Abstract
Allometry has been a paradigm of constraints, including intrinsic constraints on the evolvability of allometry, as a source of developmental and genetic constraints on the evolution of form, and of functional constraints, maintaining functional equivalence as body size evolves. Yet, allometry may be the simplest case of varied constraints, and of morphological integration, even though allometry itself is not simple. Evolutionary allometry may be especially complex because it depends not only on developmental origins of allometry and determinants of allometric variation but also on the evolutionary dynamics of size and shape. It should also depend on the ecological opportunity for size-dependent ecomorphological specialization. We predict that lineages that converge in those would exhibit similar evolutionary allometries but otherwise, evolutionary allometries would be heterogeneous. Countering this expectation are familiar craniofacial evolutionary allometries, often ascribed to developmental bias. To test both those hypotheses, we compare evolutionary allometries of mandibles across lineages of squirrels and evolutionary to growth allometries. As expected, lineages that converge on size-dependent specializations exhibit similar evolutionary allometries, but otherwise their allometries are no more similar than expected by chance. Growth allometries of squirrels (and a cricetid rodent) slightly resemble the evolutionary allometry of one lineage, but growth allometries of species from other lineages are orthogonal to their own lineages’ evolutionary allometry. We would expect that craniofacial allometries that are not brain-driven would, like mandibular evolutionary allometries, be predictable only from size-dependent ecological specializations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets analysed during the current study are provided in the supplementary materials. The complete dataset, including the data for all individuals is available at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtj5j.
References
Adams, D. C. (2014). A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Systematic Biology, 63(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu030
Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2009). A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution, 63(5), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00649.x
Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2018a). Multivariate phylogenetic comparative methods: Evaluations, comparisons, and recommendations. Systematic Biology, 67(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syx055
Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2018b). Phylogenetic ANOVA: Group-clade aggregation, biological challenges, and a refined permutation procedure. Evolution, 72(6), 1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13492
Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L., & Kaliontzopoulou, A. (2020). Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. In: (Version R package 3.2.1)
Adams, D. C., & Nistri, A. (2010). Ontogenetic-convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). Bmc Evolutionary Biology, 10, 216.
Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., & Wake, D. B. (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny [Article]. Paleobiology, 5(3), 296–317.
Anderson, M. J., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2003). Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 73(2), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0094965021000015558
Baken, E. K., Collyer, M. L., Kaliontzopoulou, A., & Adams, D. C. (2021). geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12(12), 2355–2363. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13723
Bastir, M., Rosas, A., Stringer, C., Cuetara, J. M., Kruszynski, R., Weber, G. W., Ross, C. F., & Ravosa, M. J. (2010). Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 58(5), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.03.001
Bergmann, I., Hublin, J. J., Gunz, P., & Freidline, S. E. (2021). How did modern morphology evolve in the human mandible? The relationship between static adult allometry and mandibular variability in Homo sapiens. Journal of Human Evolution, 157, 103026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103026
von Bertalanffy, L., & Pirozynski, W. J. (1952). Ontogenetic and evolutionary allometry. Evolution, 6(4), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1952.tb01438.x
von Bertalanffy, L., & v. (1964). Basic concepts in quantitative biology of metabolism. Helgolander Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 9(1–4), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01610024
Bjorklund, M. (1999). The importance of evolutionary constraints in ecological time scales. Evolutionary Ecology, 10, 423–431.
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., Jr., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717–745.
Boell, L. (2013). Lines of least resistance and genetic architecture of house mouse (Mus musculus) mandible shape. Evolution & Development, 15(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12033
Bookstein, F. L. (1997). Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, 1, 97–118.
Bright, J. A., Marugan-Lobon, J., Rayfield, E. J., & Cobb, S. N. (2019). The multifactorial nature of beak and skull shape evolution in parrots and cockatoos (Psittaciformes). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1432-1
Bruner, E., Martin-Loeches, M., & Colom, R. (2010). Human midsagittal brain shape variation: Patterns, allometry and integration. Journal of Anatomy, 216(5), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01221.x
Cardini, A. (2019). Craniofacial allometry is a rule in evolutionary radiations of placentals. Evolutionary Biology, 46(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-019-09477-7
Cardini, A., & Elton, S. (2008). Variation in guenon skulls (II): Sexual dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 54(5), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.09.023
Cardini, A., Polly, D., Dawson, R., & Milne, N. (2015). Why the long face? Kangaroos and wallabies follow the same ‘rule’ of cranial evolutionary allometry (CREA) as placentals. Evolutionary Biology, 42(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9308-9
Cardini, A., & Polly, P. D. (2013). Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form. Nature Communications, 4, 2458. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3458
Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2007). Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic changes in ecological studies. Ecology, 88, 683–692.
Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2013). Phenotypic trajectory analysis: Comparison of shape change patterns in evolution and ecology. Hystrix-Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6298
Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2018). RRPP: An R package for fitting linear models to high-dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(7), 1772–1779. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13029
Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2019). RRPP: Linear Model Evaluation with Randomized Residuals in a Permutation Procedure. In: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RRPP
Collyer, M. L., Sekora, D. J., & Adams, D. C. (2015). A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high-dimensional data [Article]. Heredity, 115(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.75
Drake, A. G., & Klingenberg, C. P. (2008). The pace of morphological change: Historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs. Proceedings of the Biological Sciences, 275(1630), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1169
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., & Hublin, J. J. (2015). Ontogenetic and static allometry in the human face: Contrasting Khoisan and Inuit. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 158(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22759
Fruciano, C. (2019). Geometric morphometrics mix: Miscellaneous functions useful for geometric morphometrics. In: (Version 0.0.8.4000.)
van der Geer, A. A. E., Lyras, G. A., Mitteroecker, P., & MacPhee, R. D. E. (2018). From jumbo to dumbo: Cranial shape changes in elephants and hippos during phyletic dwarfing. Evolutionary Biology, 45(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9451-1
Giles, E. (1957). Cranial allometry in the great apes. Human Biology, 28, 43–58.
Gould, S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 41(4), 587–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01624.x
Gould, S. J. (1975a). Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and evolution of brain. Contributions to Primatology, 5, 244–292.
Gould, S. J. (1975b). On the scaling of tooth size in mammals. American Zoologist, 15(2), 351–362.
Green, W. D. K. (1996). The thin-plate spline and images with curving features. In K. V. Mardia, C. A. Gill, & I. L. Dryden (Eds.), Image Fusion and Shape Variability (pp. 79–87). University of Leeds Press.
Hallgrimsson, B., Katz, D. C., Aponte, J. D., Larson, J. R., Devine, J., Gonzalez, P. N., Young, N. M., Roseman, C. C., & Marcucio, R. S. (2019). Integration and the developmental genetics of allometry. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(5), 1369–1381. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz105
Hemmer, H. (1966). Allometric studies of skulls of Homo sapiens with special refererence to problem of brachycephalization. Homo, 17(3–4), 190–209.
Herring, S. W. (2007). Masticatory muscles and the skull: A comparative perspective. Archives of Oral Biology, 52(4), 296–299.
Herring, S. W., Rafferty, K. L., Liu, Z. J., & Marshall, C. D. (2001). Jaw muscles and the skull in mammals: The biomechanics of mastication. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology a-Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 131(1), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00472-x
Huxley, J. S. (1924). Constant differential growth ratios and their significance. Nature, 114, 895–896. https://doi.org/10.1038/114895a0
Jablonski, D. (2020). Developmental bias, macroevolution, and the fossil record. Evolution & Development, 22(1–2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12313
Kramer, G. (1959). Die funktionelle Beurteilung von Vorgangen relativen Wachstums. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 162, 243–268.
Krone, I. W., Kammerer, C. F., & Angielczyk, K. D. (2019). The many faces of synapsid cranial allometry. Paleobiology, 45(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2019.26
Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: Body size allometry. Evolution, 33(1), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x
Larson, J. R., Manyama, M. F., Cole, J. B., Gonzalez, P. N., Percival, C. J., Liberton, D. K., Ferrara, T. M., Riccardi, S. L., Kimwaga, E. A., Mathayo, J., Spitzmacher, J. A., Rolian, C., Jamniczky, H. A., Weinberg, S. M., Roseman, C. C., Klein, O., Lukowiak, K., Spritz, R. A., & Hallgrimsson, B. (2018). Body size and allometric variation in facial shape in children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 165(2), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23356
Li, S. (2011). Concise formulas for the area and volume of a hyperspherical cap. Asian Journal of Mathematics & Statistics, 4, 66–70.
Linde-Medina, M. (2016). Testing the cranial evolutionary allometric ‘rule’ in Galliformes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(9), 1873–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12918
Lumer, H. (1940). Evolutionary allometry in the skeleton of the domesticated dog. American Naturalist, 74, 439–467. https://doi.org/10.1086/280912
Marcy, A. E., Guillerme, T., Sherratt, E., Rowe, K. C., Phillips, M. J., & Weisbecker, V. (2020). Australian rodents reveal conserved cranial evolutionary allometry across 10 million years of murid evolution. The American Naturalist, 196(6), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1086/711398
Marroig, G., & Cheverud, J. M. (2005). Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: Diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution, 59(5), 1128–1142.
McMahon, T. A. (1975). Allometry and biomechanics: Limb bones in adult ungulates. American Naturalist, 109(969), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1086/283026
Menendez, I., Cano, A. R. G., Cantalapiedra, J. L., Pelaez-Campomanes, P., Alvarez-Sierra, M. A., & Fernandez, M. H. (2021). A multi-layered approach to the diversification of squirrels. Mammal Review, 51(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12215
Mitchell, D. R., Sherratt, E., Ledogar, J. A., & Wroe, S. (2018). The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 285(1881), 20180845. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0845
Ocampo, D., Barrantes, G., & Uy, J. A. C. (2018). Morphological adaptations for relatively larger brains in hummingbird skulls. Ecology and Evolution, 8(21), 10482–10488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4513
Pagel, M. (1997). Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta, 26(4), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x
Pagel, M. (1999). Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401(6756), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/44766
Pelabon, C., Bolstad, G. H., Egset, C. K., Cheverud, J. M., Pavlicev, M., & Rosenqvist, G. (2013). On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry. American Naturalist, 181(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/668820
Pennell, M. W., Eastman, J. M., Slater, G. J., Brown, J. W., Uyeda, J. C., FitzJohn, R. G., Alfaro, M. E., & Harmon, L. J. (2014). Geiger v2.0: An expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 30(15), 2216–2218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu181
Pilbeam, D., & Gould, S. J. (1974). Size and scaling in human evolution. Science, 186(4167), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.186.4167.892
Pyron, R. A., & Burbrink, F. T. (2009). Body size as a primary determinant of ecomorphological diversification and the evolution of mimicry in the lampropeltinine snakes (Serpentes: Colubridae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(10), 2057–2067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01820.x
R_Core_Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computin. https://www.R-project.org/}
Radinsky, L. B. (1981). Evolution of skull shape in carnivores. 1. Representative modern carnivores. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 15(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00770.x
Radinsky, L. B. (1984). Basicrainial axis length vs skull length in analysis of carnivore skull shape. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 22(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00797.x
Rensch, B. (1948). Histological changes correlated with evolutionary changes of body size. Evolution, 2(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405381
Revell, L. J. (2010). Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(4), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00044.x
Robb, R. C. (1935). A study of mutations in evolution I Evolution in the equine skull. Journal of Genetics, 31(1), 39–46.
Robb, R. C. (1935). Study of mutations in evolution II Ontogeny in the equine skull. Journal of Genetics, 31(1), 47–52.
Rohlf, F. J. (2017). tpsDig2. In (Version 2.31)
Ross, C. F., Henneberg, M., Ravosa, M. J., & Richard, S. (2004). Curvilinear, geometric and phylogenetic modeling of basicranial flexion: Is it adaptive, is it constrained? Journal of Human Evolution, 46(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.11.001
Savageau, M. A. (1979). Allometric morphogenesis of complex systems: derivation of the basic equations from first principles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 76, 6023–6025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC411791/pdf/pnas00012-0007.pdf
Schlager, S. (2017). Morpho and Rvcg—Shape analysis in {R}. In G. Zheng, S. Li, & G. Szekely (Eds.), Statistical shape and deformation analysis (pp. 217–256). Academic Press.
Schluter, D. (1996). Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution, 50(5), 1766–1774. https://doi.org/10.2307/2410734
Shea, B. T. (1983). Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330620307
Singleton, M. (2012). Postnatal cranial development in papionin primates: An alternative model for hominin evolutionary development. Evolutionary Biology, 39(4), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-011-9153-4
Slater, G. J., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (2009). Allometry and performance: The evolution of skull form and function in felids. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(11), 2278–2287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01845.x
Smaers, J. B., Rothman, R. S., Hudson, D. R., Balanoff, A. M., Beatty, B., Dechmann, D. K. N., de Vries, D., Dunn, J. C., Fleagle, J. G., Gilbert, C. C., Goswami, A., Iwaniuk, A. N., Jungers, W. L., Kerney, M., Ksepka, D. T., Manger, P. R., Mongle, C. S., Rohlf, F. J., Smith, N. A., & Safi, K. (2021). The evolution of mammalian brain size. Science Advances, 7(18), eabe2101. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe2101
Swanson, E. M., Holekamp, K. E., Lundrigan, B. L., Arsznov, B. M., & Sakai, S. T. (2012). Multiple determinants of whole and regional brain volume among terrestrial carnivorans. Plos One, 7(6), e38447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038447
Swiderski, D. L., & Zelditch, M. L. (2010). Morphological diversity despite isometric scaling of lever arms. Evolutionary Biology, 37(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9081-8
Tamagnini, D., Meloro, C., & Cardini, A. (2017). Anyone with a long-face? Craniofacial evolutionary allometry (CREA) in a family of short-faced mammals, the felidae. Evolutionary Biology, 44(4), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-017-9421-z
Thomas, G. H., & Freckleton, R. P. (2012). motmot: Models of trait macroevolution on trees. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00132.x
Throckmorton, G. S., Finn, R. A., & Bell, W. H. (1980). Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. American Journal of Orthodontics, 77(4), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90106-2
Voje, K. L., Hansen, T. F., Egset, C. K., Bolstad, G. H., & Pelabon, C. (2014). Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry. Evolution, 68(3), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12312
Watanabe, J. (2022). Detecting (non)parallel evolution in multidimensional spaces: Angles, correlations and eigenanalysis. Biology Letters, 18(2), 20210638. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0638
Wayne, R. K. (1986). Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids: The influence of development on morphological change. Evolution, 40(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408805
Weidenreich, F. (1941). The brain and its role in the phylogenetic transformation of the human skull. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 31(5), 321–442.
Weisbecker, V., Rowe, T., Wroe, S., Macrini, T. E., Garland, K. L. S., Travouillon, K. J., Black, K., Archer, M., Hand, S. J., Berlin, J. C., Beck, R. M. D., Ladeveze, S., Sharp, A. C., Mardon, K., & Sherratt, E. (2021). Global elongation and high shape flexibility as an evolutionary hypothesis of accommodating mammalian brains into skulls. Evolution, 75(3), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14163
Wroe, S., & Milne, N. (2007). Convergence and remarkably consistent constraint in the evolution of carnivore skull shape. Evolution, 61(5), 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00101.x
Zelditch, M. L., Calamari, Z. T., & Swiderski, D. L. (2016). Disparate postnatal ontogenies do not add to the shape disparity of infants. Evolutionary Biology, 43(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9370-y
Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., & Sheets, H. D. (2012). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Zelditch, M. L., Wood, A. R., & Swiderski, D. L. (2009). Building developmental integration into functional systems: Function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-008-9034-7
Zelditch, M. L., Ye, J., Mitchell, J. S., & Swiderski, D. L. (2017). Rare ecomorphological convergence on a complex adaptive landscape: Body size and diet mediate evolution of jaw shape in squirrels (Sciuridae). Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13168
Acknowledgements
We thank the curators and staff for access to the specimens in their care: P. Tucker and P. Myers (University of Michigan Museum of Zoology); E. Lacey (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology); R. Thorington and K. Helgen (National Museum of Natural History); and L. Heaney and B. Patterson (Field Museum of Natural History).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MLZ and DLS collected the data and designed the study. MLZ drafted the manuscript text, conducted analyses and prepared figures and tables. DLS edited the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
No experiments were done; all data come from museum collections.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L. The Predictable Complexity of Evolutionary Allometry. Evol Biol 50, 56–77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-022-09581-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-022-09581-1