Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glucocorticoids predict 10-year fragility fracture risk in a population-based ambulatory cohort of men and women: Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We determined the prospective 10-year association among incident fragility fractures and four glucocorticoid (GC) treatment groups (Never GC, Prior GC, Baseline GC, and Ever GC). Results showed that GC treatment is associated with increased 10-year incident fracture risk in ambulatory men and women across Canada.

Purpose

Using the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study dataset, we determined the prospective 10-year association between incident fragility fractures and GC treatment.

Methods

We conducted a 10-year prospective observational cohort study at nine sites across Canada. A total of 9,263 ambulatory men and women 25 years of age and older were included in the analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to determine the relationship among GC treatment groups in four levels that included Never GC, Prior GC, Baseline GC, and Ever GC (combined baseline and prior groups) and time to fracture.

Results

In each of the Never GC, Prior GC, Baseline GC, and Ever GC treatment groups, the number of participants were 8,832 (95.4 %), 303 (3.3 %), 128 (1.4 %), and 431 (4.7 %), respectively. Of the 9,263 individuals enrolled, incident fragility non-spine, hip, spine, and any fractures were experienced by a total of 896 (9.67 %), 157 (1.69 %), 130 (1.40 %), and 1,102 (11.90 %) over 10-years, respectively. For men and women combined, prior GC treatment was associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) for time to incident non-vertebral (HR = 1.5, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 2.0), hip (HR = 2.1, 95 % CI = 1.1, 4.0), and any fracture (HR = 1.4, 95 % CI = 1.0, 1.8) compared with never GC treatment.

Conclusions

GC treatment is associated with increased 10-year incident fracture risk; this highlights the importance of considering therapy to prevent GC-induced fractures for patients who are using GC for various medical conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Staa TP, Leufkens HGM, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fracture. J Bone Miner Res 15:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chavassieux P, Pastoureau P, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1993) Glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation in ewes: a biochemical and histomorphometric study. Osteoporos int 2:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbarino A, DeMarinis L, Folli G, Tofani A, Della Casa S, D’Amico C et al (1989) Corticotrophin-releasing hormone inhibition of gonadotropin secretion during the menstrual cycle. Metabolism 38:504–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Staa TP, Leufkens HGM, Cooper C (2000) The epidemiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 13:777–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39(12):1383–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung A, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S et al (2010) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182:1864–1872

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis, Burlet N, On behalf of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Osteoporosis Foundation (2008) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation. www.nof.org. Accessed September 2013

  9. Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical report. Who collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK. Accessed at www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/. Accessed September 2013

  10. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siminoski K, Leslie W, Frame H, Hodsman A, Josse RG, Khan A et al (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:178–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie WD, Berger C, Langsetmo L, Lix LM, Adachi JD, Hanley G et al (2011) Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts. Osteoporos Int 6:1873–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Mackenzie T, Poliquin S, Brown JP et al (1999) The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A, Robertson L, CaMos Study Group (2000) Vertebral fracture definition from population-based data: preliminary results from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 8:680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarride JE, Hopkins RB, Leslie WE, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A et al (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 23:2591–25600

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Berge C, Joseph L, Papaioannou A, Pickard L et al (2001) The influence of osteoporotic fractures on Health related quality of life in community dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:903–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pichard L et al (2009) Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study. CMAJ 181:265–271

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, de Laet C, Melton LJ III et al (2004) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey M (2011) Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 22:809–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinbuch M, Youket TE, Cohen S (2004) Oral glucocorticoid use is associated with an increased risk of fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2002) The epidemiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 13:777–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salto JK, Davis JW, Wasnich RD, Ross PD (1995) Users of low-dose glucocorticoids have increases bone loss rates: a longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int 57:115–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adachi JD, Bensen WG, Bell MJ et al (1990) Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: follow-up over 3 years. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (eds) Osteoporosis 1990 (3). Third International Symposium on Osteoporosis, Copenhagen, pp 1745–1747

    Google Scholar 

  24. Natsui K, Tanaka K, Suda M, Yasoda A, Sakuma Y, Ozasa A et al (2006) High-dose glucocorticoid treatment induces rapid loss of trabecular bone mineral density and lean body mass. Osteoporos Int 17:105–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Maggi S, Guglielmi G, Siviero P, Rossi S et al (2010) EOLO study group. Effect of inhaled glucocorticoids and beta(2) agonists on vertebral fracture risk in COPD patients: the EOLO study. Calcif Tissue Int 87:137–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2008) Fracture risk associated with different types of oral corticosteroids and effect of termination of corticosteroids on the risk of fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 82:249–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Raman-Wilms L, Beaton DE, Paterson JM (2011) Osteoporosis quality indicators using healthcare utilization data. Osteoporos Int 22:1335–1342

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Z, Kooperberg C, Pettinger MB, Bassford T, Cauley JA, LaCroix AZ et al (2004) Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials. Menopause 11(3):264–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

G. Ioannidis, S. Pallan, M. Mulgund, L. Rios, J. Ma, L. Thabane, K. S. Davison, C. S. Kovacs, N. Kreiger, J. C. Prior, and T. Towheed declare that they have no conflict of interest.

A. Papaioannou: Speaker's bureau: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott. Research grants: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott. Consulting fees or other remuneration (payment): Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott, Wyeth.

R. G. Josse: Advisory board member: Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, BMS/AZ, Janssen. Speaker honoraria: Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, BMS/AZ, Janssen. Research grants: Amgen, Janssen, BMS/AZ.

W. P. Olszynski: Consultant or on a speaker's bureau for Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck Frosst Canada, Novartis, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis.

J. D. Adachi: Speaker's bureau: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott. Research grants: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott, Wyeth. Consulting fees or other remuneration (payment): Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott, Wyeth.

Grant support

The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Amgen, Merck Frosst Canada Ltd., Eli Lilly Canada Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., The Alliance: sanofi-aventis and Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., The Dairy Farmers of Canada, and The Arthritis Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Ioannidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ioannidis, G., Pallan, S., Papaioannou, A. et al. Glucocorticoids predict 10-year fragility fracture risk in a population-based ambulatory cohort of men and women: Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Arch Osteoporos 9, 169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0169-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0169-5

Keywords