Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does (mis)use of industrial liquid silicone implants interfere with bone mineral density in transgender women?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The effects of gluteal implants on bone mass remain unclear. Transgender women with ILS presented higher BMD in the hip compared with transgender women without implants, while no difference was observed in other sites. These results may be artifactual and suggest using spine/forearm sites for DXA in individuals with ILS.

Purpose

The inappropriate use of industrial liquid silicone (ILS) injections for cosmetic purposes is practiced by some transgender women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gluteal ILS on femur BMD in transgender women.

Methods

A total of 46 trans women with and without ILS injection in the gluteal region were selected. All patients underwent clinical and hormonal evaluation, and bone mass was assessed by DXA.

Results

Bone mineral density (BMD) values were significantly higher in trans women with ILS (n = 23) in femoral neck and total femur when compared with trans women without implants (n = 23). Similar BMD was observed in other sites, such as lumbar spine and forearm. Good agreement was found in the evaluation of low BMD using spine/forearm or spine/femur in patients without implants (k = 0.744 and 1.000 for male and female reference database, respectively), but poor to fair index was found in patients with ILS implants (k = 0.330 and 0.646 for male and female reference database, respectively).

Conclusions

In transgender women with ILS implants, poor to moderate agreement was found on BMD when comparing lumbar spine/femur DXA with an alternative site to the femur, depending on using male or female database. These results may be artifactual and suggest using spine/forearm sites for more accurate DXA assessments in trans women with ILS gluteal implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

References

  1. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Avalilable at: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f411470068. Accessed March 03, 2020.

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013) Fifth Edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, Hannema SE, Meyer WJ, Murad MH, Rosenthal SM, Safer JD, Tangpricha V, T’Sjoen GG (2017) Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an endocrine society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102(11):3869–3903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nobili A, Glazebrook C, Arcelus J (2018) Quality of life of treatment-seeking transgender adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 19(3):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauache OM, Vieira JG, Alonso G, Martins LR, Brandão C (2000) Increased hip bone mineral density in a woman with gluteal silicon implant. J Clin Densitom 3(4):391–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rivera M, Humeres P, González P (1999) Increased bone mineral density in dual x-ray densitometry due to gluteal implants. Clin Nucl Med 24(1):51–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassan A, Grady E, Ringelstein J, Halama JR, Mazhari A, Friedman NC (2012) Effect of silicone gluteal implant on bone mineral density evaluation by DXA scan. J Clin Densitom 15(1):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Favinger JL, Chesnut CH, Chew FS (2017) Asymmetric bone mineral density in the bilateral femoral necks due to gluteal implants: a case report. Radiol Case Rep 12(2):361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 2019 ISCD Official Positions. Avalilable at: https://www.iscd.org/official-positions/2019-iscd-official-positions-adult/ Accessed March 03, 2020.

  10. Senderoff DM (2016) Aesthetic surgery of the buttocks using implants: pactice based-recommendations. Aesthet Surg J 36(5):559–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manafi A, Emami AH, Pooli AH, Habibi M, Saidian L (2010) Unacceptable results with an accepted soft tissue filler: polyacrylamide hydrogel. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinto TP, Teixeira FDB, Barros CRDS, Martins RB, Saggese GSR, Barros DD, Veras MASM (2017) Use of industrial liquid silicone to transform the body: prevalence and factors associated with its use among transvestites and transsexual women in São Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 33(7):e00113316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nasseri E (2016) Gluteal augmentation with liquid silicone of unknown purity causes granulomas in an adult female: case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Med Surg 20(1):72–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salles AG, Lotierzo PH, Gemperli R, Besteiro JM, Ishida LC, Gimenez RP, Menezes J, Ferreira MC (2008) Complications after polymethylmethacrylate injections: report of 32 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1811–1820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Negri AL, Rosa Diez G, Del Valle E, Piulats E, Greloni G, Quevedo A (2014) Hypercalcemia secondary to granulomatous disease caused by the injection of methacrylate: a case series. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 11(1):44–48

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards BJ, Saraykar S, Sun M, Murphy WA Jr, Lin P, Gagel R (2015) Resection of granulomatous tissue resolves silicone induced hypercalcemia. Bone Rep 5:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tachamo N, Donato A, Timilsina B, Nazir S, Lohani S, Dhital R, Basnet S (2018) Hypercalcemia associated with cosmetic injections: a systematic review. Eur J Endocrinol 178(4):425–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Castellano E, Attanasio R, Gianotti L, Cesario F, Tassone F, Borretta G (2016) Forearm DXA increases the rate of patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism meeting surgical criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(7):2728–2732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker MD, Williams J, Lewis SK, Bai JC, Lebwohl B, Green PHR (2019) Measurement of forearm bone density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry increases the prevalence of osteoporosis in men with celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol S1542-3565(19):30370–30372

    Google Scholar 

  20. Almeida M, Laurent MR, Dubois V, Claessens F, O’Brien CA, Bouillon R et al (2017) Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophisiology. Physiol Rev 97(1):135–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T’Sjoen G, Weyers S, Taes Y, Lapauw B, Toye K, Goemaere S et al (2009) Prevalence of low bone mass in relation to estrogen treatment and body composition in male to female transsexual persons. J Clin Densitom 12:306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wierckx K, Mueller S, Weyers S, Van Caenegem E, Roef G, Heylens G et al (2012) Long-term evaluation of cross-sex hormone treatment in transsexual persons. J Sex Med 9(10):2641–2651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lapauw B, Taes Y, Simoens S, Van Caenegem E, Weyers S, Goemaere S et al (2008) Body composition, volumetric and areal bone parameters in male-to-female transsexual persons. Bone. 43(6):1016–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fighera TM, Silva E, Lindenau JD, Spritzer PM (2018) Impact of cross-sex hormone therapy on bone mineral density and body composition in transwomen. Clin Endocrinol 88(6):856–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fighera TM, Ziegelmann PK, Rasia da Silva T, Spritzer PM (2019) Bone mass effects of cross-sex hormone therapy in transgender people: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocr Soc 3(5):943–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiepjes CM, de Jongh RT, de Blok CJ, Vlot MC, Lips P, Twisk JW et al (2019) Bone safety during the first ten years of gender-affirming hormonal treatment in transwomen and transmen. J Bone Miner Res 34(3):447–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Webb AR, Kline L, Holick MF (1988) Influence of season and latitude on the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3 – exposure to winter sunlight in Boston and Edmonton will not promote vitamin D3 synthesis in human skin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian National Institute of Hormones and Women’s Health/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq INCT grant number 465482/2014-7), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS INCT grant number 17/2551-0000519-8). Financial support was also provided by FIPE-HCPA (Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Research and Event Support Fund). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poli Mara Spritzer.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fighera, T.M., da Silva, E.D., Borba, G. et al. Does (mis)use of industrial liquid silicone implants interfere with bone mineral density in transgender women?. Arch Osteoporos 15, 149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00824-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00824-2

Keywords

Navigation