Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item Diabetes Fatalism Scale

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the development and validation of the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (DFS) in adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Thirty-five items were derived from focus groups, literature review, and expert opinion. The items were pilot tested on 20 adults with diabetes and then administered to 216 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis (Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation) yielded a 12-item scale with three subscales. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the DFS’s association with diabetes self-care, HbA1c and quality of life. Multiple linear regression was used to assess association between the DFS and HbA1c controlling for demographics, comorbidity and insulin use.

RESULTS

Cronbach’s alpha for the 12-item DFS scale was 0.804 indicating internal consistency. The DFS is scored in such a way that higher scores represent greater diabetes fatalism. The DFS scores were not significantly correlated with age, years of education, or diabetes duration. Whites, men, those with government or no insurance, and those with 3+ comorbid conditions had significantly higher DFS scores. DFS was significantly correlated with self management understanding (r = -0.35, p < 0.001), control problems (r = 0.22, p = 0.002), self-care ability (r = -0.30, p < 0.001), and self-care adherence (r = -0.23, p < 0.001). The DFS was significantly correlated with HbA1c (r = 0.20, p = 0.004) and mental health component of SF-12 (r = -0.24, p = 0.001). In multivariate models, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity and insulin use, the DFS was independently associated with increased HbA1c (beta 0.21, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The DFS is a valid and reliable measure of diabetes fatalism. Diabetes fatalism is associated with self-care problems, poor glycemic control, and decreased quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009. “Fatalism”. Merriam-Webster Online. Available online http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fatalism Accessed October 16, 2009.

  2. Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Structure and correlates of diabetes-specific locus of control. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:994–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallston BS, Wallston KA, Kaplan GD, Maides SA. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1976;44:580–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davison C, Frankel S, Smith GD. The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing ‘fatalism’ in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:675–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:418–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80:1–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Powe BD, Weinrich S. An intervention to decrease cancer fatalism among rural elders. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:583–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Powe BD. Cancer fatalism among African-Americans: a review of the literature. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44:18–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayo RM, Ureda JR, Parker VG. Importance of fatalism in understanding mammography screening in rural elderly women. J Women Aging. 2001;13:57–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conrad ME, Brown P, Conrad MG. Fatalism and breast cancer in black women. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:941–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Powe BD, Johnson A. Fatalism among African Americans: philosophical perspectives. J Relig Health. 1995;34(2):119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boone C, De Brabander B, Gerits P, Willeme P. Relation of scores on Rotter’s I-E scale to short-term and long-term control expectancies and fatalism. Psychol Rep. 1990;66:1107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neighbors HW, Jackson JS, Broman C, Thompson E. Racism and the mental health of African Americans: the role of self and system blame. Ethn Dis. 1996;6:167–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Egede LE, Bonadonna RJ. Diabetes self-management in African Americans: an exploration of the role of fatalism. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29(1):105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, Barr PA, Anderson RM, Hiss RG, Davis WK. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(5):706–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the diabetes care profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19(2):208–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measurement. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallhagen MI, Lacson M. Perceived control and psychosocial/physiological functioning in African American elders with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1999;25(4):568–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Wexler DJ, Cagliero E, Meigs JB. Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007;24:48–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The problem areas in diabetes scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):760–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peyrot M, McMurry JF, Kruger DF. A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(2):141–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quinn MT, Cook S, Nash K, Chin MH. Addressing religion and spirituality in African Americans with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2001;27(5):643–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard E. Egede MD, MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egede, L.E., Ellis, C. Development and Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item Diabetes Fatalism Scale. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 61–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1168-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1168-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation