Skip to main content
Log in

Turning Evidence into Practice Under Payment Reform: The New Frontier of Translational Science

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Momentum is building to replace the current fee-for-service payment system with value-based reimbursement models that aim to deliver high quality care at lower costs. Although the goals of payment and delivery system reforms to improve quality and reduce costs are clear, the actual path by which provider groups can achieve these goals is not well understood, in large part because the role of identifying and discouraging the use of low-value, high-cost services and encouraging the use of high-value, low-cost services has traditionally fallen to health plans, not provider groups. The shifting focus towards provider accountability for costs and quality promises to expand the role of provider organizations from mainly delivering care to both delivering and prioritizing it based on costs and quality. We discuss how progress on two important but challenging fronts will be needed for provider groups to successfully translate evidence into value. First, robust evidence on the costs and benefits of treatments will need to be developed and made easily accessible to provider groups. Second, provider groups will need to translate that evidence into systems that support cost-effective clinical decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA. 2012;307:1801–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz AL, Landon BE, Elshaug AG, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM. Measuring Low-Value Care in Medicare. JAMA Intern Med 2014.

  3. Elshaug AG, McWilliams JM, Landon BE. The value of low-value lists. JAMA. 2013;309:775–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palen TE, Price D, Shetterly S, Wallace KB. Comparing virtual consults to traditional consults using an electronic health record: an observational case–control study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1370–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lord RK, Mayhew CR, Korupolu R, et al. ICU early physical rehabilitation programs: financial modeling of cost savings. Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41:717–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Philipson TJ, Snider JT, Lakdawalla DN, Stryckman B, Goldman DP. Impact of oral nutritional supplementation on hospital outcomes. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:121–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tufts Cost Effectiveness Analysis Registry. 2013. (Accessed July 18, 2014, at https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear4/.)

  9. van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2006;13:138–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kesselheim AS, Cresswell K, Phansalkar S, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce ‘alert fatigue’ while still minimizing the risk of litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:2310–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adler-Milstein J, Salzberg C, Franz C, Orav EJ, Newhouse JP, Bates DW. Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adler-Milstein J, Salzberg C, Franz C, Orav EJ, Bates DW. The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Ambulatory Costs Among Medicaid Beneficiaries. Medicare & Medicaid Research Review. 2013;3:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwenk TL. The patient-centered medical home: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2014;311:802–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson K, Helfrich C, Sun H, et al. Implementation of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in the Veterans Health Administration: Associations With Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Care, Staff Burnout, and Hospital and Emergency Department Use. JAMA Intern Med 2014.

  15. Hebert PL, Liu CF, Wong ES, et al. Patient-centered medical home initiative produced modest economic results for veterans health administration, 2010–12. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:980–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Jena reports receipt of an award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH Early Independence Award, 1DP5OD017897-01). Dr. McWilliams is supported by grants from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Clinical Scientist Development Award #2010053), Beeson Career Development Award Program (National Institute on Aging K08 AG038354 and the American Federation for Aging Research), and National Institute on Aging (P01 AG032952). Support for this research was provided by Abbott Laboratories.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Jena reports providing consulting services to Precision Health Economics, which received support from Abbott Laboratories to conduct this research. Precision Health Economics also provides research and consulting services to the life sciences industries and government. Dr. Stevens is an economist at that organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupam B. Jena M.D, Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jena, A.B., Stevens, W. & McWilliams, J.M. Turning Evidence into Practice Under Payment Reform: The New Frontier of Translational Science. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 1542–1545 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2979-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2979-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation