Skip to main content
Log in

Patient Portal Message Volume and Time Spent on the EHR: an Observational Study of Primary Care Clinicians

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As patient-initiated messaging rises, identifying variation in message volume and its relationship to clinician workload is essential.

Objective

To describe the association between variation in message volume over time and time spent on the electronic health record (EHR) outside of scheduled hours.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Primary care clinicians at Cleveland Clinic Health System.

Main Measures

We categorized clinicians according to their number of quarterly incoming medical advice messages (i.e., message volume) between January 2019 and December 2021 using group-based trajectory modeling. We assessed change in quarterly messages and outpatient visits between October–December 2019 (Q4) and October–December 2021 (Q12). The primary outcome was time outside of scheduled hours spent on the EHR. We used mixed effects logistic regression to describe the association between incoming portal messages and time spent on the EHR by clinician messaging group and at the clinician level.

Key Results

Among the 150 clinicians, 31% were in the low-volume group (206 messages per quarter per clinician), 47% were in the moderate-volume group (505 messages), and 22% were in the high-volume group (840 messages). Mean quarterly messages increased from 340 to 695 (p < 0.001) between Q4 and Q12; mean quarterly outpatient visits fell from 711 to 575 (p = 0.005). While time spent on the EHR outside of scheduled hours increased modestly for all clinicians, this did not significantly differ by message group. Across all clinicians, each additional 10 messages was associated with an average of 12 min per quarter of additional time spent on the EHR (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Message volume increased substantially over the study period and varied by group. While messages were associated with additional time spent on the EHR outside of scheduled hours, there was no significant difference in time spent on the EHR between the high and low message volume groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The full data from this study is not publicly available, however certain data elements may be shared with outside parties following execution of a data use agreement.

References

  1. Individuals’ Access and Use of Patient Portals and Smartphone Health Apps, 2020 | HealthIT.gov. https://www.healthit.gov/data/data-briefs/individuals-access-and-use-patient-portals-and-smartphone-health-apps-2020. Accessed 22 February 2023.

  2. Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e44. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections from 2016 to 2030. Association of American Medical Colleges.

  4. North F, Luhman KE, Mallmann EA, et al. A Retrospective Analysis of Provider-to-Patient Secure Messages: How Much Are They Increasing, Who Is Doing the Work, and Is the Work Happening After Hours? JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(7):e16521. https://doi.org/10.2196/16521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rule A, Shafer CM, Micek MA, Baltus JJ, Sinsky CA, Arndt BG. Gender Differences in Primary Care Physicians’ Electronic Health Record Use over Time: an Observational Study. J Gen Intern Med. Published online December 6, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07837-2.

  6. Tran B, Lenhart A, Ross R, Dorr DA. Burnout and EHR use among academic primary care physicians with varied clinical workloads. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:136-144.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieu TA, Freed GL. Unbounded—Parent-Physician Communication in the Era of Portal Messaging. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(9):811. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rittenberg E, Liebman JB, Rexrode KM. Primary Care Physician Gender and Electronic Health Record Workload. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(13):3295-3301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rotenstein LS, Fong AS, Jeffery MM, et al. Gender Differences in Time Spent on Documentation and the Electronic Health Record in a Large Ambulatory Network. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(3):e223935. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Cartmill RS. The impact of secure messaging on workflow in primary care: Results of a multiple-case, multiple-method study. Int J Med Inform. 2017;100:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Crotty BH, Tamrat Y, Mostaghimi A, Safran C, Landon BE. Patient-to-physician messaging: volume nearly tripled as more patients joined system, but per capita rate plateaued. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(10):1817-1822. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmgren AJ, Downing NL, Tang M, Sharp C, Longhurst C, Huckman RS. Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinician ambulatory electronic health record use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;29(3):453-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nath B, Williams B, Jeffery MM, et al. Trends in Electronic Health Record Inbox Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Ambulatory Practice Network in New England. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2131490. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lieu TA, Altschuler A, Weiner JZ, et al. Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences With and Strategies for Managing Electronic Messages. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1918287. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rotenstein LS, Holmgren AJ, Downing NL, Bates DW. Differences in Total and After-hours Electronic Health Record Time Across Ambulatory Specialties. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(6):863-865. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arndt BG, Micek MA, Rule A, Shafer CM, Baltus JJ, Sinsky CA. Refining Vendor-Defined Measures to Accurately Quantify EHR Workload Outside Time Scheduled With Patients. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21(3):264-268. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1429-1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00271-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heisey-Grove DM, Carretta HJ. Disparities in Secure Messaging Uptake Between Patients and Physicians: Longitudinal Analysis of Two National Cross-Sectional Surveys. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e12611. https://doi.org/10.2196/12611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagin DS. Group-based trajectory modeling: an overview. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;65(2-3):205-210. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rotenstein L, Jay Holmgren A. COVID exacerbated the gender disparity in physician electronic health record inbox burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Published online July 20, 2023:ocad141. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad141.

  21. Palen TE, Ross C, Powers JD, Xu S. Association of Online Patient Access to Clinicians and Medical Records With Use of Clinical Services. JAMA. 2012;308(19):2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.14126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, et al. The Digital Divide in Adoption and Use of a Personal Health Record. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34.

  23. Ancker JS, Hafeez B, Kaushal R. Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(8):539-540.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mackert M, Mabry-Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health Literacy and Health Information Technology Adoption: The Potential for a New Digital Divide. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(10):e264. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6349.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dudas RA, Pumilia JN, Crocetti M. Pediatric caregiver attitudes and technologic readiness toward electronic follow-up communication in an urban community emergency department. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(6):493-496. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stillman M. Death by Patient Portal. JAMA. 2023;330(3):223-224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.11629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Margolius D, Siff J, Teng K, Einstadter D, Gunzler D, Bolen S. Primary Care Physician Factors Associated with Inbox Message Volume. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(3):460-462. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anthony DL, Campos-Castillo C, Lim PS. Who Isn’t Using Patient Portals And Why? Evidence And Implications From A National Sample Of US Adults. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(12):1948-1954. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn A. Martinez PhD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez, K.A., Schulte, R., Rothberg, M.B. et al. Patient Portal Message Volume and Time Spent on the EHR: an Observational Study of Primary Care Clinicians. J GEN INTERN MED 39, 566–572 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08577-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08577-7

Navigation