Skip to main content
Log in

Failure Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of Above Ground Oil–Gas Pipeline Impacted by Rockfall

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 July 2014

Abstract

Pipeline is the most important transmission way of oil and gas. Rockfall impact is one of the factors that result in above ground oil–gas pipelines accidents. Deformation of oil–gas pipeline caused by rockfall impacts were investigated using finite element method. Pipeline deformation caused by spherical and cube rockfalls were discussed under radial impact, inclined impact, and eccentric impact. The results show that crater depth of spherical rockfall impact is bigger than the cube rockfall with the same volume. The smaller curvature radius of rockfall’s contact zone has a greater harm to oil–gas pipeline. Angle part impact of irregular rockfall is very harmful for oil–gas pipeline. Under inclined impact, the maximum plastic strain of spherical rockfall impact crater appears when incidence angle α is 45°. Pipeline is prone to rupture when α is small under cube rockfall impact. The plastic strain distribution of the impact crater is more uneven with the increasing of the incidence angle. Plastic strain zone of pipeline decreases with the increasing of eccentricity k under eccentric impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Shuai, G.J. Yu, Strength Design of Pipeline and Storage Tank, 1st edn. (Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Xiong, Q.L. Deng, H.L. Zhang, Safety assessment on the response of buried pipeline caused by rockfall impact load. Saf. Environ. Eng. 20(1), 108–114 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. X.W. Shi, Q.L. Deng, G.L. Dong, The hazards of landslides and rockslides to pipeline. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 23(3), 295–299 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.L. Lu, P.X. Yao, H.Y. Liu, Simulation of controlled shot peening process based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA. Mach. Des. Manuf. 47(2), 214–216 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. X.Y. Lu, Dynamic Constitutive Relationship of TC4 Titanium Alloy. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010

  6. J.L. Yu, L. Qin, Rupture failure of an elbow subjected to internal impact. J. Vibr. Shock 29(10), 228–231 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.G. Zhang, W.J. Stronge, Rupture of thin ductile tubes by oblique impact of blunt missiles: experiments. Int. J. Impact Eng. 21(7), 571–578 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Liang, Z. & Han, C.J. Failure Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of Above Ground Oil–Gas Pipeline Impacted by Rockfall. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 14, 530–536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9847-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9847-x

Keywords

Navigation