Skip to main content
Log in

High-strength steel development for pipelines: A brazilian perspective

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The production of American Petroleum Institute (API) class steels using the traditional controlled rolling route rather than the process involving accelerated cooling necessitates a careful adjustment of steel composition associated with the optimization of the rolling schedule for the deformation and phase transformation characteristics of these modified alloys. The current work presents a study of two, NbCr and NbCrMo, steel systems. The microstructure obtained is correlated not only with the resulting mechanical properties, but also with the weldability and resistance to damage in the aggressive environments to which the materials are exposed. The evaluation of the steels was undertaken at two stages along the production route, sampling the material as plate and as tubular product, according to the API 5L 2000 standard. Tensile testing, Charpy-V impact testing, and hardness measurements were used to determine the mechanical properties, and microstructural characterization was performed by optical and scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that it was possible to obtain good impact properties, for both steels, in plate and tube formats. The Charpy-V impact energy, measured at −20 °C from 100 to 250 J corresponds to a toughness level above that required by the API 5L 2000 standard, which specifies 68 to 101 J at 0 °C. The yield strength (YS) to ultimate tensile strength (UTS) ratio was determined to be 0.8, the API standard establishing a maximum limit of 0.93. Both of the alloys investigated exhibited a bainitic microstructure and were successfully processed to fabricate tubular products by the “UOE” (bending in “U”, closing in “O,” and expanding “E”) route. with regard to weldability, the two experimental steels exhibited a heat-affected zone (HAZ) for which toughness levels (using the temperature associated with a 100 J impact energy as a base for comparison) were higher than those for both the base metal (BM) and the weld metal (WM) itself. In order to perform the evaluation of the behavior of the steels in an aggressive environment, more specifically their resistance to the deleterious effects of H2S, slow strain rate tests (SSRTs) were carried out, immersing the samples in a sodium thiosulfate solution during the tests. Though no secondary cracking was observed in the test samples, the ductility levels measured were lower than those for the same materials tested in air. Constant load tests were also conducted according to the standard NACE conditions. Despite the more aggressive nature of the test solution in these cases, no samples of either steel suffered failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.M. Gray and W.J. Fazakerley: 37th Annual Conf. of Metallurgists, Calgary, AB, Canada, 1998, August 16–19, CIM, Canada, 1998, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Ouchi: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 2001, vol. 41 (6), pp. 542–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Nagae, S. Endo, N. Mifune, N. Uchitomi, and O. Hirano: NKK Rev., 1992, vol. 66, pp. 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Hulka: Niobium Information, CBMM/NPC, 1997, No. 13/97, pp. 1–42.

  5. I. Hrivnak, F. Matsuda, and K. Ikeuchi: Trans. JWRI, 1992, vol. 21, pp. 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Li, D.N Crowther, M.J.W. Green, P.S. Mitchell, and T.N. Baker: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 2001, vol. 41 (1), pp. 46–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. P.R. Rios and R.W.K. Honeycombe: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1990, vol. 6, pp. 838–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P.A. Manohar and T. Chandra: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 1998, vol. 38, pp. 766–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.P. Fairchild: Proc. Int. Symp. on Welding Metallurgy of Structural Steels, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 303–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Thaulow, A.J. Paauw, and K. Guttormsen: Welding J., 1987, vol. 59, pp. 266s-279s.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.P. Fairchild, N.V. Bangaru, J.Y. Koo, P.L. Harrison, and A. Ozekcin: Welding J., 1991, vol. 70, pp. 321s-329s.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.L. Davis and J.E. King: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1993, vol. 9, pp. 8–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P.S.A. Bezerra: Master’s Thesis, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1998 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. NACE International: NACE Standard TM0177/96, Standard Test Method, NACE, Houston, TX, revised Dec. 1996.

  15. G.Z. Batista, L.F.G. de Souza, Ivani de S. Bott, and P.R. Rios: Proc. Int. Conf. on Thermomechanical Processing: Mechanics, Microstructure & Control, E.J. Palmiere, M. Mahfouf, and C. Pina, eds., University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, 2003, pp. 240–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Specification for Line Pipe, API Specification 5L, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2000.

  17. K.R.S. Lima: Master’s Thesis, University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2002 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivani de S. Bott: Int. Conf. on Processing and Manufacturing of Advanced Materials THERMEC ’2003, T. Chandra, J.M. Torralba, and T. Sakai, eds., part 2, Trans. Tech. Publications Ltd., Switzerland, 2003, vols. 426–432, pp. 1463–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.B. Pickering: Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, Materials Science Series, Applied Science Publishers, London, 1978, pp. 60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Ito and K. Bessyo: J. Jpn. Welding Soc., 1968, vol. 37 (9), pp. 983–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Dixon and K. Hakansson: Welding J., 1995, vol. 74, pp. 122s-132s.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.L.L.T. Small: Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1996 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.M. Sage: Proc. Conf. Steels for Line Pipe and Pipeline Fittings, The Metals Society, 1981, pp. 39–50.

  24. B.L. Jones: ASM Int. Conf. on Technology and Applications of HSLA Steels, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1984, pp. 715–22.

  25. T.W. Montemarano, B.P. Sack, J.P. Gudas, M.G. Vassilaros, and H.H. Vanderveldt: J. Ship Production, 1986, vol. 2, pp. 145–62.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Matsuda, Y. Fukada, H. Okada, C. Shiga, K. Ikeuchi, Y. Horii, T. Shiwaka, and S. Suzuki: Welding World, 1996, vol. 37, pp. 134–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Kawabata, M. Okatsu, K. Amano, and Y. Nakano: Pipeline Technol., 1995, vol. 2, pp. 263–71.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Ikawa, H. Oshige, and T. Tanoue: IIW DOC IX-1156-80, International Institute of Welding, London, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S.K. Dhua, D. Mukerjee, and D.S. Sarma: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 290–98 and 42–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M.C. Zhao, B. Tang, Y.Y. Shan, and K. Yang: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2003, vol. 34A, pp. 1089–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Albiter, A. Contreras, M. Salazar, and R. Perez: Proc. 7th Int. Congr. of Pipelines, Puebla, Mexico, 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bott, I.d.S., De Souza, L.F.G., Teixeira, J.C.G. et al. High-strength steel development for pipelines: A brazilian perspective. Metall Mater Trans A 36, 443–454 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0315-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0315-9

Keywords

Navigation