Catarinense Med. 2000;29:147–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pollock H, Pollock T. Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2583–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pilone V, Vitiello A, Borriello C, et al. The use of a fibrin glue with a low concentration of thrombin decreases seroma formation in postbariatric patients undergoing circular abdominoplasty. Obes Surg. 2015;25(2):354–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma P, Vazquez Guillamet LJ, Miljkovic G. Atypical mycobacterial infection after abdominoplasty overseas: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2016;2016

  17. Araco A, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. Wound infections in aesthetic abdominoplasties: the role of smoking. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):305e–10e.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez Q. Treatment of large skin necrosis following a modified avelar abdominoplasty with the Erchonia EML 635 nm laser and platelet-rich plasma. Am J Cosmetic Surg. 2009;26(1):29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newall G, Ruiz-Razura A, Mentz HA, et al. A retrospective study on the use of a low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboembolism prophylaxis in large-volume liposuction and body contouring procedures. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;30(1):86.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Avelar JM. Abdominoplasty combined with lipoplasty without panniculus undermining: abdominolipoplasty-a safe technique. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33(1):79–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grazer FM, Goldwyn RM. Abdominoplasty assessed by survey, with emphasis on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(4):513–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. David JS, Spann C, Marcotte G, et al. Haemorrhagic shock, therapeutic management. Ann Fr Anesth. 2013;32(7–8):497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tatsuta S, Morioka D, Murakami N, et al. Chronic expanding hematoma following abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(1):117–20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Staalesen T, Elander A, Strandell A, et al. A systematic review of outcomes of abdominoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(3–4):139–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hatef DA, Kenkel JM, Nguyen MQ, et al. Thromboembolic risk assessment and the efficacy of enoxaparin prophylaxis in excisional body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(1):269–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pancholi S, Cuzalina A. Venous thromboembolism in abdominoplasty patients: a study of incidence and prophylaxis recommendations. Am J Cosmetic Surg. 2007;24(2):66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marangi GF, Segreto F, Poccia I, et al. Thromboprophylaxis in abdominoplasty: efficacy and safety of a complete perioperative protocol. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(4):360–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Avelar JM. New concepts on abdominoplasty and further applications: Springer; 2016.

  29. Vieira BL, Chow I, Sinno S, et al. Is there a limit? A risk assessment model of liposuction and lipoaspirate volume on complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(4):892–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Derrick D, Crawford L, Sheridan J, et al. Teen aesthetic surgery may eliminate bullying. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2017;4(10):178–84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Correa MAF. Minimally invasive robotic abdominoplasty. Adv Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;1(2):91–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Nayar H, et al. Medial thigh lift in the massive weight loss population: outcomes and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):98–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Muresan C, Brownstein GM, Shureih SF. Abdominoplasty-derived dermal-fat graft augmentation gluteoplasty. Aesthetic Surg J. 2014;34(8):1234–43.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Colebunders B, Van Landuyt K. Abdominoplasty and gluteoplasty after massive weight loss: an all-in-one technique. Acta Chir Belg. 2017;117(2):84–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuma Jr P, Batista BP, Milan LS, et al. Vertical abdominoplasty for treatment of excess abdominal skin after massive weight loss. Rev Bras Cir Plsst. 2012;27(3):445–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Petrakis I, Xenaki S, Andreou A, et al. Therapeutic abdominoplasty: report of a case. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;8:96–9.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Winocour J, Gupta V, Ramirez JR, et al. Abdominoplasty: risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):597e–606e.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grieco M, Grignaffini E, Simonacci F, et al. Analysis of complications in postbariatric abdominoplasty: our experience. Plast Surg Int. 2015;2015

  39. Eid I, Birch DW, Sharma AM, et al. Complications associated with adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a surgeon’s guide. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Georgiou CA, Nguyen PS, Casanova D. Delayed complications in abdominoplasty: a case of a ten-year-old abdominoplasty abscess. In: Aesthetic Plast Surg Abdomen. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 493–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dutot MC, Serror K, Al Ameri O, et al. Improving safety after abdominoplasty: a retrospective review of 1128 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(2):355–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Modarressi A, Rüegg EM, Bezzola T, et al. Circular abdominoplasty after massive weight loss: is it a risky procedure? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(11):1497–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosa SC, Macedo JL, Casulari LA, et al. Anthropometric and clinical profiles of post-bariatric patients submitted to procedures in plastic surgery. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(2):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vu MM, Ellis MF, Blough JT, et al. Development and internal validation of the abdominoplasty risk calculator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(1):34e–45e.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Warner JP, Gutowski KA. Abdominoplasty with progressive tension closure using a barbed suture technique. Aesthetic Surg J. 2009;29(3):221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xiao X, Ye L. Efficacy and safety of scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):585–90.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pilone V, Tramontano S, Cutolo C, et al. Abdominoplasty after bariatric surgery: comparison of three different techniques. Minerva Chir. 2019;30

  48. Giordano S, Kangas R, Veräjänkorva E, et al. Ligasure impact™ might reduce blood loss, complications, and re-operation occurrence after abdominoplasty in massive-weight-loss patients: a comparative study. Scand J Surg. 2019;1457496919828237

  49. Saariniemi KM, Salmi AM, Peltoniemi HH, et al. Abdominoplasty improves quality of life, psychological distress, and eating disorder symptoms: a prospective study. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:197232.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nayef A. Louri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Louri, N.A., Ammar, H.M., Abdulkariml, F.A. et al. Abdominoplasty: Pitfalls and Prospects. OBES SURG 30, 1112–1117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04367-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04367-5

Keywords

Navigation