Abstract
A general equation is derived for melting point depression (MPD) of pure metals, consisting of three terms: MPD due to high gas pressure, MPD due to high strain energy, and MPD due to small size of the metal. Particular equations are derived for different configurations of the solid metal, including grains embedded within a matrix. The equations obtained in this paper can be used to design nano-joining structures with improved MPD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.T. Bao, Y. Kim, J. Lee, and J.G. Lee, Preparation and Thermal Analysis of Sn-Ag Nano Solders, Mater. Trans., 2010, 51, p 2145–2149
C. Zou, Y. Gao, B. Yang, and Q. Zhai, Synthesis and DSC Study on Sn3.5Ag Alloy Nanoparticles Used for Lower Melting Temperature Solder, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 2010, 21, p 868–874
R. Longtin, E. Hack, J. Neuenschwander, and J. Janczak-Rusch, Benign Joining of Ultrafine Grained Aerospace Aluminum Alloys Using Nanotechnology, Adv. Mater., 2011, 20, p 1–5
G. Pigozzi, A. Antusek, J. Janczak-Rusch, M. Parlinska-Wojtan, D. Passerone, C.A. Pignedoli, V. Bissig, J. Patscheider, and L.P.H. Jeurgens, Phase Constitution and Interface Structure of Nano-sized Ag-Cu/AlN Multilayers: Experimental and Ab Initio Modeling, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 101, p 181602
P. Pawlow, Über die Abhängigkeit des Schmelzpunktes von der Oberflächenergie eines festen Körpers, Z. Phys. Chem., 1908, 55, p 545–548
M. Takagi, Electron-Diffraction Study of Liquid-Solid Transition of Thin Solid Films, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 1954, 9(3), p 359–363
J.F. Pocza, A. Barna, and P.B. Barna, Formation Processes of Vacuum-Deposited Indium Films and Thermodynamical Properties of Submicroscopic Particles Observed by In Situ Electron Microscopy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 1969, 6(4), p 472–475
C.J. Coombes, The Melting of Small Particles of Lead and Indium, J. Phys. F, 1972, 2, p 441–449
Ph Buffat and J.-P. Borel, Size Effect on the Melting Temperature of Gold Particles, Phys. Rev. A, 1976, 13, p 2287–2296
P.R. Couchman and W.A. Jesser, Thermodynamic Theory of Size Dependence of Melting Temperature in Metals, Nature, 1977, 269, p 481–483
F. Spaepen and D. Turnbull, Negative Pressures and Melting Point Depression in Oxide-Coated Liquid Metal Droplets, Scripta Metall., 1979, 13, p 149–151
G.L. Allen, W.W. Gile, and W.A. Jesser, The Melting Temperature of Microcrystals Embedded in a Matrix, Acta Metall., 1980, 28, p 1695–1701
R. Kofman, P. Cheyssac, A. Aouaj, Y. Lereah, G. Deuscher, T. Ben-David, J.M. Penisson, and A. Bourret, Surface Melting Enhanced by Curvature Effects, Surf. Sci., 1994, 303, p 231–246
K. Chattopadhyay and R. Goswami, Melting and Superheating of Metals and Alloys, Prog. Mater. Sci., 1997, 42, p 287–300
M. Wautelet, On the Shape Dependence of the Melting Temperature of Small Particles, Phys. Lett. A, 1998, 246, p 341–342
Z. Zhang, J.C. Li, and Q. Jiang, Modelling for Size-Dependent and Dimension-Dependent Melting of Nanocrystals, J. Phys. D, 2000, 33, p 2653–2656
Q. Jiang, Z. Zhang, and J.C. Li, Melting Thermodynamics of Nanocrystals Embedded in a Matrix, Acta Mater., 2000, 48, p 4791–4795
T. Tanaka and S. Hara, Thermodynamic Evaluation of Binary Phase Diagrams of Small Particle Systems, Z. Metallkd., 2001, 92, p 467–472
M. Hillert and J. Argen, Effect of Surface Free Energy and Surface Stress on Phase Equilibria, Acta Mater., 2002, 50, p 2429–2441
U. Tartaglino and E. Tosatti, Strain Effects at Solid Surfaces Near the Melting Point, Surf. Sci., 2003, 532–535, p 623–627
Q. Jiang, L.H. Liang, and J.C. Li, Thermodynamic Superheating of Low-Dimensional Metals Embedded in Matrix, Vacuum, 2003, 72, p 249–255
Z. Shi, P. Wynblatt, and S.G. Srinivasan, Melting Behavior of Nanosized Lead Particles Embedded in an Aluminium Matrix, Acta Mater., 2004, 52, p 2305–2316
V.M. Samsonov and O.A. Malkov, Thermodynamic Model of Crystallization and Melting of Small Particles, Cent. Eur. J. Phys., 2004, 2(1), p 90–103
Q.S. Mei, S.C. Wang, H.T. Cong, Z.H. Jin, and K. Lu, Determination of Pressure Effect on the Melting Point Elevation of Al Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Al2O3 without epitaxial interface, Phys. Rev. B, 2004, 70, p 125421
J. Chang and E. Johnson, Surface and Bulk Melting of Small Metal Clusters, Philos. Mag., 2005, 85(30), p 3617–3627
J. Slutsker, K. Thornton, A.L. Roytburd, J.A. Warren, and G.B. McFadden, Phase Field Modeling of Solidification Under Stress, Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 74(1), p 014103
J.J. Hoyt, Effect of Stress on Melting and Freezing in Nanopores, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96(4), p 045702
G. Guisbiers and M. Wautelet, Size, Shape and Stress Effects on the Melting Temperature of Nano-polyhedral Grains on a Substrate, Nanotechnology, 2006, 17, p 2008–2011
J. Sun and S.L. Simon, The Melting Behavior of Aluminum Nanoparticles, Thermochim. Acta, 2007, 463, p 32–40
G. Guisbiers, O. Van Overschelde, and M. Wautelet, Nanoparticulate Origin of Intrinsic Residual Stress in Thin Films, Acta Mater., 2007, 55, p 3541–3546
O.A. Yeshchenko, I.M. Dmitruk, A.A. Alexeenko, and A.M. Dmytruk, Size-Dependent Melting of Spherical Copper Nanoparticles Embedded in a Silica Matrix, Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 75(8), p 085434
P. Letellier, A. Mayaffre, and M. Turmine, Melting Point Depression of Nanosolids: Nonextensive Thermodynamics Approach, Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 76, p 045428
Q.S. Mei and K. Lu, Melting and Superheating of Crystalline Solids: From Bulk to Nanocrystals, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2007, 52, p 1175–1262
J. Lee, T. Tanaka, J. Lee, and H. Mori, Effect of Substrates on the Melting Temperature of Gold Nanoparticles, Calphad, 2007, 31, p 105–111
K.K. Nanda, Size-Dependent Melting of Nanoparticles: Hundred Years of Thermodynamic Model, Pramana J. Phys., 2009, 172, p 617–628
V.I. Levitas, M. Pantoya, G. Chauhan, and I.J. Rivero, Effect of the Alumina Shell on the Melting Temperature Depression for Aluminum Nanoparticles, Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113(32), p 14088–14096
G. Kaptay, The Extension of the Phase Rule to Nano-systems and on the Quaternary Point in One-Component Nano Phase Diagrams, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2010, 10, p 8164–8170
W. Luo, L. Deng, K. Su, K. Li, G. Liao, and S. Xiao, Gibbs Free Energy Approach to Calculate the Thermodynamic Properties of Copper Nanocrystals, Phys. B, 2011, 406, p 859–863
V.I. Levitas and K. Samani, Size and Mechanics Effects in Surface-Induced Melting of Nanoparticles, Nat. Commun., 2011, 2, p 284
V.I. Levitas and K. Samani, Coherent Solid/Liquid Interface with Stress Relaxation in a Phase-Field Approach to the Melting/Solidification Transition, Phys. Rev. B, 2011, 84(14), p 140103
G. Garzel, J. Janczak-Rusch, and L. Zabdyr, Reassessment of the Ag-Cu Phase Diagram for Nanosystems Including Particle Size and Shape Effect, Calphad, 2012, 36, p 52–56
G. Kaptay, The Gibbs Equation Versus the Kelvin and the Gibbs-Thomson Equations to Describe Nucleation and Equilibrium of Nano-materials, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2012, 12(3), p 2625–2633
A.I. Rusanov, The Development of the Fundamental Concepts of Surface Thermodynamics, Colloid J., 2012, 74(2), p 136–153
G. Kaptay, Nano-Calphad: Extension of the Calphad Method to Systems with Nano-phases and Complexions, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47, p 8320–8335
V.I. Levitas, Z. Ren, Y. Zeng, Z. Zhang, and G. Han, Effect of the Alumina Shell on the Melting Temperature Depression for Aluminum Nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B, 2012, 85(22), p 220104
J. Leitner and M. Kamrádek, Termodynamicky popis nanosystemu, Chem. Listy, 2013, 107, p 606–613
J. Lee and K.J. Sim, General Equations of CALPHAD-Type Thermodynamic Description for Metallic Nanoparticle Systems, Calphad, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.008
D.A. Firmansyah, K. Sullivan, K.S. Lee, Y.H. Kim, R. Zahaf, M.R. Zachariah, and D.J. Lee, Microstructural Behavior of the Alumina Shell and Aluminum Core Before and After Melting of Aluminum Nanoparticles, Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 116(1), p 404–411
L. Wojtczak, The Melting Point of Thin Films, Phys. Status Solidi, 1967, 22, p K163–K166
L.P.H. Jeurgens, Z. Wang, and E.J. Mittemeijer, Thermodynamics of Reactions and Phase Transformations at Interfaces and Surfaces, Int. J. Mater. Res., 2009, 100, p 1281–1307
D.G. Gromov and S.A. Gavrilov, Manifestation of the Heterogeneous Mechanism Upon Melting of Low-Dimensional Systems, Phys. Solid State, 2009, 51(10), p 2135–2144
R.C. Tolman, The Effect of Droplet Size on Surface Tension, J. Chem. Phys., 1949, 17, p 333–337
M.W. Chase (Ed.), Janaf, Thermochemical Tables, 3rd ed., J. Phys. Chem. Data, 1985, 14(Suppl 1)
J. Emsley, The Elements, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989
Y.S. Touloukian, R.K. Kirby, R.E. Taylor, and T.Y.R. Lee, Thermal Expansion, IFI/Plenum, New York, 1977
T. Iida and R.I.L. Guthrie, The Physical Properties of Liquid Metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993
G. Kaptay, A Unified Model for the Cohesive Enthalpy, Critical Temperature, Surface Tension and Volume Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Liquid Metals of bcc, fcc and hcp Crystals, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 495, p 19–26
I. Barin, Thermochemical Properties of Pure Substances, vols 1, 2, VCH, Weinheim, 1993
H.M. Ledbetter and E.R. Naimon, Elastic Properties of Metals and Alloys. II. Copper, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1974, 3(4), p 897–934
D. Gerlich, S.L. Dole, and G.A. Slack, Elastic Properties of Aluminum Nitride, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1986, 47(5), p 437–441
N. Eustathopoulos, M.G. Nicholas, and B. Drevet, Wettability at High Temperatures, Pergamon, Amsterdam, 1999
G. Kaptay, E. Báder, and L. Bolyán, Interfacial Forces and Energies Relevant to Production of Metal Matrix Composites, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, 329–330, p 151–156
Acknowledgments
The financial support from COSTMP0903 Action and SBFI Nr. C11.0055 project is greatly acknowledged. The results of the corresponding author presented in this paper are achieved within the TÁMOP-4.2.1.B-10/2/KONV-2010-0001 project and carried out as part of the TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0019 project in the framework of the New Széchenyi Plan and was supported by the European Union, and co-financed by the European Social Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Physical Properties for the Cu/AlN System
The standard melting point of Cu is T om = 1358.0 ± 0.2 K (Ref 53). The standard molar melting entropy is Δm S omol = 9.7 ± 0.3 J/mol K (Ref 53). The molar volume (m3/mol) of solid copper is written by the equation (Ref 54, 55)
The molar volume of solid Cu at 298 K and at its standard melting point is (7.10 ± 0.07) 10−6 and (7.57 ± 0.08) 10−6 m3/mol, respectively. The bulk packing fraction of the fcc crystal is 0.74. From here, the standard atomic radius of Cu is r a = 0.128 nm. The linear heat expansion coefficient (1/K) of the solid Cu follows from Eq A1 as
The linear heat expansion coefficient of solid Cu at 298 K and at its standard melting point is (1.51 ± 0.03) 10−5 and (2.52 ± 0.05) 10−5 1/K, respectively, the average value is (2.0 ± 0.5) 10−5 1/K. The molar volume (m3/mol) of liquid copper is written by the equation (Ref 54-56)
The molar volume of liquid Cu at 298 K and at its standard melting point is (7.24 ± 0.14) 10−6 and (7.94 ± 0.16) 10−6 m3/mol, respectively. The linear heat expansion coefficient (1/K) of liquid Cu follows from Eq A3 as
The linear heat expansion coefficient of liquid Cu at 298 K and at its standard melting point is (2.38 ± 0.05) 10−5 and (3.35 ± 0.07) 10−5 1/K, respectively, the average value is (2.9 ± 0.5) 10−5 1/K. The average molar volume (m3/mol) of the solid and liquid phases is
The molar volume change upon melting (m3/mol) is obtained as the difference between Eq A3 and A1, while the relative molar volume change upon melting is the latter divided by the molar volume of the solid
The molar volume change upon melting at 298 K and at its standard melting point approximately equals 1.48 × 10−7 m3/mol (2.08%) and 3.71 × 10−7 m3/mol (4.90%), respectively.
The standard entropy of melting of Cu per unit volume at standard melting point of 1358 K is the ratio of Δm S omol = 9.7 ± 0.3 J/mol K and the average molar volume of V o = (7.76 ± 0.12) 10−6 m3/mol: Δm S o = (1.25 ± 0.06) 106 J/m3K.
The standard surface tension and surface energy of copper (Ref 56, 57) (J/m2)
The bulk modulus of liquid copper at its melting point is the inverse of its bulk compressibility and it is estimated as K l = 100 GPa (Ref 56). It probably decreases linearly with the decrease of the cohesion energy in the liquid. The standard cohesion energy of liquid Cu at its melting point is about (Ref 57)
where R = 8.3145 J/mol K, the universal gas constant. Substituting T om = 1358.0 K into Eq A10: H oCu,l,m = −263 kJ/mol. The heat capacity of liquid Cu is about 32.8 J/mol K, and is not T-dependent (Ref 58). Thus, the T-coefficient of the cohesion energy change is the ratio of these two values: 1.25 × 10−4 1/K. The final T-dependence of the bulk modulus of liquid Cu is
The T-dependence of solid copper is approximately written as (Ref 59)
The Young modulus and Poisson ratio of AlN at 298 K are E m = 308 GPa and νm = 0.25 (Ref 60). Thus, the shear modulus from Eq 31: μm = 120 GPa at 298 K. Its T-dependence scales with the melting point, so in comparison to solid Cu of Eq A12 its T-coefficient is lower by about a coefficient of 2.4
The average linear expansion coefficient of AlN is αm = 5.27 × 10−6 1/K (Ref 60) between 20 and 800°C. No temperature dependence is taken into account.
Calculations will be performed for T o = 298 K. So, the two integrals of Eq 32 are described approximately as
The liquid/matrix interfacial energy is defined as (Ref 61)
where W ol/m (J/m2) is the adhesion energy at the liquid Cu/AlN matrix interface. At the melting point of Cu: σ ol/g = 1.30 J/m2 (see Eq A8). Surface energy of AlN is about σ om/g = 2.53 J/m2 at 1273 K (Ref 62). The contact angle of liquid Cu on AlN, as covalent and non-reactive ceramic is about 150° (Ref 61). Thus, from the Young-Dupré equation the adhesion energy at the melting point of Cu is about W ol/m = 0.17 J/m2. In the first approximation, this value is T-independent. Thus, at the melting point of Cu: σ ol/m = 3.66 J/m2. Its T-dependence is approximately
Solid Cu is not coherent with AlN. Thus, its adhesion energy is similar to that of the liquid Cu: W os/m = 0.17 J/m2. Then, the solid/matrix interfacial energy approximately equals
Appendix 2: The Derivation of a General Equation for the Strain Energy Density
When an elastic body is deformed, work W is done (J). This work, stored in the body is the strain energy. When this strain energy is divided by the volume V of the body (m3), the strain energy density E is obtained (J/m3 = N/m2 = Pa).
In the simplest case, let us apply a tensile force F (N) to a cylindrical body of initial length L (m) and of cross-sectional area A (m2). As a result, the body will be elongated (deformed) by x (m), what is called the absolute strain. The relative strain (called simply strain) is the ratio of the absolute elongation and the initial length: ɛ ≡ x/L (ɛ is dimensionless). As a result, the work done and stored within the body as strain energy is W = 0.5Fx (J). The stress in the body (σ, Pa) is the tensile force per unit cross-sectional area: σ ≡ F/A. Now, let us express x from ɛ ≡ x/L and F from σ ≡ F/A and substitute into the equation of the strain energy: W = 0.5Fx = 0.5σAɛL. Remember, that AL = V (the volume of the body) and E ≡ W/V. Then, from the above
When tensile changes are small, strain is proportional to stress: ɛ ≅ σ/E Y, where E Y (Pa) is the modulus of elasticity, or the Young modulus. Expressing from here σ as function of ɛ (or vice versa) we can obtain two versions for the equations of the strain energy density
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaptay, G., Janczak-Rusch, J., Pigozzi, G. et al. Theoretical Analysis of Melting Point Depression of Pure Metals in Different Initial Configurations. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 23, 1600–1607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0885-z
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0885-z