Skip to main content
Log in

Primary Care Clinicians’ Recognition and Management of Depression: A Model of Depression Care in Real-World Primary Care Practice

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Depression is prevalent in primary care (PC) practices and poses a considerable public health burden in the United States. Despite nearly four decades of efforts to improve depression care quality in PC practices, a gap remains between desired treatment outcomes and the reality of how depression care is delivered.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents a real-world PC practice model of depression care, elucidating the processes and their influencing conditions.

DESIGN

Grounded theory methodology was used for the data collection and analysis to develop a depression care model. Data were collected from 70 individual interviews (60 to 70 min each), three focus group interviews (n = 24, 2 h each), two surveys per clinician, and investigators’ field notes on practice environments. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed for analysis. Surveys and field notes complemented interview data.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy primary care clinicians from 52 PC offices in the Midwest: 28 general internists, 28 family physicians, and 14 nurse practitioners.

KEY RESULTS

A depression care model was developed that illustrates how real-world conditions infuse complexity into each step of the depression care process. Depression care in PC settings is mediated through clinicians’ interactions with patients, practice, and the local community. A clinician’s interactional familiarity (“familiarity capital”) was a powerful facilitator for depression care. For the recognition of depression, three previously reported processes and three conditions were confirmed. For the management of depression, 13 processes and 11 conditions were identified. Empowering the patient was a parallel process to the management of depression.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinician’s ability to develop and utilize interactional relationships and resources needed to recognize and treat a person with depression is key to depression care in primary care settings. The interactional context of depression care makes empowering the patient central to depression care delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Satcher DS. Executive summary: a report of the surgeon general on mental health. Public Health Rep. 2000;115:89–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Donohue JM, Pincus HA. Reducing the societal burden of depression: a review of economic costs, quality of care and effects of treatment. PharmacoEconomics. 2007;25:7–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Wang PS. Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:137–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfson D, Bernabeo E, Leas B, Sofaer S, Pawlson G, Pillittere D. Quality improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Fam Prac. 2009;10:14. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-10-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirschfeld RM, Keller MB, Panico S, et al. The national depressive and manic-depressive association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA. 1997;277:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang PS, Land M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:629–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marks JN, Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness. Psychol Med. 1979;9:337–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg D, Steele JJ, Johnson A, Smith C. Ability of PC physicians to make accurate ratings of psychiatric symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:829–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells KB, Hays RD, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Detection of depressive disorders for patients receiving prepaid or fee-for-service care. Results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA. 1989;262:3298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roter D, Lipkin M Jr, Korsgaard A. Sex differences in patients’ and physicians’ communication during PC medical visits. Med Care. 1991;29:1083–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerber PD, Barrett JE, Barrett JA, Oxman TE, Manheimer E, Smith R, et al. The relationship of presenting physical complaints to depressive symptoms in PC patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:170–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Main DS, Lutz LJ, Barrett JE, Matthew J, Miller RS. The role of PC clinician attitudes, beliefs, and training in the diagnosis and treatment of depression. A report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Inc. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper-Patrick L, Crum RM, Ford DE. Characteristics of patients with major depression who received care in general medical and specialty mental health settings. Med Care. 1994;32:15–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson SM, Harthorn BH. Changing the psychiatric knowledge of PC physicians. The effects of a brief intervention on clinical diagnosis and treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1990;12:177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Magruder-Habib K, Zung WW, Feussner JR. Improving physicians’ recognition and treatment of depression in general medical care. Results from a randomized clinical trial. Med Care. 1990;28:239–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Linzer M, deGruy FV 3rd, Hahn SR, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in PC. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomson C, Kinmonth AL, Stevens L, Peveler RC, Stevens A, Ostler KJ, et al. Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in PC: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbody S, Whitty P, Grimshaw J, Thomas R. Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in PC. JAMA. 2003;289:3145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wegner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kramer TL, Beaudin CL, Thrush CR. Evaluation and treatment of depression (part I): benefits for patients, providers, and payors. Dis Manage Health Outcome. 2005;13:295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beaudin C, Kramer T. Evaluation and treatment in managed Care (part II): quality improvement programs. Dis Manage Health Outcome. 2005;13:307–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic model in the new millennium. Health Aff(Millwood). 2009;28:75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Starfield B. Is patient-centered care the same as person-focused care? Perm J. 2011;15:63–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blount A. Integrated PC: organizing the evidence. Fam Syst Health. 2003;21:121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, Walker E, Simon GE, Bush T, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in PC. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin EH, Katon WJ, Simon GE, Von Korff M, Bush TM, Rutter CM, et al. Achieving guidelines for the treatment of depression in PC: is physician education enough? Med Care. 1997;35:831–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunkeler EM, Meresman JF, Hargreaves WA, Fireman B, Berman WH, Kirsch AJ, et al. Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in PC. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:700–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Simon GE, Vonkorff M, Rutter C, Wagner E. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in PC. BMJ. 2000;320:550–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wells KB, Sherbourne C, Schoenbaum M, Duan N, Meredith L, Unutzer J, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in manage PC: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:212–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Werner J, Duan N. Improving depression outcomes in community PC practice: a randomized trial of the QuEST Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Von Korff M, Unutzer J, Katon W, Wells K. Improving care for depression in organized health care systems. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:530–1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boudreau DM, Capoccia KL, Sullivan SD, Blough DK, Ellsworth AJ, Clark DL, et al. Collaborative care model to improve outcomes in major depression. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubenstein LV, Parker LE, Meredith LS, Alschuler A, dePillis E, Hernandez J, et al. Understanding team-based quality improvement for depression in PC. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1009–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, Williams JW Jr, Hunkeler E, Harpole L, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the PC setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2836–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Frank RG, Huskamp HA, Pincus HA. Aligning incentives in the treatment of depression in PC with evidence-based practice. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:682–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oxman TE, Dietrich AJ, Schulberg HC. The depression care manager and mental health specialist as collaborators within PC. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;11:507–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CR 3rd, Katz II, Schulberg HC, Mulsant BH, et al. Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older PC patients; a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:1081–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE, Williams JW, Schulberg HC, Bruce ML, Lee PW, et al. Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in PC: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;329:602. Epub 2004 Sep 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gaynes BN, Warden I, Madhukar TH, Wisniewski SR, Fava M, Rush AJ. What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;601:1439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF, Ober S, Felker B, Sherman SE, Lanto A, et al. Using evidence-based quality improvement methods for translating depression collaborative care research into practice. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28:91–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Starfield B. Contribution of PC to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83:457–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Boult C, Green AF, Boult LB, Pacala JT, Snyder C, Leff B. Successful models of comprehensive care for older adults with chronic conditions: evidence for the institute of medicine’s “retooling for an aging America” report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:2328–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Carrier E, Gourevitch MN, Shah NR. Medical homes: challenges in translating theory into practice. Med Care. 2009;47:714–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle VA, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations (Review). The Cochrane Library. 2009;1:1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nutting PA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF, Jaen CR, Stewart EE, Stange KC. Initial lessons from the first national demonstration project on practice transformation to a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, Ross TR, Tufano JT, Soman MP, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;5:e71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Crabtree BJ, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart EE, Jean CR. Summary of the National Demonstration Project and recommendations for the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:S80–90. S92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Stange KC, Jean CR, et al. PC practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research. Med Care. 2011;49:S28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gilbody S, Bower P, Whitty PA. Costs and consequences of enhanced PC for depression: systematic review of randomized economic evaluations. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:297–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Unutzer J, Katon WJ, Fan MY, Schoenbaum MC, Lin EH, Della Penna RD, et al. Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14:95–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kathol RG, Butler R, McAlpine DD, Kane RL. Barriers to physical and mental condition integrated service delivery. Psychosom Med. 2010;72:511–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kilbourne AM, Schulberg HC, Post EP, Rollman BL, Belnap BH, Pincus HA. Translating evidence-based depression management services to community-based PC practices. Milbank Q. 2004;82:631–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oxman TE, Dietrich AJ, Schulberg HC. Evidence-based models of integrated management of depression in PC. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005;28:1061–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Harkness EF, Bower PJ. On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in PC: effects on the professional practice of PC providers. The Cochrane Library 2010;7:1–60. Online-Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009;1:1–60. Art. No:CD000532. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD000532.pub2.

  55. Glaser B, Anselm S. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Strauss A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Bowers B. Grounded Theory. In: Barbara S, ed. Paths to Knowledge: Innovative Research Methods for Nursing. Washington DC: National League for Nursing; 1989:33–59. Print. Pub No. 15–2233.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Baik SY, Gonzales JJ, Bowers BJ, Anthony JS, Tidjani B, Susman JL. Reinvention of depression instruments by PCCs. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Baik SY, Bowers BJ, Oakley LD, Susman JL. The recognition of depression: the primary care clinician’s perspective. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Baik SY, Bowers BJ, Oakley LD, Susman JL. What comprises clinical experience in recognizing depression?: the primary care clinician’s perspective. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:200–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Christensen RE, Fetters MD, Green LA. Opening the black box: cognitive strategies in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:144–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Starfield B. PC: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:134–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Adler R, Vasiliadis A, Bickell N. The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2010;27:171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nutting PA, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC. Continuity of PC: to whom does it matter and when? Ann Fam Med. 2003;3:149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fortin M, Hudon C, Bayliss EA, van den Akker M. Multimorbidity’s many challenges. BMJ. 2007;334:1016–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Levinson W, Lesser CS, Epstein RM. Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care. Health Aff(Millwood). 2010;29:1310–8.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Camacho F, Anderson R, Safrit A, Jones AS, Hoffmann P. The relationship between patients’ perceived waiting time and office-based practice satisfaction. N C Med J. 2006;67:409–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mauksch LB, Daudate DC, Dodson S, Epstein R. Relationship, communication, and efficiency in the medical encounter. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1387–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Contributors

We would like to thank all the clinicians who participated in this study for their time as well as their genuine and candid perspectives on their everyday practices and on depression care. We also thank the DEED project investigators for their participation in ongoing data analysis: Dr. Jean Anthony, Dr. Barbara Bowers, Dr. Jeffery Susman, and Dr. Bas Tidjani.

Funder

This study was fully funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R34 071719).

Prior presentations

Portions of the manuscript content have been presented at the following national conferences:

Integrating Service, Integrating Research for Co-Occurring Conditions: A Need for Views and Action, March 2–3, 2009. Washington, DC.

AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, June 28–30, 2009. Chicago, IL.

AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, June 27–29, 2010. Boston, MA.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Yi Baik PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 70 kb)

ESM 2

(DOC 83 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baik, SY., Crabtree, B.F. & Gonzales, J.J. Primary Care Clinicians’ Recognition and Management of Depression: A Model of Depression Care in Real-World Primary Care Practice. J GEN INTERN MED 28, 1430–1439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2468-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2468-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation