Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibitory effect of endostar in combination with radiotherapy in a mouse model of human CNE2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The inhibitory effects of Endostar in combination with radiotherapy in BALB/c nude mice model of human CNE2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the mechanism were investigated. In nude mice model of CNE2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the inhibitory rate and the sensitizing enhancement ratio (E/O) were calculated according to the tumor volumes in different groups. The expression of microvascular density (MVD) in tumor tissues was examined by using immunohistochemistry staining. The transcription of VEGF gene was detected by using RT-PCR. The inhibitory rate in Endostar+ radiotherapy group was higher than in other groups. In Endostar+radiotherapy group, the tumor volume was significantly decreased and the E/O ratio was 2.335, suggesting that Endostar could be a radiosensitizer. The expression of MVD of tumor tissues in Endostar+radiotherapy group was reduced significantly. The expression of the MVD in treatment groups was significantly different from that in control group (P<0.05). Compared to other groups, VEGF mRNA expression in Endostar+radiotherapy group was decreased remarkably. Endostar in combination with radiotherapy significantly inhibited the growth of CNE2 tumor. The combination therapy decreased the expression of VEGF, and inhibited tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. When combined with radiotherapy, Endostar acted as a radiosensitizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang JW, Liu Y, Liu YY. Results of randomized, multi-center, double-blind phase III trial of rh-endostatin (YH-16) in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Zhongguo Feiai Zazhi (Chinese), 2005,8(4):283–290

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sund M, Hamano Y, Sugimoto H, et al. Function of endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis as endothelium-specific tumor suppressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005,102(8):2934–2939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang LP, Xu XY, Lou G. Radiosensitizing effect of CPT-11 on cervical carcinoma transplanted tumor in nude mice. Zhongguo Xiandai Yixue Zazhi (Chinese), 2006,16(22): 3368–3370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen QL, Meng MB, Yang B, et al. Endostar, a recombined humanized endostatin, enhances the radioresponse for human nasopharyngeal carcinoma and human lung adenocarcinoma xenografts in mice. Cancer Sci, 2009, 100(8):1510–1519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauceri HJ, Hanna NN, Beckett MA, et al. Combined effects of angiostatin and ionizing radiation in antitumour therapy. Nature, 1998,394(6690):287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi W, Teschendorf C, Muzyczka N, et al. Gene therapy delivery of endostatin enhances the treatment efficacy of radiation. Radiother Oncol, 2003,66(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo X, Slater JM, Gridley DS. Radiation and endostatin gene therapy in a lung carcinoma model: pilot data on cells and cytokines that affect angiogenesis and immune status. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2006,5(2):135–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo X, Slater JM, Gridley DS. Enhancement of radiation effects by pXLG-mEndo in a lung carcinoma model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005,63(2): 553–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reis RC, Schuppan D, Barreto AC, et al. Endostatin competes with bFGF for binding to heparin-like glycosaminoglycans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005, 333(3):976–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashizume H, Baluk P, Morikawa S, et al. Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. Am J Pathol, 2000,156(4):1363–1380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morikawa P, Baluk T, Kaidoh A, et al. Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am J Pathol, 2002,160(3):985–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber CC, Cai H, Ehrbar M, et al. Effects of protein and gene transfer of the angiopoieti-1 fibrinogen-like receptor-binding domain on endothelial and vessel organization. J Biol Chem, 2005,280(23):22 445–22 453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain RK, Munn LL, Fukumura D. Dissecting tumor pathophysiology using intravital microscopy. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002,2(4):266–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain RK. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res, 1988,48(10):2641–2658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bussink J, Kaanders JH, van der Kogel AJ. Tumor hypoxia at the micro-regional level: clinical relevance and predictive value of exogenous and endogenous hypoxic cell markers. Radiother Oncol, 2003,67(1):3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CG, Heijn M, di Tomaso E. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res, 2000,60(19):5565–5570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science, 2005,307(5706):58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Guoqing  (胡国清).

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this work.

This project was supported by a grant from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 30470525).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, N., Hu), G., Mei, Q. et al. Inhibitory effect of endostar in combination with radiotherapy in a mouse model of human CNE2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 31, 62–66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-011-0151-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-011-0151-7

Key words

Navigation