Skip to main content
Log in

The role of prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stenting in distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most frequent complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stenting (PTPS) has been proposed recently for the prevention of PF after DP. In this meta-analysis, a comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies analyzing the results of PTPS in DP were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. The analyzed outcome variables included PF rate, postoperative morbidity, non-PF-related complications, mortality, operation duration, and hospital stay. Four studies with 200 patients were included in this review. Only one was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The results showed that PTPS was associated with less PF formation (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.94; P = 0.03) and shorter hospital stay (mean difference, − 6.31; 95% CI, − 6.99 to − 5.62; P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in terms of the other variables. In conclusion, current evidence indicates that PTPS could reduce PF incidence and hospital stay after DP, without increasing other complications or operative time. However, the evidence is not solid, because the single RCT conflicted with the other three retrospective reports. Thus, considering the limitation, more well-designed RCTs on this topic are needed in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136(4): 391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 229(5): 693–698, discussion 698–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138(12): 1310–1314, discussion 1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 183(3): 237–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S, Pickleman J, Aranha GV. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002; 68(3): 264–267, discussion 267–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138(1): 8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng S, Liu Y, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C, Wu Y, Fang H, Shen H. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy: clinical report of 150 cases. Natl Med J China (Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi) 2002; 82(6): 368–370 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peng SY, Wang JW, Hong DF, Liu YB, Wang YF. Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy. Updates Surg 2011; 63(2): 69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, Tominaga M, Ku Y, Yamamoto YM, Kuroda Y. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg 1999; 86(5): 608–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H. Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg 1996; 83(12): 1711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, Nakamura S, Takeyoshi I, Ohya T, Ikeya T, Kawashima K, Kawashima Y, Morishita Y. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998; 22(5): 494–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Ingrosso M, Vamvakousis V, Alevras P, Manta R, Perri V. Endoscopic treatment of postsurgical external pancreatic fistulas. Endoscopy 2001; 33(4): 317–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goasguen N, Bourrier A, Ponsot P, Bastien L, Lesurtel M, Prat F, Dousset B, Sauvanet A. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and enucleation. Am J Surg 2009; 197(6): 715–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi Y, Yanagida O, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2006; 191(2):198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kanou H, Kuboi Y, Kida K, Amano S. Transduodenal pancreatic juice drainage for preventing pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2011; 58(105): 177–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rieder B, Krampulz D, Adolf J, Pfeiffer A. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy and stenting for preoperative prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72(3): 536–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frozanpor F, Lundell L, Segersvärd R, Arnelo U. The effect of prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stent insertion on clinically significant leak rate following distal pancreatectomy: results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2012; 255(6): 1032–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochranehandbook.org

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336(7650): 924–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Büchler MW, Weitz J. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011; 254(6): 882–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328(7454): 1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fischer CP, Bass B, Fahy B, Aloia T. Transampullary pancreatic duct stenting decreases pancreatic fistula rate following left pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55(81): 244–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F, Suc B, Fourtanier F. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 2005; 137(2): 180–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Holmières F, Sastre B, Fagniez PL; the French Associations for Surgical Research. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237(1): 57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saeed ZA, Ramirez FC, Hepps KS. Endoscopic stent placement for internal and external pancreatic fistulas. Gastroenterology 1993; 105 (4): 1213–1217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Renou C, Grandval P, Ville E, Laugier R. Endoscopic treatment of the main pancreatic duct: correlations among morphology, manometry, and clinical follow-up. Int J Pancreatol 2000; 27(2): 143–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sugiyama M, Abe N, Yamaguchi Y, Yamato T, Nakaura H, Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for safe local pancreatic resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48(42): 1625–1627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Konishi T, Hiraishi M, Kubota K, Bandai Y, Makuuchi M, Idezuki Y. Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 221(2): 165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Markar SR, Vyas S, Karthikesalingam A, Imber C, Malago M. The impact of pancreatic duct drainage following pancreaticojejunostomy on clinical outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16(8): 1610–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99(8): 1050–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirota M, Kanemitsu K, Takamori H, Chikamoto A, Ohkuma T, Komori H, Miyanari N, Ishiko T, Baba H. Local pancreatic resection with preoperative endoscopic transpapillary stenting. Am J Surg 2007; 194(3): 308–310, discussion 311–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith MT, Sherman S, Ikenberry SO, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Alterations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene pancreatic stent therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44(3): 268–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ikenberry SO, Sherman S, Hawes RH, Smith M, Lehman GA. The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40(5): 611–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Egger M, Smith GD. Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise. BMJ 1997; 315(7119): 1371–1374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309(6954): 597–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingbin Liu.

Additional information

Xiangsong Wu and Maolan Li have contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, X., Li, M., Wu, W. et al. The role of prophylactic transpapillary pancreatic stenting in distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Front. Med. 7, 499–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-013-0296-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-013-0296-9

Keywords

Navigation