Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study describes the development and validation of the Diabetes Fatalism Scale (DFS) in adults with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
Thirty-five items were derived from focus groups, literature review, and expert opinion. The items were pilot tested on 20 adults with diabetes and then administered to 216 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to assess the validity and reliability of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis (Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation) yielded a 12-item scale with three subscales. Pearson’s correlation was used to test the DFS’s association with diabetes self-care, HbA1c and quality of life. Multiple linear regression was used to assess association between the DFS and HbA1c controlling for demographics, comorbidity and insulin use.
RESULTS
Cronbach’s alpha for the 12-item DFS scale was 0.804 indicating internal consistency. The DFS is scored in such a way that higher scores represent greater diabetes fatalism. The DFS scores were not significantly correlated with age, years of education, or diabetes duration. Whites, men, those with government or no insurance, and those with 3+ comorbid conditions had significantly higher DFS scores. DFS was significantly correlated with self management understanding (r = -0.35, p < 0.001), control problems (r = 0.22, p = 0.002), self-care ability (r = -0.30, p < 0.001), and self-care adherence (r = -0.23, p < 0.001). The DFS was significantly correlated with HbA1c (r = 0.20, p = 0.004) and mental health component of SF-12 (r = -0.24, p = 0.001). In multivariate models, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity and insulin use, the DFS was independently associated with increased HbA1c (beta 0.21, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
The DFS is a valid and reliable measure of diabetes fatalism. Diabetes fatalism is associated with self-care problems, poor glycemic control, and decreased quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009. “Fatalism”. Merriam-Webster Online. Available online http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fatalism Accessed October 16, 2009.
Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Structure and correlates of diabetes-specific locus of control. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:994–1001.
Wallston BS, Wallston KA, Kaplan GD, Maides SA. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1976;44:580–5.
Davison C, Frankel S, Smith GD. The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing ‘fatalism’ in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:675–85.
Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:418–24.
Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80:1–28.
Powe BD, Weinrich S. An intervention to decrease cancer fatalism among rural elders. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:583–8.
Powe BD. Cancer fatalism among African-Americans: a review of the literature. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44:18–21.
Mayo RM, Ureda JR, Parker VG. Importance of fatalism in understanding mammography screening in rural elderly women. J Women Aging. 2001;13:57–72.
Conrad ME, Brown P, Conrad MG. Fatalism and breast cancer in black women. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:941–2.
Powe BD, Johnson A. Fatalism among African Americans: philosophical perspectives. J Relig Health. 1995;34(2):119–25.
Boone C, De Brabander B, Gerits P, Willeme P. Relation of scores on Rotter’s I-E scale to short-term and long-term control expectancies and fatalism. Psychol Rep. 1990;66:1107–11.
Neighbors HW, Jackson JS, Broman C, Thompson E. Racism and the mental health of African Americans: the role of self and system blame. Ethn Dis. 1996;6:167–75.
Egede LE, Bonadonna RJ. Diabetes self-management in African Americans: an exploration of the role of fatalism. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29(1):105–15.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.
Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, Barr PA, Anderson RM, Hiss RG, Davis WK. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(5):706–10.
Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the diabetes care profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19(2):208–30.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measurement. 1977;1:385–401.
Wallhagen MI, Lacson M. Perceived control and psychosocial/physiological functioning in African American elders with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1999;25(4):568–75.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1994.
Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Wexler DJ, Cagliero E, Meigs JB. Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007;24:48–54.
Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The problem areas in diabetes scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):760–6.
Peyrot M, McMurry JF, Kruger DF. A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(2):141–58.
Quinn MT, Cook S, Nash K, Chin MH. Addressing religion and spirituality in African Americans with diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2001;27(5):643–55.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egede, L.E., Ellis, C. Development and Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item Diabetes Fatalism Scale. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 61–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1168-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1168-5