Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in 25 Morbidly Obese Patients

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently come to be performed as a sole bariatric operation. The postoperative morbidity and mortality are cause for concern, and possibly are related to non-standardized surgical technique.

Methods

The following is the surgical LSG technique used in 25 morbidly obese patients. Five trocars are used. Division of the vascular supply of the greater gastric curvature is begun at 6–7 cm proximal to the pylorus, proceeding to the angle of His. A 50-Fr calibrating bougie is positioned against the lesser curvature. The LSG is created using a linear staplercutter device with one 4.1-mm green load for the antrum, followed by five to seven sequential 3.5-mm blue loads for the remaining gastric corpus and fundus. The staple-line is inverted by placing a seroserosal continuous absorbable suture over the bougie from the angle of His .The resected stomach is removed through the 12-mm trocar, and a Jackson-Pratt drain is left along the suture-line.

Results

The mean operative time was 120 minutes, and length of hospital stay was 4 ± 2 days.There were no conversions to open procedures. There were no postoperative complications (no hemorrhage from the staple-line, no anastomotic leakage, no stricture) and no mortality. In 1 patient, cholecystectomy was also done, and in 4, a gastric band was removed. During a median follow-up of 4 months, BMI decreased from 43 ± 5 kg/m2 to 34 ± 6 kg/m2, and the % excess BMI loss was 49 ± 25%.

Conclusions

The proposed surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure for morbid obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mognol P, Chosidow C, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1030–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar G et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2006, 20: 859–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: Effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1024–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1327–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roa PA, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1323–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 1998; 8: 267–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 408–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almogy G, Crookes PF, Anthone GJ. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for high-risk super-obese patients. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to endoscopic intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 615–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in superobese high-risk patients. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotidis EV, Koliakos G, Papavramidis TS et al. The effect of biliopancreatic diversion with pylorus-preserving sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switch on fasting serum ghrelin, leptin and adiponectin levels: Is there a hormonal contribution to the weight-reducing effect of this procedure? Obes Surg 2006; 16: 554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Han SM, Kim WW, Oh JH. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at 1 year in morbidly obese Korean patients. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Felberbauer FX et al. Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity? Obes Surg 2006; 16: 166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, Bou R et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 1535–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trichak S. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1434–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Rubin MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Givon-Madhala, O., Spector, R., Wasserberg, N. et al. Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in 25 Morbidly Obese Patients. OBES SURG 17, 722–727 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9133-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9133-z

Key words

Navigation