Abstract
Evolutionary developmental biology is quickly transforming our understanding of how lineages evolve through the modification of ontogenetic processes. Yet, while great strides have been made in the study of neontological forms, it is much more difficult to apply the principles of evo-devo to the miserly fossil record. Because fossils are static entities, we as researchers can only infer evolution and development by drawing connections between them. The choices of how we join specimens together—juveniles to adults to study ontogeny, taxon to taxon to study evolution—can dramatically affect our results. Here, I examine paedomorphism in the fossil hominin species Australopithecus africanus. Using extant African apes as proxies for ancestral hominin morphology, I demonstrate that Sts 71 is most similar to a sub-adult African ape, suggesting that A. africanus is paedomorphic relative to the presumed ancestral form. I then plot ontogenetic size and shape in extant great apes, humans, and A. africanus in order to assess patterns of ontogenetic allometry. Results indicate that ontogenetic allometry in A. africanus, subsequent to M1 occlusion is similar to that in modern humans and bonobos; gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans share a different pattern of size-shape relationship. Combined with results from the analysis of paedomorphism plus knowledge about the developmental chronologies of this group, these findings suggest that paedomorphism in A. africanus arises relatively early in ontogeny.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackermann, R. R., & Krovitz, G. E. (2002). Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 269, 142–147.
Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., & Wake, D. B. (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology, 5, 296–317.
Alemseged, Z., Spoor, F., Kimbel, W. H., Bobe, R., Geraads, D., Reed, D., et al. (2006). A juvenile early hominin skeleton from Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature, 443, 296–301.
Antón, S. C. (1997). Developmental age and taxonomic affinity of the Mojokerto child, Java, Indonesia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 497–514.
Antón, S. C., & Leigh, S. R. (2003). Growth and life history in Homo erectus. In J. L. Thompson, G. L. Krovitz, & A. J. Nelson (Eds.), Patterns of growth and development in the Genus Homo (pp. 219–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, E., Zilles, K., Kurtis, M., & Schleicher, A. (1991). Cortical folding, the lunate sulcus and the evolution of the human brain. Journal of Human Evolution, 209, 341–348.
Bastir, M., & Rosas, A. (2004). Comparative ontogeny in humans and chimpanzees: Similarities, differences and paradoxes in postnatal growth and development of the skull. Annals of Anatomy, 186, 503–509.
Berger, L. R., de Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., Schmid, P., Carlson, K. J., Dirks, P. H. G. M., et al. (2010). Australopithecus sediba: A new species of Homo-like australopith from South Africa. Science, 328, 195–204.
Beynon, A. D., & Dean, M. C. (1988). Distinct dental development patterns in early fossil hominids. Nature, 335, 509–514.
Bookstein, F. L. (1996). Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. P. J. Naylor, & D. E. Slice (Eds.), Advances in morphometrics (pp. 131–151). New York: Plenum Press.
Bromage, T. G. (1985). Taung facial remodeling: A growth and development study. In P. V. Tobias (Ed.), Hominid evolution: Past, present and future (pp. 239–245). New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.
Bromage, T. G. (1989). Ontogeny of the early hominid face. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 751–773.
Bromage, T. G., & Dean, M. C. (1985). Re-evaluation of the age at death of immature fossil hominids. Nature, 317, 525–527.
Cobb, S. N., & O’Higgins, P. (2004). Hominins do not share a common postnatal facial ontogenetic shape trajectory. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B—Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 302B, 302–321.
Conroy, G. C., & Vannier, M. W. (1987). Dental development of the Taung skull from computerized tomography. Nature, 329, 625–627.
Coqueugniot, H., Hublin, J.-J., Veillon, F., Houët, F., & Jacob, T. (2004). Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature, 431, 299–302.
Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa. Nature, 115, 195–199.
Dean, M. C., Leakey, M. G., Reid, D. J., Schrenk, F., Schwartz, G. T., Stringer, C., et al. (2001). Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature, 414, 628–631.
Dean, M. C., & Lucas, V. S. (2009). Dental and skeletal growth in early fossil hominins. Annals of Human Biology, 36, 545–561.
Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley.
Falk, D. (1980). A reanalysis of the South African australopithecine natural endocasts. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53, 525–539.
Falk, D., Hildebolt, C., & Vannier, M. W. (1989). Reassessment of the Taung early hominid from a neurological perspective. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 485–492.
Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (1995). What’s growth got to do with it? Process and product in the evolution of ontogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 29, 405–431.
Goodall, C. R. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 53, 285–339.
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40, 33–50.
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Neubauer, S., Bookstein, F. L., & Weber, G. W. (2005). Are Paranthropus crania only scaled variants of gracile australopithecines? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 40(Suppl), 113–114.
Halloway, R. L. (1992). The failure of the gyrification index (GI) to account for volumetric reorganization in the evolution of the human brain. Journal of Human Evolution, 22, 163–170.
Lacruz, R. S., Ramirez-Rozzi, F., & Bromage, T. G. (2005). Dental enamel hypoplasia, age at death, and weaning in the Taung child. South African Journal of Science, 101, 567–569.
Leigh, S. R., Shah, N., & Buchanan, L. S. (2003). Ontogeny and phylogeny in papionin primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 45, 285–316.
Lieberman, D. E., McBratney, B. M., & Krovitz, G. (2002). The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 1134–1139.
Lockwood, C. A. (1999). Sexual dimorphism in the face of Australopithecus africanus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 108, 97–127.
McNulty, K. P. (2010). Apes and tricksters: The evolution and diversification of humans’ closest relatives. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 322–332.
McNulty, K. P., Frost, S. R., & Strait, D. S. (2006). Examining affinities of the Taung child by developmental simulation. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 274–296.
Miller, J. M. A., Albrecht, G. H., & Gelvin, B. R. (2004). Craniometric variation in early Homo compared to modern gorillas: A population-thinking approach. In F. Anapol, R. Z. German, & N. Jablonski (Eds.), Shaping primate evolution: Form, function, and behavior (pp. 66–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K., & Bookstein, F. L. (2004). Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 679–698.
Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: A comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes. Evolution & Development, 7(3), 244–258.
Ponce de León, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2001). Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature, 412, 534–538.
Raff, R. A. (2007). Written in stone: fossils, genes and evo–devo. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 911–919.
Rak, Y. (1983). The australopithecine face. New York: Academic Press.
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990). Methods for comparison of sets of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40–59.
Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens, Y. (2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Series IIA—Earth and Planetary Science, 332, 137–144.
Shea, B. T. (1989). Heterochrony in human evolution: The case for neoteny reconsidered. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 32, 690–702.
Shea, B. T. (2002). Are some basic heterochronic transformations more likely than others? In S. T. Parker, J. Langer, & M. L. McKinney (Eds.), Human evolution through developmental change (pp. 181–214). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Simpson, S. W., Lovejoy, C. O., & Meindl, R. S. (1991). Relative dental development in hominoids and its failure to predict somatic growth velocity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 113–120.
Smith, B. H. (1986). Dental development in Australopithecus and early Homo. Nature, 343, 327–330.
Smith, T. M., Tafforeau, P., Reid, D. J., Grün, R., Eggins, S., Boutakiout, M., et al. (2007a). Earliest evidence of modern human life history in North African early Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 6128–6133.
Smith, T. M., Toussaint, M., Reid, D. J., Olejniczak, A. J., & Hublin, J.-J. (2007b). Rapid dental development in a Middle Paleolithic Belgian Neanderthal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 20220–20225.
Strait, D. S., Grine, F. E., & Moniz, M. A. (1997). A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 17–82.
Strand Viðarsdóttir, U., O’Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. (2002). The development of regionally distinct facial morphologies: A geometric morphometric study of population-specific differences in the growth of the modern human facial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy, 201, 211–229.
White, T. D., Asfaw, B., Beyene, Y., Haile-Selassie, Y., Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa, G., et al. (2009). Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominids. Science, 326, 75–86.
Williams, F. L., Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (2002). Heterochrony and the evolution of Neandertal and modern human craniofacial form. In N. Minugh-Purvis & K. J. McNamara (Eds.), Human evolution through developmental change (pp. 405–441). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Williams, F. L., Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (2003). Diagnosing heterochronic perturbations in the craniofacial evolution of Homo (Neandertals and modern humans) and Pan (P. troglodytes and P. paniscus). In J. L. Thompson, G. E. Krovitz, & A. J. Nelson (Eds.). Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo (pp. 295–319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to Philipp Mitteroecker and Philipp Gunz for inviting me to participate in the Human Evo-Devo workshop in Altenberg, Austria. As always, their comments and suggestions have greatly improved my understanding of these complicated topics. I also thank Gerd Müller and the staff of the Konrad Lorenz Institute for hosting such a spectacular workshop, and the participants for providing me with an excellent educational experience. This is NYCEP Morphometrics Group contribution #64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNulty, K.P. Evolutionary Development in Australopithecus africanus . Evol Biol 39, 488–498 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9172-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9172-9