Skip to main content
Log in

The Transmission of Genes and Culture: A Questionable Analogy

  • Focal Reviews
  • Published:
Evolutionary Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modes of cultural transmission are, by analogy with modes of genetic transmission, ways in which cultural information is transmitted between individuals. Despite its importance across the behavioral sciences and for theories of cultural evolution, no attempts have been made, to our knowledge, to critically analyze this analogy. We here aim at such detailed comparison and show that the fundamental role of modes of transmission in biology results mainly from two properties of genetic transmission: (1) what is transmitted generally does not influence the way in which it is transmitted; (2) there is a limited number of simple and stable modes. In culture however, modes of transmission generally lack these two fundamental properties. In particular, in culture it is often the rate of evolutionary change that determines the mode of transmission. We offer some tentative explanation regarding the origins of such a fundamental difference and we conclude that cultural transmission modes are not causal mechanisms that govern the transmission of culture but mere descriptions of the way culture happens to be transmitted at a given time in a given community. This shows the limit of the analogy between biological and cultural evolution and suggests that evolutionary models and theories differ substantially between the two domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the terms opaque and transparent here after Gergely and Csibra (2006). Sylvia’s recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. Pp. 229–255 in S. Levinson, and N. J. Enfield, eds. Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Berg Publishers, Oxford. We simply extend the use of these terms to the relationship between genes and phenotype. A causal relationship A-B is more opaque than another C-D when the causal path linking A to B is longer and more complex than the one linking C to D. The causal path linking a particular gene (A) to its consequences (B) on the phenotype can be extremely long and complex. This makes it difficult for another gene to evolve to control or modify A in order to have a different effect B’ on the phenotype. By contrast, the causal path linking a certain behavior (C) to a certain effect on the phenotype (D) can be short and simple, making it easier for a third observer for instance to modify and adapt C in order to have a certain desired effect D’.

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1992). Cultural relatedness under oblique and horizontal transmission rules. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes. Human Nature, 12, 351–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (2000a). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (2000b). The life history of culture learning in a face-to-face society. Ethos, 28, 445–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (2002). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., & Clark, G. A. (1997). Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 271, 1443–1450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. G., & Samuelson, L. (1992). Evolutionary stability in repeated games played by finite automata. Journal of Economic Theory, 57, 278–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. J. (1999). The meme machine. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2000). A well disposed social anthropologist’s problem with memes. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2005). Essays on cultural transmission. New York, Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Nunn, C. L., & Towner, M. C. (2006). Cultural macroevolution and the transmission of traits. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 15, 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. J. (2003). Evolution: The history of an idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, E. M. (1956). Cultural transmission and cultural change. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 12, 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Feldman, M. W., Chen, K. H., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science, 218, 19–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. (2003). On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr’s changing views of species, 1942–1959. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 34, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claidière, N., & Sperber, D. (2007). The role of attraction in cultural evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, T. E., Greenhill, S. J., Gray, R. D., Hasegawa, T., & Mace, R. (2010). Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific. Nature, 467, 801–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1982). Some caveats about cultural transmission models. Human Ecology, 10, 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danovitch, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2004). Should you ask a fisherman or a biologist?: Developmental shifts in ways of clustering knowledge. Child Development, 75, 918–931.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deecke, V. B., Ford, J. K. B., & Spong, P. (2000). Dialect change in resident killer whales: Implications for vocal learning and cultural transmission. Animal Behaviour, 60, 629–638.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distin, K. (2005). The selfish meme: A critical reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumersan, T. M., & Ségur, N. (1866). Chansons nationales et populaires de France. Paris: Librairie de Garnier Frères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature advance online publication.

  • Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. W., & Laland, K. N. (1996). Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 453–457.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. W., & Zhivotovsky, L. A. (1992). Gene-culture coevolution: Toward a general theory of vertical transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 11935–11938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracchia, J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1999). Does culture evolve? History and Theory, 38, 52–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabora, L. (2011). Five clarifications about cultural evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, Ellen. C., Goldizen, Anne. W., Rekdahl, Melinda. L., Constantine, R., Garrigue, C., Hauser, Nan. D., et al. (2011). Dynamic horizontal cultural transmission of humpback whale song at the ocean basin scale. Current Biology, 21, 687–691.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, R., Kluckhohn, C., & Rapoport, A. (1956). Biological and cultural evolution some analogies and explorations. Behavioral Science, 1(1), 6–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2006). Sylvia’s recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In S. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 229–255). Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2006). The emergence of a price system from decentralized bilateral exchange. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 6, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian populations and natural selection. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogarten, J. P., & Townsend, J. P. (2005). Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 3, 679–687.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J., & Greenhill, S. J. (2009). Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in pacific settlement. Science, 323, 479–483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., Kalish, M. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Theoretical and empirical evidence for the impact of inductive biases on cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3503–3514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmino, C. R., Viganotti, C., Hewlett, B. S., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1995). Cultural variation in Africa: Role of mechanisms of transmission and adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 7585–7589.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The causes of evolution. Green, London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2010). The evolution of cultural adaptations: Fijian food taboos protect against dangerous marine toxins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 277, 3715–3724.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. S., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1986). Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. American Anthropologist, 88(4), 922–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. S., De Silvestri, A., & Guglielmino, C. R. (2002). Semes and genes in Africa. Current Anthropology, 43, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (2000). Taking memetic seriously: Memetics will be what we make it. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2006). Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., Lamb, M. J., & Avital, E. (1998). ‘Lamarckian’mechanisms in darwinian evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 206–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R., Rivera, M. C., & Lake, J. A. (1999). Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: The complexity hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 3801–3806.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M. (1965). Newly acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese Monkeys on Koshima Islet. Primates, 6, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C., Stein, C., Webb, L., Billings, V. D., & Rozenblit, L. (2008). Discerning the division of cognitive labor: An emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other minds. Cognitive Science, 32, 259–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. (1956). Random genetic drift in a tri-allelic locus; exact solution with a continuous model. Biometrics, 12, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10681–10686.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 5241–5245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kronfeldner, M. (2007). Is cultural evolution Lamarckian? Biology and Philosophy, 22, 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutzen, M., Mann, J., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., Bejder, L., & Sherwin, W. B. (2005). Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8939–8943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, A. (2000). If memes are the answer, what is the question? In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behaviour Brain Science, 23, 131–145.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, G. W. (1985). Surnames and genetic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. S. (2001a). Boas, darwin, science, and anthropology. Current Anthropology, 42, 381–406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. S. (2001b). The passion of Franz Boas. American Anthropology, 103, 447–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1974). The genetic basis of evolutionary change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozada, M., Ladio, A., & Weigandt, M. (2006). Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge in a rural community of northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Economic Botany, 60, 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (2003). Cultural traits: Units of analysis in early twentieth-century anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 59, 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., & Holden, C. (2005). A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T. R. (1809). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrubia, S. C., & Zanette, D. H. (2002). At the boundary between biological and cultural evolution: The origin of surname distributions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 216, 461–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro, O., & Sperber, D. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112, 367–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1959). Typological versus population thinking. Evolution and anthropology:A centennial appraisal. Washington: The Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath, R., & Strimling, P. (2008). When natural selection favors imitation of parents. Current Anthropology, 49, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2004). Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of the Origin of Species. Evolution, 58, 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behaviour Brain Science, 29, 329–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzgar, D., & Wills, C. (2000). Evidence for the adaptive evolution of mutation rates. Cell, 101, 581–584.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Migliano, A. B., Vinicius, L., & Lahr, M. M. (2007). Life history trade-offs explain the evolution of human pygmies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20216–20219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, O. (2010). La transmission culturelle: Questions philosophiques et methodes quantitatives dans l’etude des traditions. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1967). Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics, 57, 625–641.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmagari, K., & Berkes, F. (1997). Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the western James Bay Cree women of Subarctic Canada. Human Ecology, 25, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature, 441, 502–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, S. P. (2009). The evolutionary enigma of sex. The American Naturalist, 174 Suppl 1, S1–S14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S., Baker, M., Fedigan, L., Grosa Louis, J., Jack, K., MacKinnon, Katherine. C., et al. (2003). Social conventions in wild white faced Capuchin monkeys: Evidence for traditions in a neotropical primate. Current Anthropology, 44, 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (2005). Culture does evolve. History and Theory, 44, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 411–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J. (2002). Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J., & Steele, J. (1999). Cultural learning in hominids: A behavioural ecological approach. In O. H. Box & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), Mammalian social learning: Comparative and ecological perspectives (pp. 367–388). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2008). Cultural evolution: Implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3591–3603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (2002). Conceptual tools for a natural science of society and culture. Proceedings of the British Academy, 111, 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Claidière, N. (2006). Why modeling cultural evolution is still such a challenge. Biological Theory, 1, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Claidière, N. (2008). Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, Not by genes alone). Biology and Philosophy, 23, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 40–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Takahasi, K. (1999). Theoretical aspects of the mode of transmission in cultural inheritance. Theoretical Population Biology, 55, 208–225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. D., & Jonker, L. B. (1978). Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani, J. J., & Collard, M. (2009). On the relationship between interindividual cultural transmission and population-level cultural diversity: A case study of weaving in Iranian tribal populations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 286.e282–300.e282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victoria, R.-G., James, B., Laura, C.-M., Nuria, F.-P., Thomas, W. M., Sorush, P., et al. (2009). Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge and skills: An empirical analysis from an Amerindian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 274–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R. (1905). My life: A record of events and opinions. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. W. (1997). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M., Ziman, J., & Boden, M. A. (2002). The evolution of cultural entities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1968). Evolution and the genetics of populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, N., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Skolnick, M., & Moroni, A. (1974). The evolution of surnames: An analysis of their distribution and extinction. Theoretical Population Biology, 5, 123–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zanette, D. H., & Manrubia, S. C. (2001). Vertical transmission of culture and the distribution of family names. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 295, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J. A., & Zeh, D. W. (2005). Maternal inheritance, sexual conflict and the maladapted male. Trends in Genetics, 21, 281–286.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Peter Godfrey-Smith, Hugo Mercier, Denis Roze, Eoin O’ Sullivan and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Claidière.

Additional information

Nicolas Claidière and Jean-Baptiste André contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claidière, N., André, JB. The Transmission of Genes and Culture: A Questionable Analogy. Evol Biol 39, 12–24 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-011-9141-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-011-9141-8

Keywords

Navigation