Skip to main content
Log in

A min-cut approach to functional regionalization, with a case study of the Italian local labour market areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In several economical, statistical and geographical applications, a territory must be subdivided into functional regions. Such regions are not fixed and politically delimited, but should be identified by analyzing the interactions among all its constituent localities. This is a very delicate and important task, that often turns out to be computationally difficult. In this work we propose an innovative approach to this problem based on the solution of minimum cut problems over an undirected graph called here transitions graph. The proposed procedure guarantees that the obtained regions satisfy all the statistical conditions required when considering this type of problems. Results on real-world instances show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen, R., Chung, F., Lang, K.: Local graph partitioning using PageRank vectors. In: Proceeding of 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 475–486 (2006)

  2. Bichot, C.E., Siarry, P.: Graph Partitioning. ISTE - Wiley, London (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkmeier, M.: A simple and fast min-cut algorithm. Theory Comput. Syst. 41(2), 369–380 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruni, R., Bianchi, G.: Effective classification using binarization and statistical analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27(9), 2349–2361 (2015)

  5. Canello, J., Pavone, P.: Mapping the multifaceted patterns of industrial districts: a new empirical procedure with application to Italian data. Reg. Stud. (2015). doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1011611

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casado-Díaz, J.M., Coombes, M.G.: The delineation of 21st century local labour market areas: a critical review and research agenda. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 57, 7–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coombes, M.G., Openshaw, S.: The use and definition of Travel-to-Work Areas in Great Britain: some comments. Reg. Stud. 16(2), 141–149 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coombes, M.G., Green, A.E., Openshaw, S.: An efficient algorithm to generate official statistical reporting areas: the case of the 1984 Travel-to-Work Areas revision in Britain. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 37, 943–953 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coombes, M.G.: Defining boundaries from syntetic data. Environ. Plan. 32, 1499–1518 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahmann, D.C., Fitzsimmons, J.D. (eds.) Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: new approaches to geographical definition. Bureau of the Census Working Paper 12, Washington: Bureau of the Census (1995)

  11. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory, 4th edn. Springer, New York (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Giacinto, V., Gomellini, M., Micucci, G., Pagnini, M.: Mapping local productivity advantages in Italy: industrial districts, cities or both? J. Econ. Geogr. 14(2), 365–394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duque, J.C., Ramos, R., Suriach, J.: Supervised regionalization methods: a survey. Int. Region. Sci. Rev. 30, 195–220 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farmer, C.J.Q., Steward Fotheringam, A.: Network-based functional regions. Environ. Plan. 43, 2723–2741 (2011)

  15. Fischer, M.M.: Regional taxonomy: a comparison of some hierarchic and non-hierarchic strategies. Region. Sci. Urban Econ. 10, 503–537 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flórez-Revuelta, F., Casado-Díaz, J.M., Martínez-Bernabeu, L.: An evolutionary approach to the delineation of functional areas based on travel-to-work flows. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 5(1), 10–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fortunato, S., Barthélemy, M.: Resolution limit in community detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(1), 36–41 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fusco, G., Caglioni, M.: Hierarchical clustering through spatial interaction data. The case of commuting flows in South-Eastern France. LNCS 6782, 135–151 (2011)

  19. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman, J.F.B.: The definition and analysis of local labour markets: some empirical problems. Br. J. Ind. Rel. 8, 179–186 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guimerá, R., Sales-Pardo, M., Amaral, L.: Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 025101 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hao, J.X., Orlin, J.B.: A faster algorithm for finding the minimum cut in a directed graph. J. Algorithm. 17(3), 424–446 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopcroft, J., Tarjan, R.: Efficient algorithms for graph manipulation. Commun. ACM 16(6), 372–378 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ISTAT: I sistemi locali del lavoro 2011. Nota metodologica (2015) Retrieved from http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20050721_00/testointegrale.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2015

  25. Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20(1), 359–392 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, H., Chun, Y., Kim, K.: Delimitation of functional regions using a p-regions problem approach. Int. Region. Sci. Rev. (2013). doi:10.1177/0160017613484929

    Google Scholar 

  27. van der Laan, L., Schalke, R.: Reality versus policy: the delineation and testing of local labour market and spatial policy areas. Eur. Plan. Stud. 9(2), 201–221 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leskovec, J., Lang, K.J., Mahoney, M.W.: Network empirical comparison of algorithms for community detection. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, April 26–30, AACM New York, NY (2010)

  29. Martínez-Bernabeu, L., Flórez-Revuelta, F., Casado-Díaz, J.M.: Grouping genetic operators for the delineation of functional areas based on spatial interaction. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 6754–6766 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Masser, I., Brown, P.J.B.: Hierarchical aggregation procedures for interaction data. Environ. Planning 7, 509–523 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nagamochi, H., Ibaraki, T.: Computing edge-connectivity in multigraphs and capacitated graphs. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 5, 54–66 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Nemhauser, G.L., Wolsey, L.A.: Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley, New York (1988)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Orasi, A., Sforzi, F.: I sistemi locali del lavoro 2001. ISTAT research report published online (2005). http://www.istat.it/it/files/2014/12/nota-metodologica_SLL2011_rev20150205.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2015

  34. Ricca, F., Scozzari, A., Simeone, B.: Political districting: from classical models to recent approaches. Ann. Oper. Res. 204, 271–299 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Sforzi, F., Openshaw, S., Wymer, C.: La delimitazione di sistemi spaziali sub-regionali: scopi, algoritmi, applicazioni. In: 3rd AISRe Annual Conference, Venezia, 10–12 Nov 1982

  36. Sforzi, F. (ed.): I mercati locali del lavoro in Italia. ISTAT-IRPET, Seminario su: Identificazione di sistemi territoriali. Analisi della struttura sociale e produttiva in Italia, Roma 3–4 Dec 1986

  37. Sforzi, F. (ed.): I Mercati Locali del Lavoro in Italia. Franco Angeli, Milan (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sforzi, F., Openshaw, S., Wymer, C.: La procedura di identificazione dei sistemi locali del lavoro. ISTAT, I Sistemi Locali del Lavoro 1991, pp. 235–247, Rome (1997)

  39. Sforzi, F.: From administrative spatial units to local labour market areas. Some remarks on the unit of investigation of regional economics with particular reference to the applied research in Italy. In: Fernández-Vázquez, E., Rubiera-Morollón, F. (eds.) Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis, pp. 3–21. Springer, Berlin (2012)

  40. Smart, M.W.: Labour market areas: uses and definition. Progr. Planning 2(4), 239–353 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stoer, M., Wagner, F.: A simple min-cut algorithm. J. ACM 44(4), 585–591 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. van der Zwan, J., van der Wel, R., de Jong, T., Floor, H.: Flowmap 7.2 Manual. Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. White, S., Smyth, P.A.: Spectral clustering approach to finding communities in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 5th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 76–84 (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato Bruni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bianchi, G., Bruni, R., Reale, A. et al. A min-cut approach to functional regionalization, with a case study of the Italian local labour market areas. Optim Lett 10, 955–973 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0980-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0980-6

Keywords

Navigation