Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolutionary Development in Australopithecus africanus

  • Synthesis Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary developmental biology is quickly transforming our understanding of how lineages evolve through the modification of ontogenetic processes. Yet, while great strides have been made in the study of neontological forms, it is much more difficult to apply the principles of evo-devo to the miserly fossil record. Because fossils are static entities, we as researchers can only infer evolution and development by drawing connections between them. The choices of how we join specimens together—juveniles to adults to study ontogeny, taxon to taxon to study evolution—can dramatically affect our results. Here, I examine paedomorphism in the fossil hominin species Australopithecus africanus. Using extant African apes as proxies for ancestral hominin morphology, I demonstrate that Sts 71 is most similar to a sub-adult African ape, suggesting that A. africanus is paedomorphic relative to the presumed ancestral form. I then plot ontogenetic size and shape in extant great apes, humans, and A. africanus in order to assess patterns of ontogenetic allometry. Results indicate that ontogenetic allometry in A. africanus, subsequent to M1 occlusion is similar to that in modern humans and bonobos; gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans share a different pattern of size-shape relationship. Combined with results from the analysis of paedomorphism plus knowledge about the developmental chronologies of this group, these findings suggest that paedomorphism in A. africanus arises relatively early in ontogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, R. R., & Krovitz, G. E. (2002). Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 269, 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., & Wake, D. B. (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology, 5, 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemseged, Z., Spoor, F., Kimbel, W. H., Bobe, R., Geraads, D., Reed, D., et al. (2006). A juvenile early hominin skeleton from Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature, 443, 296–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antón, S. C. (1997). Developmental age and taxonomic affinity of the Mojokerto child, Java, Indonesia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 497–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antón, S. C., & Leigh, S. R. (2003). Growth and life history in Homo erectus. In J. L. Thompson, G. L. Krovitz, & A. J. Nelson (Eds.), Patterns of growth and development in the Genus Homo (pp. 219–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E., Zilles, K., Kurtis, M., & Schleicher, A. (1991). Cortical folding, the lunate sulcus and the evolution of the human brain. Journal of Human Evolution, 209, 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastir, M., & Rosas, A. (2004). Comparative ontogeny in humans and chimpanzees: Similarities, differences and paradoxes in postnatal growth and development of the skull. Annals of Anatomy, 186, 503–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L. R., de Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., Schmid, P., Carlson, K. J., Dirks, P. H. G. M., et al. (2010). Australopithecus sediba: A new species of Homo-like australopith from South Africa. Science, 328, 195–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, A. D., & Dean, M. C. (1988). Distinct dental development patterns in early fossil hominids. Nature, 335, 509–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L. (1996). Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. P. J. Naylor, & D. E. Slice (Eds.), Advances in morphometrics (pp. 131–151). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, T. G. (1985). Taung facial remodeling: A growth and development study. In P. V. Tobias (Ed.), Hominid evolution: Past, present and future (pp. 239–245). New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, T. G. (1989). Ontogeny of the early hominid face. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 751–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, T. G., & Dean, M. C. (1985). Re-evaluation of the age at death of immature fossil hominids. Nature, 317, 525–527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, S. N., & O’Higgins, P. (2004). Hominins do not share a common postnatal facial ontogenetic shape trajectory. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B—Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 302B, 302–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, G. C., & Vannier, M. W. (1987). Dental development of the Taung skull from computerized tomography. Nature, 329, 625–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coqueugniot, H., Hublin, J.-J., Veillon, F., Houët, F., & Jacob, T. (2004). Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature, 431, 299–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa. Nature, 115, 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. C., Leakey, M. G., Reid, D. J., Schrenk, F., Schwartz, G. T., Stringer, C., et al. (2001). Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature, 414, 628–631.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. C., & Lucas, V. S. (2009). Dental and skeletal growth in early fossil hominins. Annals of Human Biology, 36, 545–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. (1980). A reanalysis of the South African australopithecine natural endocasts. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53, 525–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D., Hildebolt, C., & Vannier, M. W. (1989). Reassessment of the Taung early hominid from a neurological perspective. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (1995). What’s growth got to do with it? Process and product in the evolution of ontogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 29, 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, C. R. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 53, 285–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Neubauer, S., Bookstein, F. L., & Weber, G. W. (2005). Are Paranthropus crania only scaled variants of gracile australopithecines? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 40(Suppl), 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloway, R. L. (1992). The failure of the gyrification index (GI) to account for volumetric reorganization in the evolution of the human brain. Journal of Human Evolution, 22, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacruz, R. S., Ramirez-Rozzi, F., & Bromage, T. G. (2005). Dental enamel hypoplasia, age at death, and weaning in the Taung child. South African Journal of Science, 101, 567–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R., Shah, N., & Buchanan, L. S. (2003). Ontogeny and phylogeny in papionin primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 45, 285–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E., McBratney, B. M., & Krovitz, G. (2002). The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 1134–1139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A. (1999). Sexual dimorphism in the face of Australopithecus africanus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 108, 97–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, K. P. (2010). Apes and tricksters: The evolution and diversification of humans’ closest relatives. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, K. P., Frost, S. R., & Strait, D. S. (2006). Examining affinities of the Taung child by developmental simulation. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 274–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M. A., Albrecht, G. H., & Gelvin, B. R. (2004). Craniometric variation in early Homo compared to modern gorillas: A population-thinking approach. In F. Anapol, R. Z. German, & N. Jablonski (Eds.), Shaping primate evolution: Form, function, and behavior (pp. 66–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K., & Bookstein, F. L. (2004). Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 679–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: A comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes. Evolution & Development, 7(3), 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce de León, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2001). Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature, 412, 534–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R. A. (2007). Written in stone: fossils, genes and evo–devo. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 911–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rak, Y. (1983). The australopithecine face. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990). Methods for comparison of sets of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens, Y. (2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Series IIA—Earth and Planetary Science, 332, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T. (1989). Heterochrony in human evolution: The case for neoteny reconsidered. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 32, 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T. (2002). Are some basic heterochronic transformations more likely than others? In S. T. Parker, J. Langer, & M. L. McKinney (Eds.), Human evolution through developmental change (pp. 181–214). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. W., Lovejoy, C. O., & Meindl, R. S. (1991). Relative dental development in hominoids and its failure to predict somatic growth velocity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. H. (1986). Dental development in Australopithecus and early Homo. Nature, 343, 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M., Tafforeau, P., Reid, D. J., Grün, R., Eggins, S., Boutakiout, M., et al. (2007a). Earliest evidence of modern human life history in North African early Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 6128–6133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M., Toussaint, M., Reid, D. J., Olejniczak, A. J., & Hublin, J.-J. (2007b). Rapid dental development in a Middle Paleolithic Belgian Neanderthal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 20220–20225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strait, D. S., Grine, F. E., & Moniz, M. A. (1997). A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 17–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strand Viðarsdóttir, U., O’Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. (2002). The development of regionally distinct facial morphologies: A geometric morphometric study of population-specific differences in the growth of the modern human facial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy, 201, 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. D., Asfaw, B., Beyene, Y., Haile-Selassie, Y., Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa, G., et al. (2009). Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominids. Science, 326, 75–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. L., Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (2002). Heterochrony and the evolution of Neandertal and modern human craniofacial form. In N. Minugh-Purvis & K. J. McNamara (Eds.), Human evolution through developmental change (pp. 405–441). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. L., Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (2003). Diagnosing heterochronic perturbations in the craniofacial evolution of Homo (Neandertals and modern humans) and Pan (P. troglodytes and P. paniscus). In J. L. Thompson, G. E. Krovitz, & A. J. Nelson (Eds.). Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo (pp. 295–319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Philipp Mitteroecker and Philipp Gunz for inviting me to participate in the Human Evo-Devo workshop in Altenberg, Austria. As always, their comments and suggestions have greatly improved my understanding of these complicated topics. I also thank Gerd Müller and the staff of the Konrad Lorenz Institute for hosting such a spectacular workshop, and the participants for providing me with an excellent educational experience. This is NYCEP Morphometrics Group contribution #64.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kieran P. McNulty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNulty, K.P. Evolutionary Development in Australopithecus africanus . Evol Biol 39, 488–498 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9172-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9172-9

Keywords

Navigation