Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Learning Community Supporting Experiential Education to Learn About Healthcare Equity Quality Improvement

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Quality improvement (QI) for healthcare equity (HCE) is an important aspect of graduate medical education (GME), but there is limited published research on educational programs teaching this topic.

Aim

To describe and evaluate a novel curriculum and learning community for HCE QI.

Setting

Academic institution.

Participants

Forty-eight participants: 32 learners and 16 faculty.

Program Description

This novel, longitudinal curriculum utilized a virtual hub-and-spoke learning community. Five interdepartmental teams of learners and faculty (spokes) used QI methods to address an existing institutional healthcare inequity (HCI). A team of experts (the hub) led monthly group meetings to foster the learning community and guide teams.

Program Evaluation

Retrospective pre-post curricular surveys assessed participant satisfaction, knowledge, and skills in applying QI methods to address HCIs. Response rate was 33%. The majority of participants (92.4%) reported an increase in knowledge and skills in conducting QI for HCIs. All participants reported an increased likelihood of future engagement in HCE QI. Final QI projects average QIPAT7 score was 25.8 (SD = 4.93), consistent with “meets expectations” in most categories.

Discussion

This program is a feasible model to teach GME learners and faculty about HCE QI and may be adopted by other institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Data Availability

The data is available within the article and supplementary materials or otherwise available by request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Ma S, Agrawal S, Salhi R. Distinguishing health equity and health care equity: a framework for measurement. NEJM Catalyst. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.22.0442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dupras DM, Wieland ML, Halvorsen AJ, et al. Assessment of training in health disparities in US internal medicine residency programs. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2012757- e2012757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Maldonado ME, Fried ED, DuBose TD, et al. The role that graduate medical education must play in ensuring health equity and eliminating health care disparities. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(4):603-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasnain M, Massengale L, Dykens A, et al. Health disparities training in residency programs in the United States. Fam Med. 2014;46(3):186-91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thibault G. Resident Empowerment as a Driving Theme of Graduate Medical Education Reform. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):357-359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Co JPT, Weiss KB, Koh NJ. CLER national report of findings 2019: Initial visits to sponsoring institutions with 2 or fewer core residency programs. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical.

  7. Co JPT, Weiss KB. CLER Pathways to Excellence: Expectations for an Optimal Clinical Learning Environment to Achieve Safe and High-Quality Patient Care, Version 2.0: Executive Summary. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(6):739-41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner, R, Koh, N, Bagian, JP, Weiss, KB, for the CLER Program. CLER 2016 National Report of Findings. Issue Brief #4: Health Care Disparities. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois USA. ISBN-13: 978–1–945365–07–2

  9. Casey BR, Newton RC, Wagner R, Koh NJ, Co JPT, Weiss KB; on behalf of the CLER Evaluation Committee and the CLER Program. CLER Special Report: Sponsoring Institutions with Clinical Learning Environments in Unique Settings 2020. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.35425/ACGME.0005

  10. Casey BR, Chisholm-Burns M, Passiment M, Wagner R, Riordan L, Weiss KB. Role of the clinical learning environment in preparing new clinicians to engage in quality improvement efforts to eliminate health care disparities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(1):39-46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aysola J, Myers JS. Integrating Training in Quality Improvement and Health Equity in Graduate Medical Education: Two Curricula for the Price of One. Acad Med. 2018;93(1):31-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lion KC, Raphael JL. Partnering health disparities research with quality improvement science in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):354-361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Britto MT, Fuller SC, Kaplan HC, et al. Using a network organizational architecture to support the development of learning healthcare systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:937-946.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong BM, Goldman J, Goguen JM, et al. Faculty–resident “co-learning”: A longitudinal exploration of an innovative model for faculty development in quality improvement. Acad Med. 2017;92(8):1151-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams MV, Li J, Hansen LO, et al. Project BOOST implementation: lessons learned. South Med J. 2014;107(7):455-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Starmer AJ, O'Toole JK, Rosenbluth G, et al. Development, implementation, and dissemination of the I-PASS handoff curriculum: A multisite educational intervention to improve patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2014;89(6):876-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, et al. The Impact of Project ECHO on Participant and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1439-1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett KA, Ong T, Verrall AM, et al. Project ECHO-Geriatrics: Training Future Primary Care Providers to Meet the Needs of Older Adults. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(3):311-315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, et al. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2199-2207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arora S, Mate KS, Jones JL, et al. Enhancing Collaborative Learning for Quality Improvement: Evidence from the Improving Clinical Flow Project, a Breakthrough Series Collaborative with Project ECHO. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(8):448-456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ball J. The Double Diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. Design Council. Published 2022. Accessed 1 Aug 2022. Designcouncil.org.uk. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/.

  22. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Resources. How to Improve: Model for Improvement. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Published 2022. Accessed Aug 2022. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

  23. Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(1):1-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sánchez-Mendiola M, Morales-Castillo D, Torruco-García U, et al. Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0499-7

  25. Leenstra JL, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, et al. Validation of a method for assessing resident physicians’ quality improvement proposals. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1330-1334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.: 2019.

  27. Ogrinc G, Armstrong GE, Dolansky MA, et al. SQUIRE-EDU (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence in Education): Publication Guidelines for Educational Improvement. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1461-1470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Bergen MR. Evaluation of a medical faculty development program: a comparison of traditional pre/post and retrospective pre/post self-assessment ratings. Eval Health Prof. 1992;15(3):350-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the hub members of the EQUIP for Equity program, including Rickie Brawer and Byron Scott. This educational initiative received funding from the Thomas Jefferson University Center for Faculty Development and Learning Nexus Grant. This work was previously presented as an oral presentation at the Thomas Jefferson University Disparities Summit in June 2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianna Cheney-Peters MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 301 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheney-Peters, D., Liveright, E., Shusted, C. et al. A Learning Community Supporting Experiential Education to Learn About Healthcare Equity Quality Improvement. J GEN INTERN MED 38, 3060–3064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08314-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08314-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation