Abstract
Suppose COVID-19 is the runaway tram in the famous moral thought experiment, known as the “Bystander at the Switch.” Consider the two differentiated responses of governments around the world to this new threat, namely the option of quarantine/lockdown and herd immunity. Can we contrast the hypothetical with the real scenario? What do the institutional decisions and strategies for dealing with the virus, in the beginning of 2020, signify in a normative moral framework? This paper investigates these possibilities in order to highlight the similarities and, more importantly, the differences that exist between utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. Analysis shows that the hypothetical scenario can never be fully compared to the complex multifactorial nature of the real world. But if a comparison is attempted, the most obvious difference between the two governmental strategies is the concept of duty within the Kantian perspective. Ultimately, it is a matter of comparing freedom and life. Attributing a moral “priority ticket” to one or the other can be analysed through interpersonal aggregation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable
References
Aguilera, J. 2020. No, you should not have or participate in a coronavirus party. Here’s what to know about herd immunity. Time, April 24. https://time.com/5825386/herd-immunity-coronavirus-covid-19/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Atkeson, A. 2020. What will be the economic impact of COVID-19 in the U.S.? Rough estimates of disease scenarios. NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26867. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Clemente-Suárez, V.J., A. Hormeño-Holgado, M. Jiménez, et al. 2020. Dynamics of population immunity due to the herd effect in the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines 8(2): 236.
Fernandes, N. 2020. Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. IESE Business School Working Paper No. WP-1240-E. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557504. Accessed November 13 2023.
Ferguson, N.M., D. Laydon, G. Nedjati-Gilani, et al. 2020. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-9-impact-of-npis-on-covid-19/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Foot, P. 1967. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review 5: 5–15.
Graham, P.A. 2017. Thomson’s trolley problem. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12(2): 168–190.
Johnson, R., and A. Cureton. 2022. Kant’s moral philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/kant-moral/>. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Korinek, A., and Z. Bethune. 2020. COVID-19 infection externalities: Herd immunity versus containment strategies. VOX CEPR Policy Portal, May 3. https://voxeu.org/article/covid-19-infection-externalities-herd-immunity-versus-containment-strategies. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Kwok, K.O., F. Lai, W.I. Wei, S.Y.S. Wong, and J.W.T. Tang. 2020. Herd immunity—Estimating the level required to halt the COVID-19 epidemics in affected countries. Journal of Infection 80(6): e32–e33.
Lintern, S. 2020. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, March 13. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-herd-immunity-uk-nhs-outbreak-pandemic-government-a9399101.html. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Mai, H.J. 2020. Swedish ambassador says Stockholm expected to reach “herd immunity” in May. National Public Radio, April 26. https://www.npr.org/2020/04/26/845211085/stockholm-expected-to-reach-herd-immunity-in-may-swedish-ambassador-says?t=1587982188991&t=1589323257194. Accessed November 13, 2023.
McIntyre, A. 2023. Doctrine of double effect. In The Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/double-effect/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Mill, J.S. 1859. On liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son.
Miller, A.M. 2020. WHO: Herd immunity is a long way off stopping COVID-19. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/herd-immunity-not-enough-to-stop-coronavirus/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Orlowski, E.J.W., and D.J.A. Goldsmith. 2020. Four months into the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden’s prized herd immunity is nowhere in sight. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 113(8): 292–298.
Qiu, J., B. Shen, M. Zhao, Z. Wang, B. Xie, and Y. Xu. 2020. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. General Psychiatry 33(2): e100213.
Scanlon, T.M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shi, L. 2020. Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing policies. CEPR Discussion Papers 14613. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/14613.html. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2023. Consequentialism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/consequentialism/>. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Statista. 2019. Median age of the global labor force from 1990 to 2025, by gender. International Labour Organization. https://www.statista.com/statistics/996549/median-age-global-labor-force-gender/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Stewart, H., and M. Busby. 2020. Coronavirus: science chief defends UK plan from criticism. The Guardian, March 20. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/13/coronavirus-science-chief-defends-uk-measures-criticism-herd-immunity. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Thomson, J.J. 1985. The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal 94(6): 1395–1415.
Vignesh R, E.M. Shankar, V. Velu, and S.P. Thyagarajan. 2020. Is herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2 a silver lining? Frontiers in Immunology 11: 586781.
World Health Organization. 2023. Global situation. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
World Health Organization. 2020. Considerations for quarantine of individuals in the context of containment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Interim guidance. Iris, March 19. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331497. Accessed November 13, 2023.
World Health Organization. 2016. International health regulations (2005), 3rd ed. https://www.who.int/ihr/publications/9789241580496/en/. Accessed November 13, 2023.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to the anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous drafts of the paper. Most of these remarks were incorporated in the text.
Funding
No funding was received
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors agreed with the manuscript’s content and all gave explicit consent to submit before the work is submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stelios, S., Konstantakis, K.N. & Michaelides, P.G. The “Bystander at the Switch” Revisited? Ethical Implications of the Government Strategies Against COVID-19. Bioethical Inquiry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10328-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10328-6