Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laser-induced shock compression of copper: Orientation and pressure decay effects

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pure copper monocrystals with [001] and [\(\bar 1\)34] orientations were subjected to ultrashort shock pulses ranging in initial duration from 2.5 to 10 ns, induced by a laser at energies ranging from 10 to 70 MJ/m2. The deformation structure was significantly dependent on the crystallographic orientation and depth from the laser-impacted surface, as characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The threshold pressure for twinning in the [001] direction was observed to be in the range of 20 to 40 GPa compared with 40 to 60 GPa for the [\(\bar 1\)34] orientation. Dislocation densities were also different for the two orientations, under similar shock conditions. The [\(\bar 1\)34] dislocation density was systematically lower. This is attributed to the activation of fewer slip systems resulting in a lower rate of hardening. The different results found for [001] and [\(\bar 1\)34] copper single crystals are described and effects of pressure decay in [\(\bar 1\)34] specimens are discussed. Differences in the mechanical response between the two orientations are responsible for differences in the shear stress in the specimens at the imposed pressures and associated strains. The [\(\bar 1\)34] orientation is initially subjected to deformation by single slip, (111)[101], which has a Schmid factor of 0.4711 and a well-defined easy glide region followed by a cross-slip regime with secondary slip. The [001] orientation has eight slip systems {111}〈110〉 with identical Schmid factors of 0.4082, which lead to immediate work hardening. At an imposed and prescribed pressure (that establishes the strain), the [\(\bar 1\)34] orientation exhibits a lower shear stress. The orientation dependence of the twinning stress is much lower, as expressed by Schmidt factors. This higher stress for [001] predisposes the onset of twinning in this orientation. The results are interpreted in terms of a criterion in which slip and twinning are considered as competing mechanisms. A constitutive description using a modified mechanical threshold stress (MTS) model is applied to the two orientations, incorporating both slip and twinning. The threshold pressure for twinning is calculated, considering the effect of shock heating. The constitutive description provides a rationale for the experimental results: the calculated thresholds are 17 GPa for [001] and 25 GPa for [\(\bar 1\)34].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.S. Smith: Trans. AIME, 1958, vol. 212, pp. 574–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Q. Johnson, A. Mitchell, R.N. Keeler, and L. Evans: Phys. Rev. Lett., 1970, vol. 25, pp. 1109–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Zaretsky: J. Appl. Phys., 1995, vol. 78, pp. 3740–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Wark, R.R. Whitlock, A.A. Hauer, J.E. Swain, and P.J. Solone: Phys. Rev. B, 1989, vol. 40, pp. 5705–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Meyers, F. Gregori, B.K. Kad, M.S. Schneider, D.H. Kalantar, B.A. Remington, J.S. Wark, T. Boehly, and G. Ravichandran: in Shock Compression of Condensed Matter—2001, M.D. Furnish, N.N. Thadhani, and Y. Horie, eds., AIP, New York, NY, 2002, pp. 619–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Meyers, F. Gregori, B.K. Kad, M.S. Schneider, D.H. Kalantar, B.A. Remington, G. Ravichandran, and T. Boehly: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 1211–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Johari and G. Thomas: Acta Metal., 1964, vol. 12, pp. 1153–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L.E. Murr: in Shock Waves and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Metals, M.A. Meyers and L.E. Murr, eds., Plenum, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 607–73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.I. Grace: J. Appl. Phys., 1969, vol. 40, pp. 2649–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G.T. Gray III: in Shock-Wave and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Materials, M.A. Meyers, L.E. Murr, and K.P. Staudhammer, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1992, pp. 899–902.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Hornbogen: Acta Metal., 1962, vol. 10, pp. 978–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Meyers: Scripta Metall., 1978, vol. 12, pp. 21–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Weertman: in Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena in Metals, M.A. Meyers and L.E. Murr, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 469–86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Mogilevskii: Phys. Rep., 1983, vol. 97, pp. 359–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.J. De Angelis and J.B. Cohen: J. Met., 1963, vol. 15, pp. 681–87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.H. Kalantar, J. Belak, E. Bringa, K. Budil, M. Caturla, J. Colvin, M. Kumar, K.T. Lorenz, R.E. Rudd, J. Stolken, A.M. Allen, K. Rosolankova, J.S. Wark, M.A. Meyers, and M.S. Schneider: Phys. Plasmas, 2003, vol. 5, pp. 1569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Lindl: Phys. Plasmas, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 3933–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R.L. Nolder and G. Thomas: Acta Metall., 1963, vol. 11, pp. 994–1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R.L. Nolder and G. Thomas: Acta Metall., 1964, vol. 12, pp. 227–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Diehl: Z. Metallkd., 1956, vol. 47, pp. 331–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. L.E. Murr, M.A. Meyers, C.-S. Niou, Y.-J. Chen, S. Pappu, and C. Kennedy: Acta Mater., 1997, vol. 45, pp. 157–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M.A. Meyers, D.J. Benson, O. Voehringer, B.K. Kad, Q. Xue, and H.-H. Fu: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002, vol. A322, pp. 194–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. L.E. Murr: in Shock Waves in Condensed Matter, S.C. Schmid and N.C. Holmes, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 315–20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.W. Swegle and D.E. Grady: J. Appl. Phys., 1985, vol. 58, pp. 692–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M.A. Meyers: Dynamic Behavior of Materials, John Wiley, New York, NY, 1994, p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.S. Follansbee and G.T. Gray III: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. 138, pp. 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P.S. Follansbee: in Metallurgical Applications of Shock-Wave and High-Strain Rate Phenomena, L.E. Murr, K.P. Staudhammer, and M.A. Meyers, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1986, pp. 451–79.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.A. Meyers, O. Voehringer, and V.A. Lubarda: Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 4025–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a presentation given in the symposium “Dynamic Deformation: Constitutive Modeling, Grain Size, and Other Effects: In Honor of Prof. Ronald W. Armstrong,” March 2–6, 2003, at the 2003 TMS/ASM Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, under the auspices of the TMS/ASM Joint Mechanical Behavior of Materials Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, M.S., Kad, B.K., Meyers, M.A. et al. Laser-induced shock compression of copper: Orientation and pressure decay effects. Metall Mater Trans A 35, 2633–2646 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0209-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0209-2

Keywords

Navigation